OBJECTIVE: To investigate the threshold of transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO(2)) values in predicting ulcer healing in patients with critical limb ischaemia in a prospective study. METHOD: 50 patients suffering from critical limb ischaemia with chronic ischemic ulcers or gangrenous toes were enrolled in this study between January and December 2008. Their demographic data and ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) were collected. Baseline ulcers were measured with a wound measurement system (Visitrak, Smith & Nephew). TcPO(2) was measured at rest in the supine position and with 30 degrees leg elevation. The patients with infective and ischemic ulcers underwent debridement and gangrenous toes were amputated. Ulcer outcome was classified as either: (1) A healing ulcer, showing good epithelialisation or granulation at both base and edges, or a decrease in ulcer area during the study; or (2) A non-healing ulcer, showing poor granulation tissue formation or a pale base and necrotic edges, or deterioration in an ischaemic ulcer. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67.6 + or - 10.8 years. The most common risk factor was hypertension (90%). Mean ABPI was 0.75 + or - 0.39. 13 patients (26%) had a TcPO(2) of less than 20 mmHg, of which none showed any improvement in ulcer healing (p<0.001). 15 patients (30%) had a TcPO(2) of more than 40 mmHg, of which all progressed to complete ulcer healing (p<0.001). In the borderline group (20-40 mmHg, 22 patients, 44%), 10 patients (45%) had a TcPO2 drop of <10 mmHg with 30 degrees leg elevation, of which 8 achieved complete ulcer healing (p<0.001). 12 patients (55%) had a TcPO(2) drop of >10 mmHg with 30 degrees leg elevation, of which 11 showed no ulcer healing (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: TcPO(2) measurement is an accurate, non-invasive, and good predictor of ischemic ulcer healing, for cut-off TcPO(2) values of less than 20 mmHg and more than 40 mmHg. In addition, the leg elevation method for TcPO(2) might provide an important adjunct in the assessment of patients with borderline values.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the threshold of transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO(2)) values in predicting ulcer healing in patients with critical limb ischaemia in a prospective study. METHOD: 50 patients suffering from critical limb ischaemia with chronic ischemic ulcers or gangrenous toes were enrolled in this study between January and December 2008. Their demographic data and ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) were collected. Baseline ulcers were measured with a wound measurement system (Visitrak, Smith & Nephew). TcPO(2) was measured at rest in the supine position and with 30 degrees leg elevation. The patients with infective and ischemic ulcers underwent debridement and gangrenous toes were amputated. Ulcer outcome was classified as either: (1) A healing ulcer, showing good epithelialisation or granulation at both base and edges, or a decrease in ulcer area during the study; or (2) A non-healing ulcer, showing poor granulation tissue formation or a pale base and necrotic edges, or deterioration in an ischaemic ulcer. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67.6 + or - 10.8 years. The most common risk factor was hypertension (90%). Mean ABPI was 0.75 + or - 0.39. 13 patients (26%) had a TcPO(2) of less than 20 mmHg, of which none showed any improvement in ulcer healing (p<0.001). 15 patients (30%) had a TcPO(2) of more than 40 mmHg, of which all progressed to complete ulcer healing (p<0.001). In the borderline group (20-40 mmHg, 22 patients, 44%), 10 patients (45%) had a TcPO2 drop of <10 mmHg with 30 degrees leg elevation, of which 8 achieved complete ulcer healing (p<0.001). 12 patients (55%) had a TcPO(2) drop of >10 mmHg with 30 degrees leg elevation, of which 11 showed no ulcer healing (p<0.001). CONCLUSION:TcPO(2) measurement is an accurate, non-invasive, and good predictor of ischemiculcer healing, for cut-off TcPO(2) values of less than 20 mmHg and more than 40 mmHg. In addition, the leg elevation method for TcPO(2) might provide an important adjunct in the assessment of patients with borderline values.
Authors: Adriaan R Thomas; Jelle W Raats; Mare M A Lensvelt; Hans G W de Groot; Eelco J Veen; Lijckle van der Laan Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Zongxi Li; Emmanuel Roussakis; Pieter G L Koolen; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Kuylhee Kim; Lloyd F Rose; Jesse Wu; Alexander J Nichols; Yunjung Baek; Reginald Birngruber; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea; Robina Matyal; Thomas Huang; Rodney Chan; Samuel J Lin; Conor L Evans Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Garth A James; Alice Ge Zhao; Marcia Usui; Robert A Underwood; Hung Nguyen; Haluk Beyenal; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Alessandra Agostinho Hunt; Hans C Bernstein; Philip Fleckman; John Olerud; Kerry S Williamson; Michael J Franklin; Philip S Stewart Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Daniel Naveed Tavakol; Samantha C Schwager; Lindsay A Jeffries; Anthony Bruce; Bruce A Corliss; Christopher A DeRosa; Cassandra L Fraser; Shayn M Peirce; Patrick S Cottler Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.373