Literature DB >> 30616826

Genetic manipulation of PLB-985 cells and quantification of chemotaxis using the underagarose assay.

Cosmo A Saunders1, Ritankar Majumdar1, Yaniris Molina2, Bhagawat C Subramanian3, Carole A Parent4.   

Abstract

Neutrophils are the most common leukocyte in human blood and are the first cells to respond to injury and infection. Improper neutrophil chemotaxis can have deleterious effects on human health, including autoimmune diseases, poor innate immune response, and cancer. Therefore, gaining a better understanding of the signaling pathways governing chemotactic responses in these cells is important. One of the main challenges of working with primary human neutrophils is their short lifespan (about 1 day), making genetic manipulations not feasible. PLB-985 cells, which are pluripotent hematopoietic cells that can easily be differentiated to neutrophil-like cells, are amenable to genetic manipulations, including the expression of fluorescently tagged proteins-of-interest (POI) and gene editing using the CRISPR/CAS9 system to delete genes-of-interest (GOI). The use of PLB-985 cells can therefore greatly facilitate our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing neutrophil biology during chemotaxis and serve as a good system to complement results gained from pharmacological inhibition of primary neutrophils. To better study the role and localization of proteins during chemotaxis, the underagarose assay has become a widely used and quantitative assay for measuring several aspects of chemotaxis. The objective of this chapter is to provide protocols for (1) the generation of genetically altered PLB-985 cell lines, (2) the set-up of an underagarose chemotaxis assay, and (3) the analysis of cell movement in chemotactic gradients from an underagarose experiment.
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/CAS9; Chemotaxis; Live-cell imaging; Microscopy; Migration; Neutrophil; PLB-985; Signaling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30616826      PMCID: PMC8193907          DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2018.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Cell Biol        ISSN: 0091-679X            Impact factor:   1.441


  23 in total

1.  Chemotaxis under agarose: a new and simple method for measuring chemotaxis and spontaneous migration of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes.

Authors:  R D Nelson; P G Quie; R L Simmons
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Regulation of cell polarity during eukaryotic chemotaxis: the chemotactic compass.

Authors:  Orion D Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 3.  Microfluidic technologies for temporal perturbations of chemotaxis.

Authors:  Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Chemotaxis in leukocytes.

Authors:  M McCUTCHEON
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1946-07       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Fluorescent proteins at a glance.

Authors:  Gert-Jan Kremers; Sarah G Gilbert; Paula J Cranfill; Michael W Davidson; David W Piston
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  mTORC2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in a cAMP- and RhoA-dependent fashion.

Authors:  Lunhua Liu; Satarupa Das; Wolfgang Losert; Carole A Parent
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  LTB4 is a signal-relay molecule during neutrophil chemotaxis.

Authors:  Philippe V Afonso; Mirkka Janka-Junttila; Young Jong Lee; Colin P McCann; Charlotte M Oliver; Khaled A Aamer; Wolfgang Losert; Marcus T Cicerone; Carole A Parent
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  The chemotactic effect of mixtures of antibody and antigen on polymorphonuclear leucocytes.

Authors:  S BOYDEN
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1962-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Modeling neutrophil migration in dynamic chemoattractant gradients: assessing the role of exosomes during signal relay.

Authors:  Alex C Szatmary; Ralph Nossal; Carole A Parent; Ritankar Majumdar
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 10.  Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Zhang; Louis Y Tee; Xiao-Gang Wang; Qun-Shan Huang; Shi-Hua Yang
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 10.183

View more
  3 in total

1.  C3a elicits unique migratory responses in immature low-density neutrophils.

Authors:  Brian E Hsu; Joannie Roy; Jack Mouhanna; Roni F Rayes; LeeAnn Ramsay; Sébastien Tabariès; Matthew G Annis; Ian R Watson; Jonathan D Spicer; Santiago Costantino; Peter M Siegel
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Ceramide-rich microdomains facilitate nuclear envelope budding for non-conventional exosome formation.

Authors:  Subhash B Arya; Song Chen; Fatima Jordan-Javed; Carole A Parent
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 28.213

3.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Recruit Neutrophils by Secreting TGF-β and CXCR2 Ligands.

Authors:  Shuvasree SenGupta; Lauren E Hein; Yang Xu; Jason Zhang; Jamie R Konwerski; Ye Li; Craig Johnson; Dawen Cai; Janet L Smith; Carole A Parent
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 8.786

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.