Literature DB >> 12946524

Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius.

Héctor R Guzmán1, Andrew J McNamara, Daniel X Nguyen, Mark R Prausnitz.   

Abstract

Acoustic cavitation has been shown to load drugs, proteins and DNA into viable cells as a complex function of acoustic and nonacoustic parameters. To better understand and quantify this functionality, DU145 prostate cancer cell suspensions at different cell concentrations (2.5 x 10(5) to 4.0 x 10(7) cells/mL) were exposed to 500 kHz ultrasound (US) over a range of acoustic energy exposures (2 to 817 J/cm(2); peak negative pressures of 0.64 to 2.96 MPa; exposure times of 120 to 2000 ms) in the presence of different initial concentrations of Optison contrast agent bubbles (3.6 x 10(4) to 9.3 x 10(7) bubbles/mL). As determined by flow cytometry, molecular uptake of calcein and cell viability both increased with increasing cell density; viability decreased and uptake was unaffected by increasing initial contrast agent concentration. When normalized relative to the initial contrast agent concentration (e.g., cells killed per bubble), bioeffects increased with increasing cell density and decreased with increasing bubble concentration. These varying effects of contrast agent concentration and cell density were unified through an overall correlation with cell-to-bubble ratio. Additional analysis led to estimation of "blast radii" over which bubbles killed or permeabilized cells; these radii were as much as 3 to 90 times the bubble radius. Combined, these results suggest that extensive molecular uptake into cells at high viability occurs for low-energy exposure US applied at a high cell-to-bubble ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946524     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00899-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  29 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review.

Authors:  William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini; Bryant J Staples
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.648

2.  Intracellular delivery of Bak BH3 peptide by microbubble-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  The role of cavitation in acoustically activated drug delivery.

Authors:  Ghaleb A Husseini; Mario A Diaz de la Rosa; Eric S Richardson; Douglas A Christensen; William G Pitt
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Influence of the cell wall on intracellular delivery to algal cells by electroporation and sonication.

Authors:  Harold R Azencott; Gary F Peter; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Effects of extracellular calcium on cell membrane resealing in sonoporation.

Authors:  Yun Zhou; Jingyi Shi; Jianmin Cui; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles.

Authors:  Ruen Shan Leow; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jing Yan; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Acoustic Cavitation-Mediated Delivery of Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acids with Phase-Shift Nano-Emulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation.

Authors:  J D Hutcheson; R K Schlicher; H K Hicks; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.