| Literature DB >> 30617547 |
Chikashi Takeda1,2, Masato Takeuchi1, Toshiyuki Mizota2, Hiroshi Yonekura1, Isao Nahara1, Aki Kuwauchi1, Woo Jin Joo1, Yohei Kawasaki1,3, Koji Kawakami4.
Abstract
Arterial pulse waveform analysis (APWA) is used for cardiac output monitoring. However, data on the frequency of and patient characteristics for specialized pressure transducer for APWA (S-APWA) use are lacking. We retrospectively identified 175,201 patients aged 18 years or older, who underwent non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia with an arterial catheter from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. We extracted data on patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical and anesthesia characteristics, and hospital characteristics. Among the full study cohort, 24,605 (14.0%) patients were monitored using S-APWA. Further, the use of S-APWA was higher in patients undergoing high-risk surgery than in those undergoing low-risk surgery [high vs low: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-2.15, moderate vs low: aOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01-1.22] and those with more comorbidities than in those with less comorbidities (high vs low: aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.42-1.56, moderate vs low: aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.20-1.31). S-APWA use was significantly associated with both surgery risk and patients' comorbidities. In conclusion, our study may provide a benchmark for future studies related to the appropriate use of S-APWA.Entities:
Keywords: Arterial pulse waveform analysis; Claims database; FloTrac/Vigileo system; Goal-directed therapy; Non-cardiac surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30617547 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-02609-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anesth ISSN: 0913-8668 Impact factor: 2.078