Literature DB >> 30619505

PIK3CA mutations are frequent in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma associated with chagasic megaesophagus and are associated with a worse patient outcome.

Fernanda Franco Munari1, Adriana Cruvinel-Carloni1, Croider Franco Lacerda1,2, Antônio Talvane Torres de Oliveira2, Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto1,3, Sandra Regina Morini da Silva3, Eduardo Crema4, Sheila Jorge Adad4, Maria Aparecida Marchesan Rodrigues5, Maria Aparecida Coelho Arruda Henry5, Denise Peixoto Guimarães1,6, Adhemar Longatto-Filho1,7,8,9, Rui Manuel Reis1,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases such as chagasic megaesophagus (secondary to Chagas' disease) have been suggested as etiological factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; however, the molecular mechanisms involved are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed hotspot PIK3CA gene mutations in a series of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas associated or not with chagasic megaesophagus, as well as, in chagasic megaesophagus biopsies. We also checked for correlations between the presence of PIK3CA mutations with patients' clinical and pathological features.
METHODS: The study included three different groups of patients: i) 23 patients with chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CM/ESCC); ii) 38 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma not associated with chagasic megaesophagus (ESCC); and iii) 28 patients with chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CM). PIK3CA hotspot mutations in exons 9 and 20 were evaluated by PCR followed by direct sequencing technique.
RESULTS: PIK3CA mutations were identified in 21.7% (5 out of 23) of CM/ESCC cases, in 10.5% (4 out of 38) of ESCC and in only 3.6% (1 case out of 28) of CM cases. In the CM/ESCC group, PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with lower survival (mean 5 months), when compared to wild-type patients (mean 2.0 years). No other significant associations were observed between PIK3CA mutations and patients' clinical features or TP53 mutation profile.
CONCLUSION: This is the first report on the presence of PIK3CA mutations in esophageal cancer associated with chagasic megaesophagus. The detection of PIK3CA mutations in benign chagasic megaesophagus lesions suggests their putative role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma development and opens new opportunities for targeted-therapies for these diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Chagasic megaesophagus; Esophageal cancer; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Mutation; PIK3CA; Trypanosoma cruzi

Year:  2018        PMID: 30619505      PMCID: PMC6311070          DOI: 10.1186/s13027-018-0216-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer        ISSN: 1750-9378            Impact factor:   2.965


Introduction

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most frequent type of cancer in the world and the sixth most lethal, occurring mainly in developing countries such as Brazil [1]. The most frequent histological subtype is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), accounting for 90% of cases, especially in high-risk areas [2]. The main risk factors for ESCC are alcohol consumption, tobacco (mainly in association) and hot-beverage consumption [3]. It is also reported that chronic diseases, such as the chagasic megaesophagus, can be associated with ESCC development [4]. Chagasic megaesophagus is the late manifestation of Chagas’ disease (caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi) [5]. Direct infection of Trypanosoma cruzi will lead to destruction of the intramural myenteric neurons in the esophagus, causing inflammation and production of neurotoxins. This will result in uncoordinated contractions and reduction of peristalsis of the organ, altering the functioning of the lower esophageal sphincter and progressive dilation of the esophagus (megaesophagus) [6]. In Brazil, one of the endemic regions of Chagas’ disease, approximately 4 million people are infected with the parasite and about 6–7% of these patients will develop chagasic megaesophagus [5]. Patients affected with this lesion are more likely to develop ESCC (3–10%) when compared to the general population [4]. The carcinogenic mechanisms of ESCC development in the context of chagasic megaesophagus have been little explored. Recently, our group showed the high frequency (13/32, 40.6%) of TP53 mutations in ESCC associated with chagasic megaesophagus [7]. Moreover, we also reported the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in a small fraction (1/19, 5.3%) of cases [8]. However, many other genes are known to be involved in ESCC carcinogenesis as demonstrated by the TCGA consortium [9]. One of these genes is the PI3KCA, which encodes the protein phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), that belongs to a family of lipid kinases that encodes the p110α catalytic subunit [10]. PI3K is a quite complex signaling pathway since it regulates cell growth, proliferation, cell motility, the production of new proteins, apoptosis and cell survival [10]. Therefore, its activation will lead to many downstream pathways that regulate several cellular functions, including those involved in the development of cancer [10, 11]. Recurrent PI3KCA oncogenic mutations were identified in several types of tumors, including colorectal, breast, ovary, gastric, and recently in ESSC [12]. The mutations occur mainly in exons 9 (E542K and E545K) and 20 (H1047R) [12]. Recently, it was shown that PIK3CA mutations, namely H1047R, also disrupt cellular genetic stability, increasing the frequency of chromosomal errors and leading to tetraploidy [13]. Importantly, therapeutic strategies targeting the PIK3/Akt signaling pathway have been developed and could constitute effective treatment options for patients harboring PI3KCA mutations [14]. Therefore, in the current study we performed the mutation analysis of PIK3CA gene in patients with ESCC and chagasic megaesophagus associated or not with ESCC, and searched for associations between the mutation status and patients’ clinical and pathological features.

Materials and methods

Study population

In this retrospective study, we analyzed 89 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of three groups of patients: i) 23 patients with chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CM/ESCC); ii) 38 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus (ESCC); and iii) 28 patients with chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CM). All chagasic megaesophagus patients were serologic positive for Chagas’ disease and/or had exams (imaging and histopathology) that confirmed the presence of megaesophagus. The patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus were all serologic negative for Chagas’ disease and had exams (imaging and histopathology) that confirmed malignant disease. These patients were previously described for their clinical-pathological and molecular TP53 and MSI features [7, 8]. The samples were obtained from patients treated between 1990 and 2016 in three different institutions from the Southeast of Brazil, namely: Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo State; Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais State and São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State. All clinical and pathological information was obtained through medical record review.

DNA isolation

Following tissue macro-dissection, DNA was isolated from FFPE tissue representative of the tumor lesions in ESCC and CM/ESCC groups and esophageal tissues in CM group, as previously described [7]. Briefly, the tumor area was delineated in a hematoxylin-eosin stained (HE, Merck KGaA, GE) section by a pathologist, and the marked area was scraped by scalp from 3 to 5 10 μm unstained slides into a 1,5 ml tube. Afterwards, the tissue was subjected to the dewaxing step by heating (80 °C – 20 min), followed by sequential washing in xylol (5 min) and decreasing concentrations of ethanol (1 min - 100, 70 and 50%) and nuclease-free water9 (1 min). DNA isolation was performed using the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacture’s protocol.

PIK3CA mutation analysis

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by direct sequencing (Sanger method) was performed for the analysis of hotspot mutations (exons 9 and 20) of the PIK3CA gene as previously described [15]. The PCR was performed on the 89 samples under the following conditions: 5X Flexi Buffer (pH 8.5) and 25 mM MgCl2 (Promega, USA), 200 μM dNTPmix (Invitrogen, USA), 200 nM primers exon 9 (forward 5’-CTGTGAATCCAGAGGGGAAA-3′ and reverse 5’-ACATGCTGAGATCAGCCAAAT-3′) and exon 20 (forward 5’-ATGATGCTTGGCTCTGGAAT-3′ and reverse 5’-GGTCTTTGCCTGCTGAGAGT-3′), 1.25 U GoTaq®Hot Start Polymerase (Promega, USA), and nuclease-free water (Gibco, BRL, Life Technologies, USA) in a final volume of 25 μl and 5 μl of DNA at 50 ng/μl from each patient were added [15]. Amplification was performed in a thermocycler according to the protocol: 96 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles at 96 °C for 45 s, 55.5 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s and final extension of 72 °C for 10 min, followed by a hold at 4 °C. PCR products were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with Gel Red (Biotium, Hayward, CA) to evaluate the amplification of the gene of interest. After agarose gel validation, we purified the preparation using the enzyme ExoSap-IT (GE Technology, Cleveland, USA), followed by the sequencing reaction using BigDye Terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, USA) and 3.2 μM of specific primers and re-purified with xTerminator (Life Technology). The products were sequenced using the 3500 series Genetic Analyzer Capillary Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA). All the cases that showed mutations were confirmed with a new PCR reaction and direct sequencing.

Statistical analysis

Characterization of the study population was performed through frequency tables for qualitative variables, and measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum) for the quantitative variables, comparing the different groups. To verify the association between PIK3CA mutation status and clinical groups, pathological and molecular features, Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were applied. We performed an overallsurvival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier limit estimator and the Log-rank test to compare the survival curves between the groups. The level of significance adopted was 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Statistical analyzes were in SPSS software v.21.0.

Results

Characterization of the population

The clinical-pathological characteristics of the patients in the three groups are described in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was higher in the chagasic groups (Table 1). As already reported in our previous studies [7], concerning risk factors for esophageal cancer, the ESCC and CM/ESCC groups were statistically associated with higher tobacco and alcohol consumption (Table 1).
Table 1

The clinical-pathological features of the three groups of patients

VariableGroups (n = 89)
CategoryCM/ESCC (n = 23)ESCC (n = 38)CM (n = 28)p-value
GenderFemale4 (17.4%)7 (18.4%)4 (14.3%)0.937**
Male19 (82.6%)31 (81.6%)24 (85.7%)
Age (years)Mean (SD)59 (11)57 (9)59 (11) 0.039 ***
Min - Max37–7636–7537–76
Alcohol consumptionNo7 (31.8%)8 (21.1%)20 (71.4%) < 0.001 *
Yes15 (68.2%)30 (78.9%)8 (28.6%)
Missing1100
Tobacco consumptionNo4 (18.2%)6 (15.8%)16 (57.1%) < 0.001 *
Yes18 (81.8%)32 (84.2%)12 (42.9%)
Missing100
Tumor differentiationWell differentiated5 (22.7%)7 (19.4%)NA0.639**
Moderate differentiated16 (72.7%)24 (66.7%)NA
Poorly differentiated1 (4.5%)5 (13.9%)NA
Missing12NA
TNM StagingI/II4 (23.5%)16 (42.1%)NA0.235*
III/IV13 (76.5%)22 (57.9%)NA
Missing60NA
Megaesophagus gradesGI/GII10 (45.5%)NA4 (14.3%) 0.025 *
GIII/GIV12 (54.5%)NA24 (85.7%)
Missing1NA0

*Chi-square association test; **Fisher’s exact test; ***Analysis of variance. CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CM – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; SD - standard deviation; NA – not applicable; Bold numbers - statistical significance 

The clinical-pathological features of the three groups of patients *Chi-square association test; **Fisher’s exact test; ***Analysis of variance. CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CM – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; SD - standard deviation; NA – not applicable; Bold numbers - statistical significance

Mutation analysis of PIK3CA gene

The PIK3CA mutation analysis showed the presence of mutations in 21.7% of patients in CM/ESCC group, followed by 10.5% in ESCC group and 3.6% in CM group (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The frequency of mutations was similar in exons 9 and 20 (Table 3). With the exception of three variants (A1027D, K1030R and T1053K), all the other mutations have already been reported in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer database – COSMIC (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic) (Fig. 2 and Table 3).
Fig. 1

Electropherogram of PIK3CA gene. Exon 9 – wild-type sequence and mutated sequence (D549H). Exon 20 – wild-type sequence and mutated sequence (H1047R)

Table 2

Frequency of PIK3CA mutations in the three study groups

VariableGroups (n = 89)
CategoryCM/ESCC (n = 23)ESCC (n = 38)CM (n = 28)p-value
PIK3CA geneWT18 (78.3%)34 (89.5%)27 (96.4%)0.132**
MUT5 (21.7%)4 (10.5%)1 (3.6%)

**Fisher’s exact test. CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CM – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. WT – wild-type; MUT – mutant; N – number of cases

Table 3

Profile of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in the three study groups

GroupSample IDExonCodonCodon (WT – MUT)Type of mutationAmino acids changeNature of mutationCOSMIC ID
CM/ESCC111 T9545GAG – GCAA → CE545AMissenseCOSM12458
122 T9549GAT – CATG → CD549HMissenseCOSM219119
114 T201027GCC – GACC → AA1027DMissenseNot reported
119 T201047CAT – CTTA → TH1047LMissenseCOSM776
124 T201047CAT–CGTA → GH1047RMissenseCOSM775
ESCC26 T9545GAG – GCGA → CE545AMissenseCOSM12458
120 T9555AGG – AAGG → AR555KMissenseCOSM1716158
36 T9524AGG – AAGG → AR524KMissenseCOSM53245
4 T201030AAA – AGAA → GK1030RMissenseNot reported
CME101 M201053ACA – AAAC → AT1053KMissenseNot reported

CME/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CME – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A – adenine; C – cytosine; G – guanine; T – thymine. WT – wild-type; MUT – mutant

Fig. 2

PIK3CA protein and missense mutation overview

Electropherogram of PIK3CA gene. Exon 9 – wild-type sequence and mutated sequence (D549H). Exon 20 – wild-type sequence and mutated sequence (H1047R) Frequency of PIK3CA mutations in the three study groups **Fisher’s exact test. CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CM – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. WT – wild-type; MUT – mutant; N – number of cases Profile of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in the three study groups CME/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CME – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A – adenine; C – cytosine; G – guanine; T – thymine. WT – wild-type; MUT – mutant PIK3CA protein and missense mutation overview No significant associations were observed between the PIK3CA mutation status and patients pathological features (Table 4). Furthermore, we assessed the role of PIK3CA mutations on patients’ overall survival in both groups affected by cancer (CM/ESCC and ESCC) (Fig. 3). In CM/ESCC group, we observed that the presence of PIK3CA mutations was significantly associated with a lower survival rate from the diagnosis of cancer compared to wild-type patients (Fig. 3a). The mean patients’ overall survival in cases from the CM/ESCC group mutated for the PIK3CA was 5 months, in comparison with 2.0 years for wild-type PIK3CA patients (Log-rank, p < 0.001) (Table 5).
Table 4

Association between PIK3CA mutation status with main clinical-pathological features in the three groups

VariablePIK3CA gene
CM/ESCC groupESCC groupCM group
CategoryWTMUTp-valueWTMUTp-valueWTMUTp-value
Alcohol consumptionNo6 (35.3%)1 (20%)1.000**7 (21.2%)1 (20%)1.000**19 (70.4%)1 (100%)1.000**
Yes11 (64.7%)4 (80%)26 (78.8%)4 (80%)8 (29.6%)0 (0%)
Tobacco consumptionNo4 (23.5%)0 (0%)0.535**5 (15.2%)1 (20%)1.000**15 (100%)1 (100%)1.000**
Yes13 (76.5%)5 (100%)28 (84.8%)4 (80%)12 (44.4%)0 (0%)
Tumor differentiationWell4 (22.2%)1 (25%)1.000**7 (22.6%)0 (0%)0.171**NANANA
Moderate13 (72.2%)3 (75%)21 (67.7%)3 (60%)NANA
Poorly1 (5.6%)0 (0%)3 (9.7%)2 (40%)NANA
TNM StagingI e II4 (28.6%)0 (0%)0.541**15 (46.9%)1 (20%)0.421**NANANA
III e IV10 (71.4%)3 (100%)17 (53.1%)4 (80%)NANA
Megaesophagus degreeGI/GII7 (41.2%)3 (60%)0.406**NANANA3 (11.1%)1 (100%)0.143**
GIII/GIV10 (58.8%)2 (40%)NANA24 (88.9%)0 (0%)
TP53 gene [7]WT9 (50%)2 (40%)1.000**20 (60.6%)2 (40%)0.632**26 (96.3%)1 (100%)1.000**
MUT9 (50%)3 (60%)13 (39.4%)3 (60%)1 (3.7%)0 (0%)

**Fisher’s exact test; ***Analysis of variance. CME/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CME – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. N – number of cases; SD – standard deviation; NA – not applicable; WT – wild-type; MUT – mutated

Fig. 3

Cumulative survival of patients associated with the PIK3CA gene status. The red curves represent patients with mutation and the blue curves represent wild-type patients. a CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus; b ESCC – squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus; MUT – mutant; WT – wild-type

Table 5

The time and average of patients’ overall survival according to PIK3CA mutation status

GroupsTime
VariableTotalN events6 months1 year3 years5 yearsMedian survivalp-value
CM/ESCCWT131079.4%72.2%43.3%28.9%2 years < 0.001 *
MUT5520.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%5 months
ESCCWT242282.6%64.7%32.6%14.5%2 years0.405
MUT4480.0%80.0%60.0%0.0%2.5 years

*Log-rank test. CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; WT – wild-type; MUT – mutated; Bold numbers - statistical significance

Association between PIK3CA mutation status with main clinical-pathological features in the three groups **Fisher’s exact test; ***Analysis of variance. CME/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; CME – chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. N – number of cases; SD – standard deviation; NA – not applicable; WT – wild-type; MUT – mutated Cumulative survival of patients associated with the PIK3CA gene status. The red curves represent patients with mutation and the blue curves represent wild-type patients. a CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus; b ESCC – squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus; MUT – mutant; WT – wild-type The time and average of patients’ overall survival according to PIK3CA mutation status *Log-rank test. CM/ESCC – chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC – esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus; WT – wild-type; MUT – mutated; Bold numbers - statistical significance Additionally, we evaluated the association of PIK3CA and TP53 mutation status, and no association was found (Table 4).

Discussion

Among the several risk factors for the development of ESCC, the chagasic megaesophagus (late complication of Chagas’ disease) has been a minor etiological factor and little explored [4]. Nevertheless, Chagas’ disease is still an important public health problem, particularly in Latin-America, where approximately 20 million people are infected with Chagas’ disease and approximately 6–7% of these people will develop chagasic megaesophagus [5, 16]. In the present study, we investigated the frequency of PIK3CA mutations in regions of hotspot (exons 9 and 20) in patients with chagasic megaesophagus associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CM/ESCC) and compared with patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without chagasic megaesophagus (ESCC) and patients with chagasic megaesophagus without esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CM). We observed that patients in the CM/ESCC group had a higher frequency of mutations (5/23, 21.7%) followed by patients in the ESCC group (4/38, 10.5%), and in the CM group (1/28, 3.6%). This is the first report of PIK3CA mutation in ESCC that developed in the context of chagasic megaesophagus and the significant frequency of mutations (~ 22%) suggest that PIK3CA plays an important role in the carcinogenesis of CM/ESCC patients. Moreover, the presence of PIK3CA mutation in a benign lesion further supports the putative role of chagasic megaesophagus as an ESCC-related condition. The frequency of mutations identified in our study is in line with that reported in the literature for ESCC patients, with frequencies varying from 2.2 to 32.8% (Table 6) [9, 17–33]. This variation can be due to several factors, such as type of tissue (frozen vs FFPE), distinct methodologies for mutation screening and distinct ethnic groups of patients. (Table 6).
Table 6

Frequency of PIK3CA mutations identified in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma worldwide

ReferencesYearCountry (Region)Patients of studyPIK3CA mutated (%)Type of sampleTechniques
Mori et al. [24]2008Japan882.2%FTDirect Sequencing
Wang et al. [30]2013China763.9%FTDirect Sequencing
Akagi et al. [17]2009Japan527.7%FFPEDirect Sequencing
Kim et al. [21]2016Korea53410.5%FFPEDirect Sequencing
Phillips et al. [25]2006Australia3511.8%FFPEDirect Sequencing
Zheng et al. [33]2016China7919.7%FTPyrosequencing
Shigaki et al. [27]2013China21921.0%FTPyrosequencing
Liu et al. [23]2017China21022.9%FFPEPyrosequencing
Baba et al. [18]2015Japan44023.0%FFPEPyrosequencing
Yang et al. [31]2017China244.2%FFPENGS
Song et al. [28]2014China1584.5%FTNGS
Lin et al. [22]2014China1397.0%FFPENGS
Gao et al. [19]2014Japan1339.0%FTNGS
Sawada et al. [26]2016Japan14410.4%FTNGS
TCGA et al. [9]2017Western and Eastern9013.0%FTNGS
Yokota et al. [37]2018Japan12613.5%FFPENGS
Zhang et al. [32]2015China9017.0%FTNGS
Wang et al. [29]2015USA7124.0%FFPENGS

NGS – next generation sequencing; FFPE – formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue; FT – fresh frozen tissue

Frequency of PIK3CA mutations identified in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma worldwide NGS – next generation sequencing; FFPE – formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue; FT – fresh frozen tissue The PIK3CA gene is often mutated in several tumors types and most of its mutations occur in hotspot regions, such as E542K and E545A located in the helical domain (exon 9), and H1047R and H1047L in the kinase domain (exon 20) [11]. These mutations lead to the activation of the PIK3 pathway and have a great potential in oncogenic activities [11]. Interestingly, most of these mutations (E545A, H1047R and H1047L) occurred in patients in the CM/ESCC group and only one (E545A) in one patient in the ESCC group. We also identified other previously described important mutations (Table 3), the D549H mutation observed in the CM/ESCC group was reported in vulva and hepatocellular cancer [34]; R524K mutation found in the ESCC group was reported in colorectal cancer [35]; and the R555K mutation was reported in ovary cancer [36]. Interestingly, it is important to note that we identified three mutations in exon 20 that have not yet been reported (A1027D and K1030R in CM/ESCC group; T1053K in CM group). All these mutations occurred in patients with chagasic megaesophagus whose mutational profile of PIK3CA was never reported. Importantly, we observed that CM/ESCC patients harboring PIK3CA mutations were associated with lower overall survival, suggesting its role as a prognostic biomarker in this group of patients. Interestingly, the results of our analyzes of the survival of the mutated patients differ from those reported by others studies, especially in regions of some risk such as Asia, in which patients with ESCC with mutations of the PIK3CA gene had a favorable overall survival compared to patients wild-type [37]. Notably, inhibitors of the PIK3-Akt-mTOR pathway have been developed as cancer target therapy alternatives, and patients harboring PIK3CA gene mutations could be potential candidates for such therapeutic approach [14]. Interestingly, phase I and II clinical trials using pan-PIK3CA agents (PIK3-class I), such as buparlisib (BKM120), an oral agent that affects α, β, γ and δ isoforms of PI3K [38], showed efficacy in several solid tumors, including head and neck cancer [39]. Copanlisib (BAY80–6946), an intravenous agent that affects α and δ isoforms of PI3K, also showed promising results in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [40]; as well as pictilisib (GDC-0941), an oral agent that affects γ and δ isoforms of PI3K, where a good response was reported in breast, colorectal, ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer [41]. Therefore, we can hypothesize that a subset of ESCC and CM/ESCC patients with PIK3CA mutations may benefit from these targeted-therapies and consequently improve their dismal survival. In conclusion, this is the first study that analyzed and identified PIK3CA activating mutations in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas associated with chagasic megaesophagus (CM/ESCC), which were associated with a worse outcome. Moreover, the identification of mutations in benign chagasic megaesophagus suggests their putative role in the etiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and opens new opportunities for the treatment of these neglected patients with targeted-therapies.
  40 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway in human cancer: rationale and promise.

Authors:  Ji Luo; Brendan D Manning; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers.

Authors:  Yardena Samuels; Zhenghe Wang; Alberto Bardelli; Natalie Silliman; Janine Ptak; Steve Szabo; Hai Yan; Adi Gazdar; Steven M Powell; Gregory J Riggins; James K V Willson; Sanford Markowitz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Overexpression of PIK3CA is associated with lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ichiro Akagi; Masao Miyashita; Hiroshi Makino; Tsutomu Nomura; Nobutoshi Hagiwara; Ken Takahashi; Kazumitsu Cho; Takuya Mishima; Osamu Ishibashi; Toshikazu Ushijima; Toshihiro Takizawa; Takashi Tajiri
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  The prevalence of PIK3CA mutations in gastric and colon cancer.

Authors:  Sérgia Velho; Carla Oliveira; Ana Ferreira; António Carlos Ferreira; Gianpaolo Suriano; Simó Schwartz; Alex Duval; Fátima Carneiro; José Carlos Machado; Richard Hamelin; Raquel Seruca
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Identification and characterization of NVP-BKM120, an orally available pan-class I PI3-kinase inhibitor.

Authors:  Sauveur-Michel Maira; Sabina Pecchi; Alan Huang; Matthew Burger; Mark Knapp; Dario Sterker; Christian Schnell; Daniel Guthy; Tobi Nagel; Marion Wiesmann; Saskia Brachmann; Christine Fritsch; Marion Dorsch; Patrick Chène; Kevin Shoemaker; Alain De Pover; Daniel Menezes; Georg Martiny-Baron; Doriano Fabbro; Christopher J Wilson; Robert Schlegel; Francesco Hofmann; Carlos García-Echeverría; William R Sellers; Charles F Voliva
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 6.  Chagas disease.

Authors:  Anis Rassi; Anis Rassi; José Antonio Marin-Neto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Mutation analysis of PIK3CA and PIK3CB in esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Wayne A Phillips; Sarah E Russell; Marianne L Ciavarella; David Y H Choong; Karen G Montgomery; Katherine Smith; Richard B Pearson; Robert J S Thomas; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  DNA sequence profiles of the colorectal cancer critical gene set KRAS-BRAF-PIK3CA-PTEN-TP53 related to age at disease onset.

Authors:  Marianne Berg; Stine A Danielsen; Terje Ahlquist; Marianne A Merok; Trude H Ågesen; Morten H Vatn; Tom Mala; Ole H Sjo; Arne Bakka; Ingvild Moberg; Torunn Fetveit; Øystein Mathisen; Anders Husby; Oddvar Sandvik; Arild Nesbakken; Espen Thiis-Evensen; Ragnhild A Lothe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryota Mori; Hideyuki Ishiguro; Masahiro Kimura; Akira Mitsui; Hidefumi Sasaki; Keisuke Tomoda; Yoichiro Mori; Ryo Ogawa; Takeyasu Katada; Osamu Kawano; Koshiro Harada; Yoshitaka Fujii; Yoshiyuki Kuwabara
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Mutation of the PIK3CA oncogene in human cancers.

Authors:  B Karakas; K E Bachman; B H Park
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Segmental Ipsilateral Odontognathic Dysplasia (Mandibular Involvement in Segmental Odontomaxillary Dysplasia?) and Identification of PIK3CA Somatic Variant in Lesional Mandibular Gingival Tissue.

Authors:  Tanya M Gibson; Keith Rafferty; Elyse Ryan; Arupa Ganguly; Ioannis G Koutlas
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2020-06-04

2.  POLE2 knockdown reduce tumorigenesis in esophageal squamous cells.

Authors:  Yongjun Zhu; Gang Chen; Yang Song; Zhiming Chen; Xiaofeng Chen
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 3.  PIK3CA Gene Mutations in Solid Malignancies: Association with Clinicopathological Parameters and Prognosis.

Authors:  Ali Alqahtani; Hazem S K Ayesh; Hafez Halawani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Profile of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma mutations in Brazilian patients.

Authors:  Fernanda Franco Munari; Wellington Dos Santos; Adriane Feijó Evangelista; Ana Carolina Carvalho; Paula Aguiar Pastrez; Diego Bugatti; Durval R Wohnrath; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto; Denise Peixoto Guimarães; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Integrated cohort of esophageal squamous cell cancer reveals genomic features underlying clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Minghao Li; Zicheng Zhang; Qianrong Wang; Yan Yi; Baosheng Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 6.  The Mechanisms for the Association of Cancer and Esophageal Dysmotility Disorders.

Authors:  Francisco Tustumi; Jorge Henrique Bento de Sousa; Nicolas Medeiros Dornelas; Guilherme Maganha Rosa; Milton Steinman; Edno Tales Bianchi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 7.  Role of PI3K/AKT pathway in cancer: the framework of malignant behavior.

Authors:  Ningni Jiang; Qijie Dai; Xiaorui Su; Jianjiang Fu; Xuancheng Feng; Juan Peng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.