Erwin Dreesen1, Ruben Faelens2, Gert Van Assche3, Marc Ferrante3, Séverine Vermeire3, Ann Gils1, Thomas Bouillon2. 1. Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
AIMS: The therapeutic failure of infliximab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis remains a challenge even 2 decades after its approval. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has shown value during maintenance therapy, but induction therapy has still not been explored. Patients may be primary nonresponders or underexposed with the standard dosing regimen. We aimed to: (i) develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model; (ii) identify the best exposure metric that predicts mucosal healing; and (iii) build an exposure-response (ER) model to demonstrate model-based dose finding during induction therapy with infliximab. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from a clinical database. A total of 583 samples, from 204 patients, was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to generate exposure metrics for subsequent ER modelling. A subset of 159 patients was used to develop a logistic regression ER model, describing the relationship between infliximab exposure and ordered transitions between Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 3, 2 and ≤1 (baseline to post-induction). RESULTS: A 1-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with interindividual and interoccasion variability was found to fit the data best. Covariates influencing exposure were C-reactive protein, albumin, baseline MES, fat-free mass, concomitant corticosteroid use and pancolitis. The cumulative area under the infliximab concentration-time curve until endoscopy (CAUCendoscopy ) was found to be the best exposure metric for predicting mucosal healing (baseline MES >1 and post-induction MES ≤1). The model predicted that 70% of patients will attain mucosal healing with infliximab administered at days 0, 14 and 42 and a target CAUCendoscopy of 3752 mg/L*day at day 84. CONCLUSIONS: TDM-based dose individualisation targeting CAUCendoscopy has the potential to improve the effectiveness of infliximab during induction therapy.
AIMS: The therapeutic failure of infliximab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis remains a challenge even 2 decades after its approval. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has shown value during maintenance therapy, but induction therapy has still not been explored. Patients may be primary nonresponders or underexposed with the standard dosing regimen. We aimed to: (i) develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model; (ii) identify the best exposure metric that predicts mucosal healing; and (iii) build an exposure-response (ER) model to demonstrate model-based dose finding during induction therapy with infliximab. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from a clinical database. A total of 583 samples, from 204 patients, was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to generate exposure metrics for subsequent ER modelling. A subset of 159 patients was used to develop a logistic regression ER model, describing the relationship between infliximab exposure and ordered transitions between Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 3, 2 and ≤1 (baseline to post-induction). RESULTS: A 1-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with interindividual and interoccasion variability was found to fit the data best. Covariates influencing exposure were C-reactive protein, albumin, baseline MES, fat-free mass, concomitant corticosteroid use and pancolitis. The cumulative area under the infliximab concentration-time curve until endoscopy (CAUCendoscopy ) was found to be the best exposure metric for predicting mucosal healing (baseline MES >1 and post-induction MES ≤1). The model predicted that 70% of patients will attain mucosal healing with infliximab administered at days 0, 14 and 42 and a target CAUCendoscopy of 3752 mg/L*day at day 84. CONCLUSIONS: TDM-based dose individualisation targeting CAUCendoscopy has the potential to improve the effectiveness of infliximab during induction therapy.
Authors: Geert D'Haens; Severine Vermeire; Guy Lambrecht; Filip Baert; Peter Bossuyt; Benjamin Pariente; Anthony Buisson; Yoram Bouhnik; Jérôme Filippi; Janneke Vander Woude; Philippe Van Hootegem; Jacques Moreau; Edouard Louis; Denis Franchimont; Martine De Vos; Fazia Mana; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Hedia Brixi; Matthieu Allez; Philip Caenepeel; Alexandre Aubourg; Bas Oldenburg; Marieke Pierik; Ann Gils; Sylvie Chevret; David Laharie Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: N Vande Casteele; D J Buurman; M G G Sturkenboom; J H Kleibeuker; S Vermeire; T Rispens; D van der Kleij; A Gils; G Dijkstra Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Konstantinos Papamichael; Thomas Van Stappen; Niels Vande Casteele; Ann Gils; Thomas Billiet; Sophie Tops; Karolien Claes; Gert Van Assche; Paul Rutgeerts; Severine Vermeire; Marc Ferrante Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Omoniyi J Adedokun; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Zhenhua Xu; Colleen W Marano; Jewel Johanns; Honghui Zhou; Hugh M Davis; Freddy Cornillie; Walter Reinisch Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Johannan F Brandse; Ron A Mathôt; Desiree van der Kleij; Theo Rispens; Yaël Ashruf; Jeroen M Jansen; Svend Rietdijk; Mark Löwenberg; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Sharat Singh; Gijs R van den Brink; Geert R D'Haens Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Wannee Kantasiripitak; An Outtier; Sebastian G Wicha; Alexander Kensert; Zhigang Wang; João Sabino; Séverine Vermeire; Debby Thomas; Marc Ferrante; Erwin Dreesen Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: Hsuan Ping Chang; Valentina Shakhnovich; Adam Frymoyer; Ryan Sol Funk; Mara L Becker; K T Park; Dhaval K Shah Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Ana-Marija Grišić; Maria Dorn-Rasmussen; Bella Ungar; Jørn Brynskov; Johan F K F Ilvemark; Nils Bolstad; David J Warren; Mark A Ainsworth; Wilhelm Huisinga; Shomron Ben-Horin; Charlotte Kloft; Casper Steenholdt Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 4.623