| Literature DB >> 30633680 |
Renee Pekmezaris1, Leanne Tortez2, Myia Williams3, Vidhi Patel4, Amgad Makaryus5, Roman Zeltser6, Liron Sinvani7, Gisele Wolf-Klein8, Janice Lester9, Cristina Sison10, Martin Lesser11, Andrzej Kozikowski12.
Abstract
We conducted a meta-analysis of twenty-six randomized controlled trials that tested the effectiveness of home telemonitoring in patients with heart failure for reducing mortality and hospital use. We used the PICOT framework as a tool to address an important variable not previously studied: the timing or duration of monitoring. Specifically, we found that home telemonitoring decreased the odds of all-cause mortality and heart failure-related mortality at 180 days but not at 365 days. Home telemonitoring did not significantly affect the odds of all-cause hospitalization at 90 or 180 days, or of heart failure-related hospitalization at 180 days. At 180 days, home telemonitoring significantly increased the odds of all-cause emergency department visits. Home care provision did not moderate the effects of home telemonitoring on all-cause hospitalization. Recent regulatory changes that relaxed Medicare restrictions on telehealth reimbursement make it imperative that studies fully describe outcomes (for example, heart failure-related versus all-cause hospitalizations) and deliberately test all essential intervention elements, such as intervention duration.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30633680 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301