Literature DB >> 32747876

Investigating the effects of tDCS on Visual Orientation Discrimination Task Performance: 'The possible influence of placebo'.

A BinDawood1,2, A Dickinson3, A Aytemur1, C Howarth1, E Milne1, M Jones1.   

Abstract

The non-invasive neuromodulation technique tDCS offers the promise of a low cost tool for both research and clinical applications in psychology, psychiatry and neuroscience. However, findings regarding its efficacy are often equivocal. A key issue is that the clinical and cognitive applications studied are often complex and thus effects of tDCS are difficult to predict given its known effects on the basic underlying neurophysiology, namely alterations in cortical inhibition-excitation balance. As such, it may be beneficial to assess the effects of tDCS in tasks whose performance has a clear link to cortical inhibition-excitation balance such as the visual orientation discrimination task (ODT). In prior studies in our laboratory no practise effects were found during 2 consecutive runs of the ODT, thus in the current investigation, to examine the effects of tDCS, subjects received 10 minutes of 2mA occipital tDCS (sham, anode, cathode) between a first and second run of ODT. Surprisingly, subjects' performance significantly improved in the second run of ODT compared to the first one regardless of the tDCS stimulation type they received (anodal, cathodal, or sham-tDCS). Possible causes for such an improvement could have been due to either a generic 'placebo' effect of tDCS (as all subjects received some form of tDCS) or an increased delay period between the two runs of ODT of the current study compared to our previous work (10 minutes duration required to administer tDCS as opposed to ~2 minutes in previous studies as a 'break'). As such, we tested these two possibilities with a subsequent experiment in which subjects received 2 minutes or 10 minutes delay between the 2 runs (with no tDCS) or 10 minutes of sham-tDCS. Only sham-tDCS resulted in improved performance thus these data add to a growing literature suggesting that tDCS has powerful placebo effect that may occur even in the absence of active cortical modulation.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32747876      PMCID: PMC7115888          DOI: 10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc        ISSN: 2509-3304


  122 in total

1.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 2.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Jason D Forte; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Effects of High-Definition and Conventional tDCS on Response Inhibition.

Authors:  J Hogeveen; J Grafman; M Aboseria; A David; M Bikson; K K Hauner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments.

Authors:  R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; J Arturo Silva; Steven K Brannan; Janet L Tekell; Roderick K Mahurin; Scott McGinnis; Paul A Jerabek
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C S Furmanski; S A Engel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in depression.

Authors:  Colleen K Loo; Mustafa M Husain; William M McDonald; Scott Aaronson; John P O'Reardon; Angelo Alonzo; Cynthia Shannon Weickert; Donel M Martin; Shawn M McClintock; Adith Mohan; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  The placebo treatments in neurosciences: New insights from clinical and neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Nico J Diederich; Christopher G Goetz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Boosting long-term memory via wakeful rest: intentional rehearsal is not necessary, consolidation is sufficient.

Authors:  Michaela Dewar; Jessica Alber; Nelson Cowan; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices Transiently Improves Tactile Spatial Discrimination in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shuhei Fujimoto; Noriko Kon; Yohei Otaka; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Takeo Nakayama; Kunitsugu Kondo; Patrick Ragert; Satoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Attention neuroenhancement through tDCS or neurofeedback: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Gabriel Gaudencio Rêgo; Óscar F Gonçalves; Paulo Sérgio Boggio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effects of Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Retention of Performance Gains on an Obstacle Negotiation Task in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sudeshna A Chatterjee; Rachael D Seidler; Jared W Skinner; Paige E Lysne; Chanoan Sumonthee; Samuel S Wu; Ronald A Cohen; Dorian K Rose; Adam J Woods; David J Clark
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies.

Authors:  Alessandra Vergallito; Alessia Gallucci; Alberto Pisoni; Mariacristina Punzi; Gabriele Caselli; Giovanni M Ruggiero; Sandra Sassaroli; Leonor J Romero Lauro
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory.

Authors:  Marija Stanković; Marko Živanović; Jovana Bjekić; Saša R Filipović
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.