Literature DB >> 26961821

Hemodynamic monitoring and management in high-risk surgery: a survey among Japanese anesthesiologists.

Koichi Suehiro1,2, Katsuaki Tanaka3, Akira Mukai3, Alexandre Joosten4, Olivier Desebbe5,6, Brenton Alexander7, Maxime Cannesson8, Kiyonobu Nishikawa3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the current practices of hemodynamic management in high-risk surgical patients among Japanese anesthesiologists. An invitation letter to the survey, which included 35 questions related to hemodynamic monitoring in high-risk surgery, was mailed to every hospital approved by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) (1260 hospitals). Of the 692 JSA respondents, 573 completed the survey. Despite reporting a high rate of cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation (SVV) monitoring in JSA members (70 and 74 %, respectively), fluid goal-directed therapy was poorly implemented in high-risk surgery (7.4 %). Also, 47 % of the JSA respondents did not consistently perform CO optimization. SVV was more commonly used (76 %) as an indicator of volume expansion among JSA respondents, while central venous pressure was less frequently used (48 %). Despite a broader use of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, optimization of CO is still poorly protocolized and applied in Japan. The development of guidelines and protocols for hemodynamic management, including the establishment of strong evidence aimed at improving clinical outcomes, is needed to assist anesthesiologists in more universal adoption of perioperative CO optimization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Goal-directed therapy; Hemodynamics; Intraoperative; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26961821     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-016-2155-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  21 in total

1.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Influence of tidal volume for stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Ryu Okutani
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing airway pressure release ventilation.

Authors:  K Suehiro; H Rinka; J Ishikawa; A Fuke; H Arimoto; T Miyaichi
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.669

4.  Current practice in hemodynamic monitoring and management in high-risk surgery patients: a national survey of Korean anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Kim; Min-Jae Kim; Joon-Ho Lee; Sung-Hwan Cho; Won-Seok Chae; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-07-19

5.  Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.

Authors:  David Osman; Christophe Ridel; Patrick Ray; Xavier Monnet; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Ryu Okutani
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia.

Authors:  A K Kable; R W Gibberd; A D Spigelman
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 8.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery.

Authors:  Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review.

Authors:  Rupert M Pearse; David A Harrison; Neil MacDonald; Michael A Gillies; Mark Blunt; Gareth Ackland; Michael P W Grocott; Aoife Ahern; Kathryn Griggs; Rachael Scott; Charles Hinds; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Utilization of arterial pulse waveform analysis during non-cardiac surgery in Japan: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide claims database.

Authors:  Chikashi Takeda; Masato Takeuchi; Toshiyuki Mizota; Hiroshi Yonekura; Isao Nahara; Aki Kuwauchi; Woo Jin Joo; Yohei Kawasaki; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Pre-anesthetic stroke volume variation can predict cardiac output decrease and hypotension during induction of general anesthesia.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Sayaka Tsujimoto; Shigemune Kuwata; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.