Neal Yuan1, Patrick G Botting1, Yaron Elad1,2, Shaun J Miller3,2, Susan Cheng1, Joseph E Ebinger1, Michelle M Kittleson1. 1. Smidt Heart Institute (N.Y., P.G.B., Y.E., S.C., J.E.E., M.M.K.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 2. Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences (Y.E., S.J.M.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 3. Department of Medicine (S.J.M.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An unprecedented shift to remote heart failure outpatient care occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given challenges inherent to remote care, we studied whether remote visits (video or telephone) were associated with different patient usage, clinician practice patterns, and outcomes. METHODS: We included all ambulatory cardiology visits for heart failure at a multisite health system from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) or April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (COVID era), resulting in 10 591 pre-COVID in-person, 7775 COVID-era in-person, 1009 COVID-era video, and 2322 COVID-era telephone visits. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions with propensity weighting and patient clustering to study ordering practices and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with in-person visits, video visits were used more often by younger (mean 64.7 years [SD 14.5] versus 74.2 [14.1]), male (68.3% versus 61.4%), and privately insured (45.9% versus 28.9%) individuals (P<0.05 for all). Remote visits were more frequently used by non-White patients (35.8% video, 37.0% telephone versus 33.2% in-person). During remote visits, clinicians were less likely to order diagnostic testing (odds ratio, 0.20 [0.18-0.22] video versus in-person, 0.18 [0.17-0.19] telephone versus in-person) or prescribe β-blockers (0.82 [0.68-0.99], 0.35 [0.26-0.47]), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0.69 [0.50-0.96], 0.48 [0.35-0.66]), or loop diuretics (0.67 [0.53-0.85], 0.45 [0.37-0.55]). During telephone visits, clinicians were less likely to prescribe ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers)/ARNIs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; 0.54 [0.40-0.72]). Telephone visits but not video visits were associated with higher rates of 90-day mortality (1.82 [1.14-2.90]) and nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of 90-day heart failure emergency department visits (1.34 [0.97-1.86]) and hospitalizations (1.36 [0.98-1.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Remote visits for heart failure care were associated with reduced diagnostic testing and guideline-directed medical therapy prescription. Telephone but not video visits were associated with increased 90-day mortality.
BACKGROUND: An unprecedented shift to remote heart failure outpatient care occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given challenges inherent to remote care, we studied whether remote visits (video or telephone) were associated with different patient usage, clinician practice patterns, and outcomes. METHODS: We included all ambulatory cardiology visits for heart failure at a multisite health system from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) or April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (COVID era), resulting in 10 591 pre-COVID in-person, 7775 COVID-era in-person, 1009 COVID-era video, and 2322 COVID-era telephone visits. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions with propensity weighting and patient clustering to study ordering practices and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with in-person visits, video visits were used more often by younger (mean 64.7 years [SD 14.5] versus 74.2 [14.1]), male (68.3% versus 61.4%), and privately insured (45.9% versus 28.9%) individuals (P<0.05 for all). Remote visits were more frequently used by non-White patients (35.8% video, 37.0% telephone versus 33.2% in-person). During remote visits, clinicians were less likely to order diagnostic testing (odds ratio, 0.20 [0.18-0.22] video versus in-person, 0.18 [0.17-0.19] telephone versus in-person) or prescribe β-blockers (0.82 [0.68-0.99], 0.35 [0.26-0.47]), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0.69 [0.50-0.96], 0.48 [0.35-0.66]), or loop diuretics (0.67 [0.53-0.85], 0.45 [0.37-0.55]). During telephone visits, clinicians were less likely to prescribe ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers)/ARNIs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; 0.54 [0.40-0.72]). Telephone visits but not video visits were associated with higher rates of 90-day mortality (1.82 [1.14-2.90]) and nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of 90-day heart failure emergency department visits (1.34 [0.97-1.86]) and hospitalizations (1.36 [0.98-1.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Remote visits for heart failure care were associated with reduced diagnostic testing and guideline-directed medical therapy prescription. Telephone but not video visits were associated with increased 90-day mortality.
Authors: Saurabh Aggarwal; Nelson Garcia-Telles; Gaurav Aggarwal; Carl Lavie; Giuseppe Lippi; Brandon Michael Henry Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Michele Jonsson Funk; Daniel Westreich; Chris Wiesen; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart; Marie Davidian Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Eiran Z Gorodeski; Laurie Ann Moennich; Haris Riaz; Lara Jehi; James B Young; W H Wilson Tang Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: William T Abraham; Philip B Adamson; Robert C Bourge; Mark F Aaron; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Lynne W Stevenson; Warren Strickland; Suresh Neelagaru; Nirav Raval; Steven Krueger; Stanislav Weiner; David Shavelle; Bradley Jeffries; Jay S Yadav Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Charlotte Andersson; Thomas Gerds; Emil Fosbøl; Matthew Phelps; Julie Andersen; Morten Lamberts; Anders Holt; Jawad H Butt; Christian Madelaire; Gunnar Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Køber; Morten Schou Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Lauren A Eberly; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Ashwin S Nathan; Christopher Snider; Howard M Julien; Mary Elizabeth Deleener; Srinath Adusumalli Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Yasbanoo Moayedi; Ana C Alba; Douglas S Lee; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Heather J Ross Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Antonio Cannatà; Daniel I Bromage; Irfan A Rind; Caterina Gregorio; Clare Bannister; Mohammed Albarjas; Susan Piper; Ajay M Shah; Theresa A McDonagh Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 17.349