Literature DB >> 30618461

Multimorbidity and care for hypertension, diabetes and HIV among older adults in rural South Africa.

Angela Y Chang1, F Xavier Gómez-Olivé2, Jennifer Manne-Goehler3, Alisha N Wade2, Stephen Tollman2, Thomas A Gaziano4, Joshua A Salomon5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how multimorbidity might affect progression along the continuum of care among older adults with hypertension, diabetes and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in rural South Africa.
METHODS: We analysed data from 4447 people aged 40 years or older who were enrolled in a longitudinal study in Agincourt sub-district. Household-based interviews were completed between November 2014 and November 2015. For hypertension and diabetes (2813 and 512 people, respectively), we defined concordant conditions as other cardiometabolic conditions, and discordant conditions as mental disorders or HIV infection. For HIV infection (1027 people) we defined any other conditions as discordant. Regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between the type of multimorbidity and progression along the care continuum and the likelihood of patients being in each stage of care for the index condition (four stages from testing to treatment).
FINDINGS: People with hypertension or diabetes plus other cardiometabolic conditions were more like to progress through the care continuum for the index condition than those without cardiometabolic conditions (relative risk, RR: 1.14, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.09-1.20, and RR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.52-3.26, respectively). Having discordant comorbidity was associated with greater progression in care for those with hypertension but not diabetes. Those with HIV infection plus cardiometabolic conditions had less progress in the stages of care compared with those without such conditions (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.92).
CONCLUSION: Patients with concordant conditions were more likely to progress further along the care continuum, while those with discordant multimorbidity tended not to progress beyond diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30618461      PMCID: PMC6307505          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.18.217000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


Introduction

Increases in ageing populations in low- and middle-income countries has contributed to a rising prevalence of multimorbidity, commonly defined as persons with more than one medical condition. Previous studies have found that multimorbidity is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, higher health expenditure and frequency of service use,– higher use of secondary than primary care,, and higher hospitalization rates among patients.,, One limitation in the existing literature is that studies of multimorbidity often focus on simple counts of medical conditions. However, different combinations of diseases may affect a person’s health and health care differently. To account for these differences, disease combinations can be categorized as either concordant (similar in risk profile and management) or discordant (not directly related in pathogenesis or management). Theoretically, concordant conditions are more likely to be diagnosed and treated along with the index condition, because clinical guidelines often incorporate their interactions. For discordant conditions, however, the competing demands of dealing with different conditions may affect the quality of care provided. Previous studies in high-income settings found that patients with diabetes, or hypertension, had higher odds of achieving testing and control goals when they had concordant conditions than discordant conditions. Diabetes patients with discordant conditions, on the other hand, had higher unplanned use of hospital services and specialized care than those with concordant conditions. Little is known about the care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and multimorbidity, although studies in the United States of America found that patients with HIV received poorer care for their coexisting conditions than did those without HIV.– Much less is known about how the type of multimorbidity (concordant or discordant) affects a person’s progression along the continuum of care in low- and middle-income countries. Our study aimed to fill this gap by studying the progression along the care continuum among people in South Africa with hypertension, diabetes or HIV infection, all prominent conditions contributing to the complex health transition underway in the country. Furthermore, this study assessed the effect of the type of multimorbidity on HIV care (and not on non-HIV comorbidities) among patients infected with HIV.

Methods

Study design

We analysed cross-sectional data from patients enrolled in the Health and Aging in Africa: a Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa. The main study is based the sub-district of Agincourt, in the Bushbuckridge area of Mpumalanga province in South Africa. The study enrolled 5059 participants aged 40 years and older. Household-based interviews were completed between November 2014 and November 2015 using a primary survey instrument to collect data about respondents’ demographic profile, medical conditions and economic status. More details on data collection are described elsewhere. The study received ethical approvals from the University of the Witwatersrand human research ethics committee, the Mpumalanga province research and ethics committee, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health office of human research administration.

Study setting

The Agincourt sub-district has six clinics and two health centres, and there are three district hospitals located 25–60 km from the study site., Primary health-care services are free of charge and most of out-of-pocket health expenditure for patients is incurred for transport, caregiver costs or private health care. The Integrated Chronic Disease Management model was recently introduced in South Africa to address several elements of managing multimorbidity, including standardized clinical care based on national treatment protocols, and promotion of disease monitoring and management among patients.– In Agincourt, a patient with any symptom or disease arriving at a local clinic will be received by a nurse who is expected to address all the patient’s needs. Those who visit the clinic primarily for HIV testing are directed to a nearby building staffed by health workers tasked solely with HIV testing. Patients are referred for the same management as other patients only if they are diagnosed as HIV positive.

Definitions

For this analysis, we studied three index conditions: (i) hypertension; (ii) diabetes; and (iii) HIV infection. We defined an index condition as a reference condition for which the continuum of care was evaluated, not as the time sequence in occurrence or diagnosis of multiple conditions. For example, for an individual with hypertension plus other conditions, we assigned hypertension as the index condition and evaluated progression along the continuum of care for hypertension in relation to the presence of different types of either concordant or discordant multimorbidity. In addition to the three index conditions, we selected five others as concordant or discordant conditions: (i) dyslipidaemia; (ii) angina; (iii) depression; (iv) post-traumatic stress disorder; and (v) alcohol dependence. We ascertained the presence of the medical conditions based on the clinical diagnosis or clear clinical criteria (Box 1). We selected the medical conditions according to the data that were available in the main study, described in detail elsewhere.

Index conditions

Hypertension was defined as either mean systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and mean diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or patients’ self-report of receiving current treatment. Diabetes was defined as fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (defined as patients whose last meal was > 8 hours before specimen collection), non-fasting blood glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL or self-reported current treatment. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status was ascertained either from collected dried blood spots that showed HIV infection or exposure to antiretroviral therapy or self-reported disease status.

Concordant and discordant conditions

Dyslipidaemia was one of the following criteria: self-reported disease status; elevated total cholesterol (≥ 6.21 mmol/L); low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.19 mmol/L); elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (> 4.10 mmol/L); elevated triglycerides (> 2.25 mmol/L). Angina was diagnosed using the Rose chest pain questionnaire. Depression was defined as three or more symptoms of depression on the Center for Epidemiological Studies depression scale 8-item questionnaire. Post-traumatic stress disorder was diagnosed as four or more symptoms on a seven-symptom screening scale. Alcohol dependence was defined using the CAGE questionnaire. We determined concordance and discordance based on the risk factors and multimorbidities for diagnosis and treatment in the South African national guidelines for hypertension and diabetes.– We found no definition of concordant diseases beyond opportunistic infections in the national HIV guidelines. For people with hypertension, we categorized other cardiometabolic conditions (dyslipidaemia, diabetes and angina) as concordant conditions, and mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence) and HIV infection as discordant. Similarly, for people with diabetes, we classified other cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, dyslipidaemia and angina) as concordant conditions, and mental disorders and HIV infection as discordant. For people with HIV, we considered any of the other conditions as discordant. We defined the continuum of care for each index condition by four sequential stages of care for a patient: being tested for the disease (stage 1), knowing his or her diagnosis (stage 2), ever being initiated on treatment (stage 3) and currently being retained on treatment (stage 4). For hypertension and diabetes, the stage reached was determined from a patient’s self-reporting. For HIV, we relied on both self-reported status and blood test results to determine progression. Patients with dried blood-spot results that showed exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART) were considered to have reached the treatment stage and all preceding stages, even if they self-reported otherwise.

Statistical analyses

We first conducted descriptive analyses of the prevalence of the three index conditions as well as the prevalence of concordant and discordant conditions by key sociodemographic covariates. Next, we constructed a count variable for each index condition to signify how many stages each respondent with that index condition had advanced along the corresponding continuum of care for that index condition, with a minimum count of zero and maximum of four. We fitted quasi-Poisson regression models to analyse the relationship between the number of stages respondents reached in the continuum of care and the type of multimorbidity. We used a series of logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for associations between either concordant or discordant multimorbidities and the odds of advancing to each stage of the care continuum, conditional on having reached the previous stage. In the case of diagnosis, the logistic regression modelled the unconditional odds. We adjusted all regression models for sociodemographic covariates, including age, sex, education, country of origin, marital status, household size, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living and wealth (measured in quintiles based on household asset ownership) and synthesized these using standard methods. All analyses were conducted in R software version 3.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Complete data on disease prevalence and continuum of care were available for 4447 respondents (88% of the whole sample of 5059). We excluded 135 people due to missing data about disease status of at least one disease category and 477 people due to missing dried blood-spot samples. Table 1 shows the prevalence of hypertension (63%, 2813 people), diabetes (12%, 512 people) and HIV (23%, 1027 people) as well as the prevalence of concordant and discordant conditions by sociodemographic covariates. Among patients with hypertension, 1535 (55%) had one or more additional cardiometabolic condition, 615 (22%) had one or more mental disorder and 480 (17%) were HIV positive. Among those with diabetes, 465 (91%) patients had other cardiometabolic conditions, 139 (27%) had mental disorders and 77 (15%) were HIV positive. Among patients with HIV infection, 728 (71%) presented with cardiometabolic conditions and 181 (18%) with mental disorders. Reflecting the wider population profile, people with HIV tended to be younger, poorer, in employment and separated from partners compared with those with hypertension and diabetes.
Table 1

Prevalence of concordant and discordant multimorbidity and sociodemographic profile of patients with hypertension, diabetes and HIV infection in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

VariableIndex condition, no. (%) of people
HypertensionDiabetesHIV infection
Total2813 (100)512 (100)1027 (100)
Other conditions
Cardiometabolic conditionsa (excluding index condition)1535 (55)465 (91)728 (71)
Mental disordersb615 (22)139 (27)181 (18)
HIV infection480 (17)77 (15)NA
Age group, years  
40–49353 (13)45 (9)306 (30)
50–59757 (27)125 (24)382 (37)
60–69801 (28)165 (32)237 (23)
70–79554 (20)116 (23)89 (9)
80+348 (12)61 (12)13 (1)
Sex
Male1194 (42)214 (42)472 (46)
Female1619 (58)298 (58)555 (54)
Education
No formal education1333 (47)217 (42)419 (41)
Some primary education (1–7 years)987 (35)208 (41)360 (35)
Some secondary education (8–11 years)294 (10)46 (9)160 (16)
Completed secondary (12+ years)199 (7)41 (8)88 (9)
Country of origin
South Africa1998 (71)408 (80)672 (65)
Mozambique or other815 (29)104 (20)355 (35)
Marital status
Never married96 (3)19 (4)75 (7)
Currently married or living with partner1457 (52)269 (53)409 (40)
Separated or divorced350 (12)54 (11)207 (20)
Widowed910 (32)170 (33)336 (33)
Household size
Living alone281 (10)49 (10)152 (15)
Living with 1 other person297 (11)57 (11)107 (10)
Living in 3–6 people household1348 (48)245 (48)481 (47)
Living in 7+ people household887 (32)161 (31)287 (28)
Employment status
Employed part- or full-time397 (14)61 (12)220 (21)
Other2416 (86)451 (88)807 (79)
Has limitations in activities of daily living
No2558 (91)444 (87)964 (94)
Yes255 (9)68 (13)63 (6)
Wealth index
Quintile 1 (poorest)527 (19)62 (12)253 (25)
Quintile 2545 (19)84 (16)206 (20)
Quintile 3542 (19)105 (21)213 (21)
Quintile 4600 (21)121 (24)195 (19)
Quintile 5 (richest)599 (21)140 (27)160 (16)

CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; NA not applicable.

a Dyslipidaemia, angina, hypertension, diabetes.

b Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence.

Notes: These data are based on a total of 4447 people who were tested for the index conditions during the household interview. Inconsistencies arise in some values due to rounding.

CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; NA not applicable. a Dyslipidaemia, angina, hypertension, diabetes. b Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence. Notes: These data are based on a total of 4447 people who were tested for the index conditions during the household interview. Inconsistencies arise in some values due to rounding.

Continuum of care

Table 2 shows the number of patients reaching each stage of care for each index condition by sociodemographic covariates. The mean number of stages reached in the care continuum (maximum 4) were 2.44 (standard deviation, SD: 1.50) for hypertension, 2.29 (SD: 1.67) for diabetes and 2.99 (SD: 1.54) for HIV infection. People with hypertension or diabetes plus other cardiometabolic (i.e. concordant) conditions were more likely to proceed further along the care continuum for the index condition than those without cardiometabolic conditions (relative risk, RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09–1.20 and RR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.52–3.26 respectively; Table 3; Fig. 1). Patients with hypertension and discordant conditions were also more likely to progress further in hypertension care (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04–1.16 for mental disorders and RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01–1.15 for HIV infection), but those with diabetes were not. Other covariates that were associated with the progression of care among people with hypertension included being older or female, having limitations in activities of daily living, higher education level, of South African origin and wealthier. For those with HIV infection, having cardiometabolic (i.e. discordant) conditions were associated with less advanced progression in HIV care compared with people without cardiometabolic conditions (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80–0.92). Other covariates that were associated with the further progression of care included being older, male and living in larger households.
Table 2

Progression through stages in the care continuum, by multimorbidity status and key sociodemographic covariates, among patients with hypertension, diabetes and HIV infection in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

VariableIndex condition by stage of care reached, no. of patients
Hypertension
Diabetes
HIV infection
Tested (all patients)a
Tested (among those with condition)bKnow statusbEver treatedbCurrently treatedbTested (all patients)aTested (among those with condition)bKnow statusbEver treatedbCurrently treatedbTested (all patients)aTested (among those with condition)bKnow statusbEver treatedbCurrently treatedb
Total observations44472813208419151508444751238330025244471027913730703
Reached stage3116208419151508111521383833002522242993913730703699
Other conditions
Cardiometabolic conditions (excluding index condition)16001252112290668317823692882452192361648520495491
Mental disorders694503493403301470112836864595163134130129
HIV infection71736032623917647352433730913913730703699
Age group, years
40–49 5062291831077133727191515613262205191189
50–5984754647134824757493756862946355285276275
60–69831615576464356590119957472793216170167166
70–795824304293632714039675634943769626262
80+3502642562261702344836322620411877
Sex
Male136180468251237812132251701441311651486387367364
Female175512801233996737925158130108931342427343336335
Education
No formal education14541002940780578930165128105901193365288279277
Some primary (1–7 years of education)1097744695537396785152114100931127327267260258
Some secondary (8–11 years of education)3492111671209125432272220395142111108108
Secondary or more (12+ years of education)21612711371501693431252127879645656
Country of origin
South Africa217414911404111283315483052412031842125601489469467
Mozambique or other94259351139628259078594940868312241234232
Marital status
Never married152615538288011118715964484545
Currently married or living with partner1591106994972353111202001561321181600363293281281
Separated or divorced38824521417312427641302420405191150146145
Widowed9857096975744326621311038879829295239231228
Household size
Living alone31618717414210619937292319295133999797
Living with another person3452342121691202294737282733197787372
Living with 3–6 persons148697790870852510401801361201071455437355343340
Living with 7+ persons969686621489364670119988171912246198190190
Employment status
Employed part- or full-time4672652101389733944362823554193149142142
Other2649181917051370101817993392642242012439720581561557
Has limitations in activities of daily living
No277918581698130496819043252492121892753849681656652
Yes3372262172041472345851403524064494747
Wealth quintile
Quintile 1 (poorest)61337432425117538245352826567214171163161
Quintile 261340335428420339058454137578190146142141
Quintile 363741438028721742575564744588186144140140
Quintile 461043540432925245095715948610174149142141
Quintile 5 (richest)
643458453357268491110937769650149121116116

a This column shows the number of people among the entire sample were tested for the disease by a provider (regardless of whether they had the index condition).

b This column shows the numbers of people with the index condition who reached this care stage.

Table 3

Relative risk for progression through stages in the care continuum, by covariates, among patients with hypertension, diabetes and HIV infection in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

VariableIndex condition
HypertensionDiabetesHIV infection
Total no. of people28135121027
Mean no. (SD) of stages reached in the care continuuma2.44 (1.50)2.29 (1.67)2.99 (1.54)
RR (95% CI) for progression in care
Other conditions
    Cardiometabolic conditionsb (excluding index condition)1.14 (1.09–1.20)d2.18 (1.52–3.26)d0.86 (0.80–0.92)e
    Mental disordersc1.10 (1.04–1.16)e1.02 (0.88–1.19)e0.99 (0.91–1.08)e
    HIV infection1.08 (1.01–1.15)e1.08 (0.89–1.31)eNA
Age group, years
    40–49Ref.Ref.Ref.
    50–591.17 (1.07–1.29)1.26 (0.94–1.71)1.10 (1.01–1.21)
    60–691.30 (1.18–1.43)1.23 (0.91–1.68)1.07 (0.96–1.19)
    70–791.42 (1.28–1.57)1.27 (0.92–1.77)1.04 (0.90–1.20)
    80+1.36 (1.21–1.52)1.21 (0.84–1.75)1.00 (0.72–1.37)
Sex
    MaleRef.Ref.Ref.
    Female1.24 (1.17–1.31)0.99 (0.85–1.16)0.92 (0.85–0.99)
Education
    No formal educationRef.Ref.Ref.
    Some primary (1–7 years of education)0.98 (0.93–1.04)1.00 (0.85–1.18)1.06 (0.97–1.16)
    Some secondary (8–11 years of education)0.90 (0.82–0.99)1.11 (0.84–1.46)1.04 (0.92–1.17)
    Secondary or more (12+ years of education)0.86 (0.76–0.97)1.19 (0.88–1.58)1.01 (0.87–1.18)
Country of origin
    South AfricaRef.Ref.Ref.
    Mozambique or other0.92 (0.87–0.98)0.95 (0.79–1.14)0.98 (0.91–1.07)
Marital status
    Never married0.96 (0.83–1.11)0.95 (0.62–1.40)0.94 (0.81–1.08)
    Currently married or living with partnerRef.Ref.Ref.
    Separated or divorced0.93 (0.86–1.01)0.93 (0.72–1.19)1.06 (0.97–1.17)
    Widowed0.95 (0.90–1.01)1.02 (0.86–1.22)1.05 (0.96–1.14)
Household size
    Living aloneRef.Ref.Ref.
    Living with another person1.06 (0.96–1.18)1.02 (0.76–1.37)1.09 (0.95–1.25)
    Living with 3–6 people1.02 (0.93–1.11)0.99 (0.77–1.28)1.17 (1.05–1.30)
    Living with 7+ people1.03 (0.94–1.13)1.01 (0.78–1.33)1.06 (0.95–1.20)
Employment status
    Employed part- or full-time0.95 (0.88–1.03)0.98 (0.77–1.23)0.98 (0.90–1.07)
    OtherRef.Ref.Ref.
Has limitations in activities of daily living
    NoRef.Ref.Ref.
    Yes1.12 (1.04–1.21)1.23 (1.01–1.48)1.11 (0.97–1.26)
Wealth quintile
    Quintile 1 (poorest)Ref.Ref.Ref.
    Quintile 21.04 (0.96–1.12)0.95 (0.74–1.24)1.05 (0.95–1.16)
    Quintile 31.08 (1.00–1.17)0.96 (0.75–1.23)1.01 (0.91–1.12)
    Quintile 41.09 (1.01–1.18)0.97 (0.77–1.25)1.05 (0.94–1.17)
    Quintile 5 (richest)1.21 (1.11–1.31)1.02 (0.80–1.32)1.07 (0.95–1.21)
Constant1.46 (1.26–1.69)0.85 (0.48–1.48)2.78 (2.35–3.28)

CI: confidence interval; NA: not applicable; Ref.: reference group; RR: relative risk; SD: standard deviation.

a Minimum = 0, maximum = 4. Stage 1: tested; 2: know status; 3 ever treated; 4: currently treated.

b Dyslipidaemia, angina, hypertension, diabetes.

c Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence.

d Concordant.

e Discordant.

Note: Dependent variable was progression in the care continuum (number of stages reached by each patient).

Fig. 1

Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the care continuum for patients in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

a This column shows the number of people among the entire sample were tested for the disease by a provider (regardless of whether they had the index condition). b This column shows the numbers of people with the index condition who reached this care stage. CI: confidence interval; NA: not applicable; Ref.: reference group; RR: relative risk; SD: standard deviation. a Minimum = 0, maximum = 4. Stage 1: tested; 2: know status; 3 ever treated; 4: currently treated. b Dyslipidaemia, angina, hypertension, diabetes. c Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence. d Concordant. e Discordant. Note: Dependent variable was progression in the care continuum (number of stages reached by each patient). Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the care continuum for patients in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015 CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; RR: relative risk. Notes: Coefficients from the Poisson regression models are expressed as RRs of progression in the care continuum. Covariates included in the model: age group, sex, education, country of origin, household size, marital status, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living and wealth quintile. Progression in the care continuum is expressed as number of stages reached, minimum = 0, maximum = 4. Stage 1: tested; 2: know status; 3 ever treated; 4: currently treated.

Stages of care reached

Hypertension

Looking more closely at each stage of the continuum, having discordant medical conditions was associated with a higher likelihood of being tested for hypertension. This was true both among the entire sample (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.11–1.57 for patients with mental disorders; OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.02–1.42 for those with HIV infection) and those with hypertension (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.15–1.82 with mental disorders; OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.01–1.65 with HIV infection; Table 4; Fig. 2). Having mental disorders was also associated with a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with hypertension (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.17–1.99), but was not associated with any of the remaining stages in the care continuum. Having HIV infection was not associated with progress in any stages of care among people with hypertension. In comparison, patients with one or more cardiometabolic (concordant) conditions were more likely to be diagnosed with hypertension (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.24–1.88), ever-treated (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.21–1.92) and currently on treatment (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.08–1.97) for hypertension.
Table 4

Odds of progression through stages in the care continuum for patients with hypertension, diabetes and HIV infection and concordant or discordant multimorbidity in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

Index conditionStage of care reached
Tested (all patients)Tested (among those with condition)Know status (among those tested)Ever treated (among those who know status)Currently treated (among those ever treated)
Hypertension
No. of observations44472813208419151508
aOR (95% CI) of associations with:
    Cardiometabolic conditionsa1.13 (0.99–1.29)1.17 (0.98–1.39)1.53 (1.24–1.88)1.52 (1.21–1.92)1.46 (1.08–1.97)
    Mental disordersb1.32 (1.11–1.57)1.44 (1.15–1.82)1.52 (1.17–1.99)1.22 (0.91–1.64)1.04 (0.74–1.50)
    HIV infectionb1.20 (1.02–1.42)1.29 (1.01–1.65)1.31 (0.99–1.74)0.85 (0.63–1.14)1.26 (0.83–1.95)
Diabetes
No. of observations4447512383300252
aOR (95% CI) of associations with:
    Cardiometabolic conditionsa1.75 (1.51–2.04)4.20 (2.19–8.19)3.55 (1.34–9.64)3.03 (0.67–12.21)2.88 (0.27–22.57)
    Mental disordersb1.13 (0.97–1.31)1.36 (0.82–2.31)0.76 (0.44–1.33)0.72 (0.35–1.55)1.68 (0.57–5.50)
    HIV infectionb1.10 (0.94–1.28)1.07 (0.60–1.98)1.29 (0.62–2.87)0.81 (0.32–2.18)0.43 (0.14–1.40)
HIV infection
No. of observations44471027913730703
aOR (95% CI) of associations with:
    Cardiometabolic conditionsb1.06 (0.90–1.25)1.03 (0.66–1.58)0.46 (0.30–0.69)0.32 (0.09–0.87)0.00 (NA)
    Mental disordersb0.99 (0.85–1.17)1.03 (0.61–1.83)0.98 (0.64–1.53)1.20 (0.41–4.44)0.57 (0.06–12.26)

aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; NA: not applicable.

a Concordant conditions.

b Discordant conditions.

Notes: For hypertension, concordant conditions were other cardiometabolic conditions (dyslipidaemia, diabetes, angina); discordant conditions were mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence) and HIV infection. For diabetes, concordant conditions were other cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, angina); discordant conditions were mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence) and HIV infection. For HIV infection, there were no concordant conditions; discordant conditions were cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and angina) and mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence). Covariates included in the model: age group, sex, education, country of origin, household size, marital status, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living, and wealth quintile.

Fig. 2

Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the continuum of hypertension care for patients with hypertension in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; NA: not applicable. a Concordant conditions. b Discordant conditions. Notes: For hypertension, concordant conditions were other cardiometabolic conditions (dyslipidaemia, diabetes, angina); discordant conditions were mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence) and HIV infection. For diabetes, concordant conditions were other cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, angina); discordant conditions were mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence) and HIV infection. For HIV infection, there were no concordant conditions; discordant conditions were cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and angina) and mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence). Covariates included in the model: age group, sex, education, country of origin, household size, marital status, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living, and wealth quintile. Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the continuum of hypertension care for patients with hypertension in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015 HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; OR: odds ratio. Notes: Coefficients from the logistic regression models are expressed as ORs. Covariates included in the model: age group, sex, education, country of origin, household size, marital status, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living and wealth quintile.

Diabetes

The effects of the types of multimorbidity on people with diabetes were greater. Having cardiometabolic (concordant) conditions was associated with higher odds of being tested for diabetes both among the whole sample (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.51–2.04) and those with diabetes (OR: 4.20; 95% CI: 2.19–8.19; Table 4; Fig. 3). Among patients with diabetes, having cardiometabolic conditions was associated with higher odds of knowing their diabetes status (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.34–9.64), but not of being initiated or retained on treatment. Having discordant conditions (mental disorder or HIV infection) was not associated with progression to each stage.
Fig. 3

Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the continuum of diabetes care for patients with diabetes in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the continuum of diabetes care for patients with diabetes in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015 HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; OR: odds ratio. Notes: Coefficients from the logistic regression models are expressed as ORs. Covariates included in the model: age group, sex, education, country of origin, household size, marital status, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living and wealth quintile.

HIV infection

In contrast with hypertension and diabetes, having HIV and cardiometabolic (discordant) conditions was associated with worse care for HIV patients. The odds were 54% lower for knowing their HIV status (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30–0.69) and 68% lower for ever receiving ART (OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.09–0.87; Table 4; Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the continuum of HIV care for patients with HIV infection in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015

Association between concordant and discordant multimorbidity and progression in the continuum of HIV care for patients with HIV infection in Agincourt sub-district, South Africa, November 2014 to November 2015 HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; OR: odds ratio. Notes: Coefficients from the logistic regression models are expressed ORs. Covariates included in the model: age group, sex, education, country of origin, household size, marital status, employment status, having limitations in activities of daily living and wealth quintile. Data for the adjusted odds ratios for each covariate by stage of care reached are available from the corresponding author.

Discussion

In line with theories and empirical findings from high-income settings,– we found that having concordant conditions was associated with a higher likelihood of progressing further along the continuum of care for hypertension and diabetes in our study population. This may be explained by the emphasis that the South African hypertension guidelines place on diabetes and dyslipidaemia as important comorbidities, and the emphasis on hypertension and dyslipidaemia in the diabetes guidelines., These guidelines do not give much emphasis to HIV, although both mention it, and neither mention mental disorders. Moreover, providers may be more inclined to treat concordant conditions urgently to reach the target treatment outcomes for the index condition. For example, treating dyslipidaemia in patients may lead to targeting blood pressure control, because of the benefits of preventing the progression of coronary artery diseases. On the other hand, having discordant conditions was not associated with worse care progression for hypertension and diabetes, contrary to experience in high-income settings., Although some studies have shown that mental disorders are associated with poorer progression in care for cardiometabolic conditions, we did not find a significant effect. Negative findings were observed only among people with HIV, where the presence of cardiometabolic (discordant) conditions was associated with less progress in HIV care. This is a concerning finding given that both HIV infection and the use of ART have been associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction., Previous studies found lower quality of care for non-HIV conditions among HIV patients.– Factors that may have contributed to those findings include the lack of specific guidelines for HIV patients for treating diseases other than opportunistic infections; prioritization of short-term health needs; and the difficulty of balancing the demands of caring for complex patients with other medical and psychosocial problems. Comparing across each stage in the continuum of care, both hypertension and diabetes patients with concordant or discordant conditions had a higher likelihood of reaching the first stages of care. This may be due to the lower opportunity costs involved for health-care providers and patients in relation to testing and diagnosis, versus those related to initiation and adherence to treatment. Testing and diagnosing hypertension involve simple procedures with relatively little effort required by providers, and thus the presence of any type of multimorbidity may increase the chance that the patient will be tested. However, the positive effect of discordant diseases may recede as the opportunity cost increases, as is the case for being initiated on and supported to adhere to treatment. More effort is required on the part of the practitioner to determine the right regimen, initiate the treatment, provide counselling on adherence and follow-up regularly to ensure the desired outcomes are met. Patients who have non-diabetes cardiometabolic conditions may be tested for diabetes, given the overlap in the risk factors, pathophysiological pathways and treatment guidelines. We did not see this positive effect of multimorbidity among people who were HIV-infected, perhaps due to stigma, practitioners’ lower awareness of HIV among older people and the fact HIV testing requires more complex laboratory-based assessment than measuring blood pressure. Furthermore, we suggest that the negative association between HIV care and having cardiometabolic diseases may relate in part to how the clinics in Agincourt are organized. The separate procedure for HIV testing may explain why people with only HIV and no other conditions were more likely to be diagnosed with HIV conditional on being tested since they likely entered the clinic solely for receiving HIV care. The findings also imply that the objective of the South Africa’s Integrated Chronic Disease Management model may not yet be realized. While not examined empirically in our study, barriers such as long waiting times, staff shortages and drug stock-outs may have negatively impacted the implementation of the management model and resulted in fewer visits made by the patients and shorter consultation times with providers. The nurses may not be trained to diagnose or manage all diseases, and, given time constraints, they are often only able to address the patient's chief complaint and, in some cases, the concordant diseases that are listed in the guidelines. For nationwide implementation of the integrated chronic disease management model, our findings suggest the need for improvements in leveraging one programme (such as the HIV programme) for scaling-up services for another condition (such as noncommunicable disease services), for example by putting more effort into ensuring patient engagement in stages with higher opportunity costs. There may be potential for benefits through the introduction of programmes, such as the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health’s campaign and the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.– Implementing such joint programmes would make cardiometabolic disease management available alongside HIV services to bring populations with different types of multimorbidity into care. Our study is subject to several limitations. First, we assessed whether the presence of a concordant or discordant condition was associated with progression in the care continuum, not whether being in care for one disease leads to being in care for another. Due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, we could not determine the time sequencing of the conditions or the care progression. We were also unable to assess causality on which type of multimorbidity affects care progression. Second, while the prevalence of the three index conditions and the concordant and discordant conditions were based on clinical criteria, data on the stages to which people progressed were self-reported, and our results therefore may have over- or underestimated coverage of different services. As the excluded samples were most commonly due to missing HIV measurements (due to patients’ refusal to be tested), it is likely that we have underestimated the prevalence of HIV infection. The HIV prevalence within the sample is similar to the prevalence level found earlier in Agincourt. Third, all conditions within the cardiometabolic and mental conditions were weighted equally, whereas it is plausible that specific combinations of diseases are associated with higher likelihood of progressing further along the care continuum. Finally, the study’s comparability with existing studies and generalizability to settings with low HIV prevalence may be limited. We conclude that the presence of any type of multimorbidity is associated with a higher likelihood of being in stages of care with lower opportunity costs, while the presence of concordant conditions is associated with higher likelihood of being in stages with higher opportunity costs. Our findings from a relatively typical setting in rural South Africa have policy implications for enhancing access to testing and treatment services to improve service coverage and population health in the country. While we could not corroborate causality, further research, informed by forthcoming waves of the main study, will improve our understanding of the impact of different types of multimorbidity on health outcomes and the use of health services.
  35 in total

1.  Single index of multimorbidity did not predict multiple outcomes.

Authors:  Julie E Byles; Catherine D'Este; Lynne Parkinson; Rachel O'Connell; Carla Treloar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care.

Authors:  John D Piette; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Short screening scale for DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  N Breslau; E L Peterson; R C Kessler; L R Schultz
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Impact of comorbidity type on measures of quality for diabetes care.

Authors:  Lechauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Cassie R Landrum; Degang Wang; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Increased risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients in France, relative to the general population.

Authors:  Sylvie Lang; Murielle Mary-Krause; Laurent Cotte; Jacques Gilquin; Marialuisa Partisani; Anne Simon; Franck Boccara; Annie Bingham; Dominique Costagliola
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Coronary heart disease in HIV-infected individuals.

Authors:  Judith S Currier; Anne Taylor; Felicity Boyd; Christopher M Dezii; Hugh Kawabata; Beth Burtcel; Jen-Fue Maa; Sally Hodder
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Effect of unrelated comorbid conditions on hypertension management.

Authors:  Barbara J Turner; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Mark Weiner; Thomas Ten Have; Simon S K Tang
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Profile: Agincourt health and socio-demographic surveillance system.

Authors:  Kathleen Kahn; Mark A Collinson; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Obed Mokoena; Rhian Twine; Paul Mee; Sulaimon A Afolabi; Benjamin D Clark; Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula; Audrey Khosa; Simon Khoza; Mildred G Shabangu; Bernard Silaule; Jeffrey B Tibane; Ryan G Wagner; Michel L Garenne; Samuel J Clark; Stephen M Tollman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Does diabetes care differ by type of chronic comorbidity?: An evaluation of the Piette and Kerr framework.

Authors:  Sri Ram Pentakota; Mangala Rajan; B Graeme Fincke; Chin-Lin Tseng; Donald R Miller; Cindy L Christiansen; Eve A Kerr; Leonard M Pogach
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Leveraging rapid community-based HIV testing campaigns for non-communicable diseases in rural Uganda.

Authors:  Gabriel Chamie; Dalsone Kwarisiima; Tamara D Clark; Jane Kabami; Vivek Jain; Elvin Geng; Maya L Petersen; Harsha Thirumurthy; Moses R Kamya; Diane V Havlir; Edwin D Charlebois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Response to the Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic Across Africa: Successes, Challenges, and Implications for the Future.

Authors:  Olayinka O Ogunleye; Debashis Basu; Debjani Mueller; Jacqueline Sneddon; R Andrew Seaton; Adesola F Yinka-Ogunleye; Joshua Wamboga; Nenad Miljković; Julius C Mwita; Godfrey Mutashambara Rwegerera; Amos Massele; Okwen Patrick; Loveline Lum Niba; Melaine Nsaikila; Wafaa M Rashed; Mohamed Ali Hussein; Rehab Hegazy; Adefolarin A Amu; Baffour Boaten Boahen-Boaten; Zinhle Matsebula; Prudence Gwebu; Bongani Chirigo; Nongabisa Mkhabela; Tenelisiwe Dlamini; Siphiwe Sithole; Sandile Malaza; Sikhumbuzo Dlamini; Daniel Afriyie; George Awuku Asare; Seth Kwabena Amponsah; Israel Sefah; Margaret Oluka; Anastasia N Guantai; Sylvia A Opanga; Tebello Violet Sarele; Refeletse Keabetsoe Mafisa; Ibrahim Chikowe; Felix Khuluza; Dan Kibuule; Francis Kalemeera; Mwangana Mubita; Joseph Fadare; Laurien Sibomana; Gwendoline Malegwale Ramokgopa; Carmen Whyte; Tshegofatso Maimela; Johannes Hugo; Johanna C Meyer; Natalie Schellack; Enos M Rampamba; Adel Visser; Abubakr Alfadl; Elfatih M Malik; Oliver Ombeva Malande; Aubrey C Kalungia; Chiluba Mwila; Trust Zaranyika; Blessmore Vimbai Chaibva; Ioana D Olaru; Nyasha Masuka; Janney Wale; Lenias Hwenda; Regina Kamoga; Ruaraidh Hill; Corrado Barbui; Tomasz Bochenek; Amanj Kurdi; Stephen Campbell; Antony P Martin; Thuy Nguyen Thi Phuong; Binh Nguyen Thanh; Brian Godman
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Gendered differences in perceptions and reports of wellbeing: A cross-sectional survey of adults on ART in Malawi.

Authors:  Corrina Moucheraud; Jenna Paul-Schultz; Misheck Mphande; Ben Allan Banda; Hitler Sigauke; Verwoed Kumwenda; Kathryn Dovel; Agnes Moses; Sundeep Gupta; Risa M Hoffman
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2021-12-18

3.  A systematic review of engagement in care and health care utilization among older adults living with HIV and non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Moka Yoo-Jeong; Ashley Anderson; Brittany Ray Gannon; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2021-07-12

4.  From "Secret" to "Sensitive Issue": Shifting Ideas About HIV Disclosure Among Middle-Aged and Older Rural South Africans in the Era of Antiretroviral Treatment.

Authors:  Enid Schatz; Ifeolu David; Nicole Angotti; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Sanyu A Mojola
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2021-05-23

5.  Strengthening integration of chronic care in Africa: protocol for the qualitative process evaluation of integrated HIV, diabetes and hypertension care in a cluster randomised controlled trial in Tanzania and Uganda.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Van Hout; Max Bachmann; Jeffrey V Lazarus; Elizabeth Henry Shayo; Dominic Bukenya; Camila A Picchio; Moffat Nyirenda; Sayoki Godfrey Mfinanga; Josephine Birungi; Joseph Okebe; Shabbar Jaffar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A Multi-Dimensional Characterization of Aging and Wellbeing Among HIV-Positive Adults in Malawi.

Authors:  Corrina Moucheraud; Jenna Paul-Schultz; Misheck Mphande; Ben Allan Banda; Hitler Sigauke; Verwoed Kumwenda; Kathryn Dovel; Risa M Hoffman
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-02

7.  Epidemiology of multimorbidity in conditions of extreme poverty: a population-based study of older adults in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Maria Lisa Odland; Collin Payne; Miles D Witham; Mark J Siedner; Till Bärnighausen; Mamadou Bountogo; Boubacar Coulibaly; Pascal Geldsetzer; Guy Harling; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Lucienne Ouermi; Ali Sie; Justine I Davies
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-03-29

8.  Comorbidity of HIV, hypertension, and diabetes and associated factors among people receiving antiretroviral therapy in Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zenebework Getahun; Muluken Azage; Taye Abuhay; Fantu Abebe
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2020-03-15

9.  The patterns of Non-communicable disease Multimorbidity in Iran: A Multilevel Analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Khorrami; Maysam Rezapour; Koorosh Etemad; Shahin Yarahmadi; Soheila Khodakarim; Alireza Mahdavi Hezaveh; Mohammadesmail Kameli; Narges Khanjani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Multimorbidity of chronic non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Authors:  Fantu Abebe; Marguerite Schneider; Biksegn Asrat; Fentie Ambaw
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2020-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.