N A Rutkowski1,2, S Lebel1, K Richardson1, B Mutsaers1, M Chasen2,3,4,5, A Feldstain1,2,6. 1. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 2. Bruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, ON. 3. Department of Medicine, William Osler Health System, Toronto, ON. 4. Department of Palliative Medicine, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, ON. 5. Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 6. Department of Psychosocial and Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB.
Abstract
Background: Social support has been shown to buffer some difficulties of living with advanced cancer. The Palliative Rehabilitation Program (prp) was an interdisciplinary outpatient program offering post-treatment palliative rehabilitation to patients with advanced cancer. Social support was directly integrated into the program. The aim of the present study was to examine the types and sources of social support that patients found most beneficial. Methods: Twelve patients participated in 30-minute semi-structured interviews. Thematic content analysis was used to explore the social support experiences of those patients in the prp. Patients were eligible to participate in the interview if they had completed the 8-week prp, spoke English, and did not have cognitive or auditory impairments affecting their ability to participate. Results: The main sources of support reported by participants were team members and spouse, family, or close friends; peers attending the program; and spiritual beliefs. Social support varied based on sex and age, such that, compared with women, men reported relying less on social support, and the supportive needs of younger (≤50 years of age) and older participants differed. Team members were endorsed as frequently as family as social support. Discussion: Emotional support was endorsed with the greatest frequency. The members of the interdisciplinary care team were also providers of emotional and informational support for patients, bolstering the support received from caregivers. Widowed or divorced women might rely on health care providers more readily than do married men, who chose their wives as support. Future rehabilitation programs might consider the importance of an interdisciplinary team, the formal integration of caregivers, and the incorporation of spirituality to meet the unique supportive needs of patients with advanced cancer.
Background: Social support has been shown to buffer some difficulties of living with advanced cancer. The Palliative Rehabilitation Program (prp) was an interdisciplinary outpatient program offering post-treatment palliative rehabilitation to patients with advanced cancer. Social support was directly integrated into the program. The aim of the present study was to examine the types and sources of social support that patients found most beneficial. Methods: Twelve patients participated in 30-minute semi-structured interviews. Thematic content analysis was used to explore the social support experiences of those patients in the prp. Patients were eligible to participate in the interview if they had completed the 8-week prp, spoke English, and did not have cognitive or auditory impairments affecting their ability to participate. Results: The main sources of support reported by participants were team members and spouse, family, or close friends; peers attending the program; and spiritual beliefs. Social support varied based on sex and age, such that, compared with women, men reported relying less on social support, and the supportive needs of younger (≤50 years of age) and older participants differed. Team members were endorsed as frequently as family as social support. Discussion: Emotional support was endorsed with the greatest frequency. The members of the interdisciplinary care team were also providers of emotional and informational support for patients, bolstering the support received from caregivers. Widowed or divorced women might rely on health care providers more readily than do married men, who chose their wives as support. Future rehabilitation programs might consider the importance of an interdisciplinary team, the formal integration of caregivers, and the incorporation of spirituality to meet the unique supportive needs of patients with advanced cancer.
Authors: Catherine Benedict; Jason R Dahn; Michael H Antoni; Lara Traeger; Bruce Kava; Natalie Bustillo; Eric S Zhou; Frank J Penedo Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Sara R Alcorn; Michael J Balboni; Holly G Prigerson; Amy Reynolds; Andrea C Phelps; Alexi A Wright; Susan D Block; John R Peteet; Lisa A Kachnic; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Shiraz I Mishra; Roberta W Scherer; Claire Snyder; Paula Geigle; Carolyn Gotay Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Heather S L Jim; James E Pustejovsky; Crystal L Park; Suzanne C Danhauer; Allen C Sherman; George Fitchett; Thomas V Merluzzi; Alexis R Munoz; Login George; Mallory A Snyder; John M Salsman Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: N Haj Mohammad; A W Walter; M G H van Oijen; M C C M Hulshof; J J G H M Bergman; M C J Anderegg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; I Henselmans; M A G Sprangers; H W M van Laarhoven Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 3.603