BACKGROUND: This study sought to inductively derive core themes of religion and/or spirituality (R/S) active in patients' experiences of advanced cancer to inform the development of spiritual care interventions in the terminally ill cancer setting. METHODS: This is a multisite, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study of randomly-selected patients with advanced cancer (n = 68). Scripted interviews assessed the role of R/S and R/S concerns encountered in the advanced cancer experience. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed. Theme extraction was performed with interdisciplinary input (sociology of religion, medicine, theology), utilizing grounded theory. Spearman correlations determined the degree of association between R/S themes. Predictors of R/S concerns were assessed using linear regression and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Most participants (n = 53, 78%) stated that R/S had been important to the cancer experience. In descriptions of how R/S was related to the cancer experience, five primary R/S themes emerged: coping, practices, beliefs, transformation, and community. Most interviews (75%) contained two or more R/S themes, with 45% mentioning three or more R/S themes. Multiple significant subtheme interrelationships were noted between the primary R/S themes. Most participants (85%) identified 1 or more R/S concerns, with types of R/S concerns spanning the five R/S themes. Younger, more religious, and more spiritual patients identified R/S concerns more frequently (beta = -0.11, p < 0.001; beta = 0.83, p = 0.03; and beta = 0.89, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: R/S plays a variety of important and inter-related roles for most advanced cancer patients. Future research is needed to determine how spiritual care can incorporate these five themes and address R/S concerns.
BACKGROUND: This study sought to inductively derive core themes of religion and/or spirituality (R/S) active in patients' experiences of advanced cancer to inform the development of spiritual care interventions in the terminally ill cancer setting. METHODS: This is a multisite, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study of randomly-selected patients with advanced cancer (n = 68). Scripted interviews assessed the role of R/S and R/S concerns encountered in the advanced cancer experience. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed. Theme extraction was performed with interdisciplinary input (sociology of religion, medicine, theology), utilizing grounded theory. Spearman correlations determined the degree of association between R/S themes. Predictors of R/S concerns were assessed using linear regression and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Most participants (n = 53, 78%) stated that R/S had been important to the cancer experience. In descriptions of how R/S was related to the cancer experience, five primary R/S themes emerged: coping, practices, beliefs, transformation, and community. Most interviews (75%) contained two or more R/S themes, with 45% mentioning three or more R/S themes. Multiple significant subtheme interrelationships were noted between the primary R/S themes. Most participants (85%) identified 1 or more R/S concerns, with types of R/S concerns spanning the five R/S themes. Younger, more religious, and more spiritual patients identified R/S concerns more frequently (beta = -0.11, p < 0.001; beta = 0.83, p = 0.03; and beta = 0.89, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: R/S plays a variety of important and inter-related roles for most advanced cancerpatients. Future research is needed to determine how spiritual care can incorporate these five themes and address R/S concerns.
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Amenah Babar; Jennifer Dillinger; Andrea C Phelps; Emily George; Susan D Block; Lisa Kachnic; Jessica Hunt; John Peteet; Holly G Prigerson; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Virginia T LeBaron; Amanda Cooke; Jonathan Resmini; Alexander Garinther; Vinca Chow; Rebecca Quiñones; Sarah Noveroske; Andrew Baccari; Patrick T Smith; John Peteet; Tracy A Balboni; Michael J Balboni Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Danielle Rodin; Michael Balboni; Christine Mitchell; Patrick T Smith; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Andrea C Enzinger; Patrick T Smith; Christine Mitchell; John R Peteet; James A Tulsky; Tyler VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Tracy Balboni; Michael Balboni; M Elizabeth Paulk; Andrea Phelps; Alexi Wright; John Peteet; Susan Block; Chris Lathan; Tyler Vanderweele; Holly Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Adaugo Amobi; Andrea C Phelps; Daniel P Gorman; Angelika Zollfrank; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson; Tyler J Vanderweele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Heather S L Jim; James E Pustejovsky; Crystal L Park; Suzanne C Danhauer; Allen C Sherman; George Fitchett; Thomas V Merluzzi; Alexis R Munoz; Login George; Mallory A Snyder; John M Salsman Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 6.860