| Literature DB >> 27672108 |
A Patnaik1, L J Appleman2, A W Tolcher3, K P Papadopoulos3, M Beeram3, D W Rasco3, G J Weiss4, J C Sachdev5, M Chadha5, M Fulk5, S Ejadi5, J M Mountz2, M T Lotze2, F G S Toledo2, E Chu2, M Jeffers6, C Peña6, C Xia6, S Reif7, I Genvresse7, R K Ramanathan5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of copanlisib, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I dose-escalation study including patients with advanced solid tumors or NHL, and a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients received three weekly intravenous infusions of copanlisib per 28-day cycle over the dose range 0.1-1.2 mg/kg. Plasma copanlisib levels were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. Biomarker analysis included PIK3CA, KRAS, BRAF, and PTEN mutational status and PTEN immunohistochemistry. Whole-body [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) was carried out at baseline and following the first dose to assess early pharmacodynamic effects. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were evaluated serially.Entities:
Keywords: PI3K inhibitor; advanced cancer; copanlisib; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27672108 PMCID: PMC5035790 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oncol ISSN: 0923-7534 Impact factor: 32.976
Baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics
| Dose escalation ( | Expansion cohorts | Total ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid tumors | NHL | Diabetic | |||
| Median age, years (range) | 62 (35–86) | 61 (33–81) | 72 (40–84) | 67 (46–71) | 65 (33–86) |
| Males, | 7 (41) | 4 (16) | 4 (44) | 5 (83) | 20 (35) |
| ECOG performance status, | |||||
| 0 | 5 (29) | 7 (28) | 2 (22) | 4 (67) | 18 (32) |
| 1 | 11 (65) | 15 (60) | 5 (56) | 2 (33) | 33 (58) |
| 2 | 1 (6) | 3 (12) | 2 (22) | 0 | 6 (11) |
| Any prior systemic therapy, | 16 (94) | 24 (96) | 9 (100) | 6 (100) | 55 (97) |
| Median number of prior systemic therapies (range) | 3 (0–7) | 4 (0–14) | 3 (1–8) | 4 (2–6) | 4 (0–14) |
| Prior therapies, | |||||
| Rituximaba | 1 (6) | 0 | 9 (100) | 0 | 10 (18) |
| Bendamustine | 0 | 0 | 4 (44) | 0 | 4 (7) |
| PI3K/mTOR inhibitor | 0 | 2 (8) | 2 (22) | 0 | 4 (7) |
| Prior radiotherapy, | 9 (53) | 13 (52) | 3 (33) | 2 (33) | 27 (47) |
| Cancer diagnosis, | |||||
| Breast | 0 | 16 (64) | 0 | 0 | 16 (28) |
| NHL | 0 | 0 | 9 (100) | 0 | 9 (16) |
| Uterine | 2 (12) | 3 (12) | 0 | 0 | 5 (9) |
| Gastric/esophageal | 3 (18) | 2 (8) | 0 | 1 (17) | 6 (11) |
| Bladder | 1 (6) | 2 (8) | 0 | 1 (17) | 4 (7) |
| Pancreatic | 3 (18) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (5) |
| Ovarian | 0 | 2 (8) | 0 | 1 (17) | 3 (5) |
| NSCLC | 1 (6) | 0 | 0 | 2 (33) | 3 (5) |
| Melanoma | 1 (6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) |
| Colon | 1 (6) | 0 | 0 | 1 (17) | 2 (4) |
| Other | 5 (29) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (9) |
aOne patient in cohort 4 with a solid tumor had received prior rituximab because of follicular lymphoma diagnosed several years after the solid tumor but also before study entry (second tumor; allowed in study protocol).
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.
Baseline tumor molecular status
| Dose escalation | Solid-tumor expansion | NHL expansion | Diabetic | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 25 | 9 | 6 | 57 | |
| 0 | 7 (28) | 0 | 1 (17) | 8 (14) | |
| 17 (100) | 18 (72) | 9 (100) | 5 (83) | 49 (86) | |
| 5 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 38 | |
| 1 (20) | 8 (36) | 0 | 1 (25) | 10 (26) | |
| 4 (80) | 14 (64) | 7 (100) | 3 (75) | 28 (74) | |
| 17 | 25 | 9 | 6 | 57 | |
| 1 (6) | 10 (40) | 0 | 1 (17) | 12 (21) | |
| 16 (94) | 15 (60) | 9 (100) | 5 (83) | 45 (79) | |
| PTEN expression status by IHC in tumor tissued, | |||||
| 18 | 7 | 3 | 28 | ||
| ND | 9 (50) | 1 (14) | 2 (67) | 12 (43) | |
| ND | 3 (17) | 4 (57) | 0 | 7 (25) | |
| ND | 6 (33) | 2 (29) | 1 (33) | 9 (32) | |
| PI3K activation statusa,b,c, | |||||
| 17 | 25 | 9 | 6 | 57 | |
| 1 (6) | 18 (72) | 5 (56) | 3 (50) | 27 (47) | |
| 16 (94) | 7 (28) | 4 (44) | 3 (50) | 30 (53) | |
| 17 | 22 | 5 | 6 | 50 | |
| 3 (18) | 2 (9) | 0 | 3 (50) | 8 (16) | |
| 14 (82) | 20 (91) | 5 (100) | 3 (50) | 42 (84) | |
| 17 | 22 | 5 | 6 | 50 | |
| 1 (6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) | |
| 16 (94) | 22 (100) | 5 (100) | 6 (100) | 49 (98) | |
aMutational status was assessed by BEAMing (Sysmex Inostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) and/or next-generation sequencing of DNA isolated from tumor tissue, and/or by BEAMing of circulating tumor DNA.
bNext-generation sequencing was not carried out on samples from the dose-escalation cohorts.
cCases with mutations detected by one test but not the other were designated mutant.
dPTEN loss: 0% of tumor cells staining positive for PTEN by IHC; low PTEN: 1% to <5% staining positive; no PTEN loss: ≥5% staining positive.
BEAMing, beads, emulsions, amplification, and magnetics technology; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ND, not determined; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.
Summary of adverse events possibly related to study drug
| Dose-escalation cohorts | Expansion cohorts | Total ( | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | Cohort 3 | Cohort 4 | Cohort 5 | Solid tumors | NHL | Diabetic | |||||||||||
| Any drug-related AEa | 1 (100) | 3 (100) | 2 (67) | 7 (100) | 3 (100) | 20 (80) | 8 (89) | 5 (83) | 49 (86) | |||||||||
| Drug-related AEs of grade 3 or 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Grade 3 | 0 | 2 (67) | 1 (33) | 4 (57) | 2 (67) | 12 (48) | 5 (56) | 3 (50) | 29 (51) | |||||||||
| Grade 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 1 (11) | 0 | 2 (4)b | |||||||||
| Drug-related AEs in ≥10% of patients | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3 | All | Grade 3c |
| Hyperglycemia | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 7 (100) | 4 (57) | 3 (100) | 1 (33) | 15 (60) | 8 (32) | 8 (89) | 3 (33) | 1 (17) | 1 (17) | 36 (63) | 17 (30) |
| Nausea | 0 | 0 | 3 (100) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (14) | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 7 (28) | 0 | 7 (78) | 0 | 2 (33) | 0 | 21 (37) | 0 |
| Hypertension | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) | 1 (33) | 1 (14) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (20) | 2 (8) | 3 (33) | 3 (33) | 2 (33) | 2 (33) | 12 (21) | 8 (14) |
| Diarrhea | 0 | 0 | 2 (67) | 1 (33) | 0 | 0 | 1 (14) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8) | 0 | 3 (33) | 0 | 1 (17) | 0 | 9 (16) | 1 (2) |
| Rash/desquamation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (24) | 2 (8) | 2 (22) | 1 (11) | 1 (17) | 1 (17) | 9 (16) | 4 (7) |
| Vomiting | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (14) | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 3 (12) | 0 | 1 (11) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (12) | 0 |
| Fatigue | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8) | 0 | 3 (33) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (11) | 0 |
| Oral cavity mucositis | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8) | 0 | 3 (33) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (11) | 0 |
aAll AEs were defined according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.
bThe two drug-related AEs of grade 4 as worst grade were hyperglycemia and increased aspartate aminotransferase in one patient in the 1.2 mg/kg cohort (dose-limiting toxicities).
cDrug-related AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurring in <10% of patients treated at the 0.8 mg/kg dose level were: two cases of drug-related grade 3 non-infectious pneumonitis in two patients with NHL; one case of grade 3 hypoxia (reported concomitantly with one of the cases of non-infectious pneumonitis in a patient with NHL); grade 3 decreased white blood cell count with fever ≥38.5°C in one patient with NHL; one case of grade 4 increased amylase in a patient with NHL; grade 3 anemia in one patient with NHL; grade 3 dyspnea and dizziness, both in one solid-tumor patient (infusion reaction); and grade 3 chest pain in one solid-tumor patient.
AE, adverse event; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Copanlisib pharmacokinetic parameters in cycle 1
| Dose-escalation cohorts | Expansion cohorts | MTD | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | Cohort 3 | Cohort 4 | Cohort 5 | Solid tumors | NHL | Diabetic | 0.8 mg/kg combined ( | |
| Day 1 | |||||||||
| | 32.9 | 79.8 (38.0) | 143–144 | 293 (16.5) | 616–739b,c | 537 (82.7) | 402 (58.5) | 138 (36.7) | 454 (73.3) |
| | 0.5 | 1.1 (0.5–1.1) | 0.5–1.1 | 1.1 (0.8–1.2) | 0.6–1.3b,c | 1.0 (0.5–3.0) | 1.0 (0.5–1.0) | 1.0 (1.0–1.2) | 1.0 (0.5–3.0)d |
| AUC(0–25), µg × h/l (%)a | 170 | 384 (29.4) | 348–556 | 1595 (25.6) | 2508–3821b,c | 1689 (46.7) | 1353 (36.8) | 607 (43.6) | 1593 (41.9) |
| AUC(0–tlast), µg × h/l (%)a | 254 | 472 (22.0) | 722–1449 | 2943 (45.9) | 4088–5234b,c | 2918 (47.2) | 2713 (50.3) | 1070 (66.2) | 2876 (46.5) |
| | 48.6 | 48.4 (25.0–49.0) | 167.8–170.2 | 142.5 (25.0–192.0) | 29.3–167.2b,c | 118.5 (46.4–194.2) | 167.0 (47.3–191.9) | 49.0 (48.9–167.4) | 142.5 (25.0–194.2)e |
| | NC | NC | 60.6f | 42.3 (28.6)g | 33.0f | 36.9 (47.8)h | 38.9 (41.3)i | 34.4 (138)b | 38.2 (42.5)j |
| Day 15 | |||||||||
| | 37.6 | 89.4 (26.5) | 70.1–193 | 370 (29.8)k | – | 477 (76.4)l | 507 (52.2)i | 151 (23.4) | 463 (64.4)m |
| | 0.5 | 1.0 (1.0–1.2) | 0.5–1.1 | 1.0 (0.5–1.1)k | – | 1.0 (0.5–1.3)l | 0.8 (0.5–1.0)i | 1.0 (0.5–1.1) | 1.0 (0.5–1.3)m |
| AUC(0–25), µg × h/l (%)a | 175 | 453 (14.4) | 324–803 | 1484 (22.3)k | – | 1525 (39.7)n | 1761 (46.3)i | 687 (36.0) | 1569 (38.4)o |
aGeometric mean (% coefficient of variation) given for n ≥ 3, range given for n = 2, and individual data given for n = 1.
bn = 2.
cErroneous dosing in one of the three patients in the 1.2 mg/kg cohort.
dn = 34.
en = 7.
fn = 1.
gn = 4.
hn = 16.
in = 8.
jn = 28.
kn = 6.
ln = 22.
mn = 36.
nn = 21.
on = 35.
AUC(0–25), area under the curve from time zero to 25 h after start of infusion; AUC(0–tlast), area under the curve from time zero to the last time point above the lower limit of quantification; Cmax, maximum drug concentration; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; NC, not calculated; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; t1/2, half-life associated with the terminal slope; tlast, time zero to the last time point above the lower limit of quantification; tmax, time to maximum drug concentration.
Figure 1.Geometric mean (standard deviation) plasma concentration–time profiles for copanlisib at the maximum tolerated dose expansion dose (0.8 mg/kg) on cycle 1 (at the 96-h time point, samples were collected 72–120 h following the start of infusion), day 1 (A), cycle 1, day 15 (B), and cycle 3, day 15 (C). NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Figure 2.Radiologic response to copanlisib with corresponding status of tumor PIK3CA mutation, PTEN protein loss by immunohistochemistry, and PTEN mutation (A) and metabolic response to copanlisib (percentage change from baseline in SUVmax from 18FDG-PET) with corresponding status of tumor PIK3CA, PTEN, and KRAS alteration (B), in patients with solid tumors, and radiologic response to copanlisib with corresponding status of tumor PIK3CA mutation, PTEN protein loss by immunohistochemistry, and PTEN mutation in patients from the NHL expansion cohort (C), treated with 0.8 mg/kg copanlisib. aLoss defined as 0% of tumor cells staining positive for PTEN by immunohistochemistry; bpositive defined as ≥5% of tumor cells staining positive for PTEN by immunohistochemistry; clow defined as 1% to <5% of tumor cells staining positive for PTEN by immunohistochemistry. 18FDG-PET, [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Bl, bladder cancer; Br, breast cancer; Chol, cholangiocarcinoma; CR, complete response; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; End, endometrial carcinoma; Esoph, esophageal cancer; FL, follicular lymphoma; Gast, gastric cancer; NA, not available; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; Ov, ovarian cancer; Panc, pancreatic cancer; PD, progressive disease; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; Thy, thyroid carcinoma.