Literature DB >> 30611756

The effect of expectation on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to suppress food craving and eating in individuals with overweight and obesity.

Mary Katherine Ray1, Maria D Sylvester1, Alexis Helton1, Bethany R Pittman1, Laura E Wagstaff1, Tommy R McRae1, Bulent Turan1, Kevin R Fontaine2, Franklin R Amthor1, Mary M Boggiano3.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique with potential to treat eating disorders and obesity. As for any potential treatment, it is important to assess the degree to which expectation effects contribute to its reported efficacy. This study assessed the effect of tDCS on amount of food craving and eating while tightly controlling treatment expectation. N = 74 adults with overweight or obesity were informed of the known effects of tDCS to suppress craving and eating. Once electrodes were on the head, half of the participants were told they were receiving real, and the other half sham tDCS. Within these groups, approximately half actually received real and the other half sham tDCS. Stimulation parameters used were those previously found to reduce craving and eating, including in our lab: 2 mA, anode right/cathode left targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 min (real), or only for the first and last minute (sham). Analyses controlled for demographics, hunger, trait impulsiveness, eating motives, dieting, binge eating, suggestibility, and baseline craving and eating. Participants told they were receiving real tDCS craved and ate less than participants told they were receiving sham tDCS (both p < 0.01), regardless of tDCS condition administered. There was no main effect of real vs. sham tDCS on craving or eating or an interaction between tDCS condition and expectation. The scientific validation of tDCS as a treatment for eating-related conditions hinges on controlling for the powerful effects of expectation. This can include the type of information provided on consent forms and participants' ability to guess real from sham conditions. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Neuromodulation; Placebo; Psychological; Suggestibility

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30611756      PMCID: PMC6430671          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  33 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the clinical efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Maria Kekic; Elena Boysen; Iain C Campbell; Ulrike Schmidt
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Helen S Mayberg; Tor D Wager; Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The effects of prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and temporal discounting in women with frequent food cravings.

Authors:  Maria Kekic; Jessica McClelland; Iain Campbell; Steffen Nestler; Katya Rubia; Anthony S David; Ulrike Schmidt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - application in neuropsychology.

Authors:  Yong-Il Shin; Águida Foerster; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Profiling motives behind hedonic eating. Preliminary validation of the Palatable Eating Motives Scale.

Authors:  E E Burgess; B Turan; K L Lokken; A Morse; M M Boggiano
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Food craving, food choice and consumption: The role of impulsivity and sham-controlled tDCS stimulation of the right dlPFC.

Authors:  Claudio Georgii; Philipp Goldhofer; Adrian Meule; Anna Richard; Jens Blechert
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-08

8.  Neuromodulation of conditioned placebo/nocebo in heat pain: anodal vs cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Rongjun Yu; Navneet Kaur; Mark Vangel; Randy L Gollub; Darin D Dougherty; Jian Kong; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.926

9.  Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2mA.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; John Cossar; Louise Marston; Benedict M Wand; David Bunce; G Lorimer Moseley; Lorraine H De Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be).

Authors:  Jared C Horvath; Olivia Carter; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-24
View more
  9 in total

1.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and eating when using a control method that minimizes guessing of the real vs. control condition.

Authors:  Carl E Stevens; Marissa A Lausen; Laura E Wagstaff; Tommy R McRae; Bethany R Pittman; Franklin R Amthor; Mary M Boggiano
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 2.  Electroceuticals in the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Khalil B Ramadi; Shriya S Srinivasan; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Relationship between trait suggestibility and eating-related behaviors in overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Ashley E Zachmann; Caroline V Caudill; Mary M Boggiano
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2020-03-02

Review 4.  Food Addiction: Implications for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Overeating.

Authors:  Rachel C Adams; Jemma Sedgmond; Leah Maizey; Christopher D Chambers; Natalia S Lawrence
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Combined antisaccade task and transcranial direct current stimulation to increase response inhibition in binge eating disorder.

Authors:  Sebastian M Max; Christian Plewnia; Stephan Zipfel; Katrin E Giel; Kathrin Schag
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 6.  Neurobiological regulation of eating behavior: Evidence based on non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Theresa Ester; Stephanie Kullmann
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Investigating the effects of tDCS on Visual Orientation Discrimination Task Performance: 'The possible influence of placebo'.

Authors:  A BinDawood; A Dickinson; A Aytemur; C Howarth; E Milne; M Jones
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2019-11-09

8.  Comparison of two tDCS protocols on pain and EEG alpha-2 oscillations in women with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Géssika Araújo de Melo; Eliane Araújo de Oliveira; Suellen Mary Marinho Dos Santos Andrade; Bernardino Fernández-Calvo; Nelson Torro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory.

Authors:  Marija Stanković; Marko Živanović; Jovana Bjekić; Saša R Filipović
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.