| Literature DB >> 30635050 |
Tianyue Pan1,2, Hao Liu1,2, Yuan Fang1,2, Zheng Wei3, Shiyang Gu3, Gang Fang1,2, Yifan Liu1,2, Yang Luo1,2, Daqiao Guo1,2, Xin Xu1,2, Bin Chen1,2, Junhao Jiang1,2, Jue Yang1,2, Zhenyu Shi1,2, Ting Zhu1,2, Yun Shi1,2, Peng Liu3, Zhihui Dong4,5, Weiguo Fu6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the mononuclear cell (MNC) transplantation could theoretically induce therapeutic angiogenesis in the patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI), the clinical responses to this approach are inconsistent among different clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of responders and develop a predictive nomogram to guide patient selection.Entities:
Keywords: Critical limb ischemia; Mononuclear cell transplantation; Nomogram; Predictive analysis; Therapeutic angiogenesis
Year: 2019 PMID: 30635050 PMCID: PMC6329149 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-1117-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Study flow diagram. NO-CLI, no-option critical limb ischemia
Baseline characteristics of patients
| Total, | Responders, | Non-responders, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 44.9 ± 13.1 | 43.4 ± 11.2 | 46.8 ± 15.2 | 0.204 |
| 20–29, | 16(15.5%) | 8(13.8%) | 8 (17.8%) | 0.596 |
| 30–39, | 18 (17.5%) | 13 (22.4%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.191 |
| 40–49, | 33 (32.0%) | 24 (41.4%) | 9 (20.0%) | 0.033 |
| 50–59, | 25 (24.3%) | 10 (17.2%) | 15 (33.3%) | 0.068 |
| 60–69, | 4 (3.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (8.9%) | 0.034 |
| 70–79, | 7 (6.8%) | 3 (5.2%) | 4 (8.9%) | 0.696 |
| < 50, | 67 (65.0%) | 45 (77.6%) | 22 (48.9%) | 0.002 |
| ≥ 50, | 36 (35.0%) | 13 (22.4%) | 23 (51.1%) | 0.002 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male, | 101 (98.1%) | 56 (96.6%) | 45 (100.0%) | 0.208 |
| Female, | 2 (1.9%) | 2 (3.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.208 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) (mean ± SD) | 23.3 ± 3.1 | 23.4 ± 3.0 | 23.1 ± 3.3 | 0.630 |
| Etiology of limb ischemia | ||||
| TAO, | 86 (83.5%) | 52 (89.7%) | 34 (75.6%) | 0.056 |
| ASO, | 10 (9.7%) | 3 (5.2%) | 7 (12.1%) | 0.078 |
| Collagen disease, | 4 (3.9%) | 2 (3.4%) | 2 (4.4%) | 0.795 |
| Crohn’s disease, | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.856 |
| Eosinophilia, | 2 (1.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (4.4%) | 0.105 |
| Risk factors of cardiovascular disease | ||||
| Hypertension, | 7 (6.8%) | 2 (3.4%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.125 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 7 (6.8%) | 2 (3.4%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.125 |
| Hyperlipidemia, | 5 (4.9%) | 4 (6.9%) | 1 (2.2%) | 0.274 |
| Smoker, | 85 (82.5%) | 51 (87.8%) | 34 (75.6%) | 0.101 |
| Blood examination | ||||
| Fibrinogen, (mg/dL) (median [IQR]) | 316.0 (255.0–408.0) | 304.5 (238.0–351.0) | 336.0 (278.0–467.0) | 0.012 |
| CRP, (mg/L) (median [IQR]) | 5.40 (1.90–23.00) | 3.75 (1.60–8.50) | 9.50 (4.00–40.80) | 0.001 |
| Glucose, (mmol/L) (median [IQR]) | 4.70 (4.40–5.00) | 4.70 (4.50–5.00) | 4.70 (4.40–5.00) | 0.762 |
| Creatinine, (μmol/L) (median [IQR]) | 72.0 (64.0–83.0) | 73.0 (67.0–83.0) | 70.0 (63.0–76.0) | 0.102 |
| Treatment history | ||||
| Antiplatelet drugs, | 58 (56.3%) | 34 (58.6%) | 24 (53.3%) | 0.592 |
| Vasodilator, | 55 (53.4%) | 33 (56.9%) | 22 (48.9%) | 0.419 |
| Statins, | 4 (3.9%) | 2 (3.4%) | 2 (4.4%) | 0.795 |
| Stenting, | 10 (9.7%) | 5 (8.6%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.672 |
| Balloon dilation, | 7 (6.8%) | 4 (6.9%) | 3 (6.7%) | 0.963 |
| Thrombolysis, | 16(15.5%) | 8(13.8%) | 8 (17.8%) | 0.580 |
| Thrombectomy, | 8 (7.8%) | 3 (5.2%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.264 |
| Bypass surgery, | 5 (4.9%) | 2 (3.4%) | 3 (6.7%) | 0.451 |
| Endarterectomy, | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.376 |
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; TAO, thromboangiitis obliterans; ASO, atherosclerosis obliterans; CRP, C-reaction protein
Baseline characteristics of treated limbs and transplants
| Total, | Responders, | Non-responders, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutherford class, | ||||
| IV | 12 (11.6%) | 5 (8.6%) | 7 (15.6%) | 0.277 |
| V | 91 (88.4%) | 53 (91.4%) | 38 (84.4%) | 0.277 |
| Gangrene, | ||||
| Yes | 46 (44.7%) | 25 (43.1%) | 21 (46.7%) | 0.718 |
| No | 57 (55.3%) | 33 (56.9%) | 24 (53.3%) | 0.718 |
| ABI* (median [IQR]) | 0.485 (0.370–0.640) | 0.515 (0.410–0.695) | 0.430 (0.280–0.540) | 0.011 |
| TcPO2 (mmHg) (median [IQR]) | 17 (6–28) | 24 (14–30) | 9 (4–19) | < 0.001 |
| Highest level of arterial occlusion | ||||
| Above the knee or elbow, | 62 (60.2%) | 28 (46.6%) | 34 (77.8%) | 0.001 |
| Common or external iliac artery, | 4 (3.9%) | 1 (1.7%) | 3 (6.7%) | 0.198 |
| Common femoral artery or axillary artery, | 5 (4.8%) | 4 (6.9%) | 1 (2.2%) | 0.383 |
| Superficial femoral artery or brachial artery, | 36 (35.0%) | 15 (25.9%) | 21 (46.7%) | 0.037 |
| Popliteal artery, | 17 (16.5%) | 7 (12.1%) | 10 (22.2%) | 0.169 |
| Below the knee or elbow, | 41 (39.8%) | 31 (53.4%) | 10 (22.2%) | 0.001 |
| Artery in the calf or forearm, | 28 (27.2%) | 23 (39.7%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.001 |
| Artery below the ankle or wrist, | 13 (12.6%) | 8(13.7%) | 5 (11.1%) | 0.684 |
| Type of transplantation | ||||
| Purified for CD34+ cells, | 52 (50.5%) | 30 (51.7%) | 22 (48.9%) | 0.775 |
| Not purified, | 51 (49.5%) | 28 (48.3%) | 23 (51.1%) | 0.775 |
| Total transplanted CD34+ cells (million/L) (median [IQR]) | 43.0 (26.0–84.0) | 51.5 (26.0–103.0) | 40.0 (26.0–68.0) | 0.114 |
| Cell viability (median [IQR]) | 98.4% (97.7%–98.6%) | 98.3% (97.5%–98.6%) | 98.4% (98.2%–98.6%) | 0.212 |
*ABIs of 99 patients with lower limbs treated were included in this analysis, while the other 4 patients with upper limbs treated were excluded
IQR, interquartile range; ABI, ankle-brachial index; TcPO2: transcutaneous pressure of oxygen; CD, cluster of differentiation
Fig. 2Comparison of longitudinal TcPO2 changes (median with interquartile range) in the ischemic limbs of the responders and non-responders (a) and linear regression between TcPO2 at baseline and at 6 months post-transplantation, depicted with a solid fitting line and dotted 95% confidential interval bars (b). *The difference between 6 months and baseline was statistically significant (P < 0.05). TcPO2, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of prognostic factors
| Candidate variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Age ≥ 50 years | 0.276 (0.118–0.647) | 0.003 | 0.201 (0.068–0.595) | 0.004 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 1.032 (0.909–1.172) | 0.627 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.286 (0.053–1.547) | 0.146 | ||
| Hypertension | 0.286 (0.053–1.547) | 0.146 | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 3.259 (0.351–30.22) | 0.298 | ||
| Smoker | 2.357 (0.831–6.684) | 0.107 | ||
| CRP > 3 mg/L | 0.287 (0.117–0.702) | 0.006 | ||
| Fibrinogen > 4 g/L | 0.172 (0.064–0.459) | < 0.001 | 0.176 (0.055–0.563) | 0.003 |
| Etiology = ASO | 0.296 (0.072–1.218) | 0.092 | ||
| Rutherford class = IV | 0.512 (0.151–1.736) | 0.283 | ||
| Gangrene | 0.866 (0.396–1.894) | 0.718 | ||
| Arterial occlusion above the knee or elbow* | 0.249 (0.104–0.595) | 0.002 | 0.232 (0.077–0.703) | 0.010 |
| ABI** | 8.345 (1.301–53.54) | 0.025 | ||
| TcPO2 (mmHg) | 1.069 (1.030–1.109) | < 0.001 | 1.062 (1.017–1.110) | 0.006 |
| Using purified CD34+ cells | 0.913 (0.425–1.961) | 0.816 | ||
| Log (total transplanted CD34+ cell counts)*** | 2.274 (0.850–6.079) | 0.102 | 3.506 (1.021–12.039) | 0.046 |
*Defined as the highest occlusion level located at common iliac artery, external iliac artery, common femoral artery, superficial femoral artery, popliteal artery, axillary artery, or brachial artery
**ABIs of 99 patients with lower limbs treated were included in this analysis, while the other 4 patients with upper limb lesions were excluded
*** Base-10 logarithm of total transplanted CD34+ cell counts
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidential interval; CRP, C-reaction protein; ASO, atherosclerosis obliterans; ABI, ankle-brachial index; TcPO2: transcutaneous pressure of oxygen; CD, cluster of differentiation
Fig. 3Nomogram predicting responders to mononuclear cell transplantation for no-option critical limb ischemia. Each variable is given a score by projecting its status to the upper point of the scale (0–100) with a straight line. Based on a total score calculated by summing the whole scores of the 5 variables, the predicted probability can be determined by projecting the total score line straight to the probability scale line at the bottom. Log, Base-10 logarithm; TcPO2, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen; CD, cluster of differentiation
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to address the sensitivity and specificity of the nomogram, with an area under the curve of 0.851 (a) and bias-corrected calibration curve with 1000 cycles of bootstrap resampling to indicate good agreement between the predicted probability and the observed probability of responders (b). AUC, area under the curve
Fig. 5Typical preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and longitudinal foot photos of a responder (a, b, c) and a non-responder (d, e, f). The case on the left side was a 37-year-old male diagnosed with thromboangiitis obliterans, characterized by progressive limb gangrene (b), occlusion level at popliteal artery (a), transcutaneous oxygen pressure of 15 mmHg, Log transplanted CD34+ cells of 8.17, and baseline blood fibrinogen < 4 g/L. The nomogram-based score was 192, indicating a probability of 0.76 to be a responder. His toe gangrene was debrided during the transplantation, and the wound healed completely within 6 months (c). The case on the right side was a 73-year-old male diagnosed with atherosclerosis obliterans, characterized by left foot rest pain, occlusion level at proximal superficial femoral artery (f), transcutaneous oxygen pressure of 12 mmHg, Log transplanted CD34+ cells of 7.38, and baseline blood fibrinogen < 4 g/L. The nomogram-based score was 110, indicating a probability of 0.18 to be a responder. His rest pain was not relieved and the fourth and fifth toes had gangrene at 6 months (e). The white arrows indicate the arterial occlusion level