Literature DB >> 16804253

The Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device.

William Vogt1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthod        ISSN: 0022-3875


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  A Custom Made Skeletal Class II Corrector Appliance in Late Adolescent Phase.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Tulika Tripathi; Priyank Rai; Shilpa Kalra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Comparative evaluation of treatment effects between two fixed functional appliances for correction of Class II malocclusion: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vinni Arora; Rekha Sharma; Sonal Chowdhary
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Osama Eissa; Mahmoud ElShennawy; Safaa Gaballah; Ghada ElMehy; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patients.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Caterina Masucci; Efisio Defraia; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sherif A Elkordy; Amr M Abouelezz; Mona M S Fayed; Mai H Aboulfotouh; Yehya A Mostafa
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Reverse Forsus vs. facemask/rapid palatal expansion appliances in growing subjects with mild class III malocclusions : A randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Yavan; Aysegul Gulec; Metin Orhan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A comparison of the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices for skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Qi Zhan; Jing Zhou; Qianyun Kuang; Xinyu Yan; Xiaoqi Zhang; Yue Shan; Wenli Lai; Hu Long
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Incisor inclination changes produced by two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  Robert A Miller; Long Tieu; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of external apical root resorption caused by fixed functional treatment of class II malocclusion : Cast splint Herbst appliance vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device.

Authors:  Gökhan Çoban; Nisa Gül Amuk; Ahmet Yağcı; Gizem Akgün; Ihab Haitham Abbood Abbood
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.