Hanne Bess Boelsbjerg1,2, Geana Paula Kurita3,4,5, Per Sjøgren6,7, Niels Viggo Hansen8. 1. Interacting Minds Centre, Clinical Institute, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark. 2. Interdisciplinary Research Unit, Elective Surgery Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark. 3. Palliative Research Group, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. geana.kurita@regionh.dk. 4. Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Respiratory Support, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. geana.kurita@regionh.dk. 5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. geana.kurita@regionh.dk. 6. Palliative Research Group, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 8. Danish Center for Mindfulness, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer often experience cognitive dysfunction, which may influence decision making, self-perception, and existential well-being. However, there is little evidence regarding this issue. This study analysed associations between objective neuropsychological measures and patients' self-report of cognitive dysfunction interfering with everyday life, general well-being, and sense of existential value. METHODS: A mixed method study assessed 13 adult patients with advanced cancer with validated neuropsychological tests, which assessed sustained attention, psychomotor speed, memory/attention, mental flexibility, and a measure of global cognitive function. These were followed by semi-structured interviews focusing on subjective experiences of cognitive dysfunction. Agreement between subjective and objective measures were analysed by Cohen's Kappa (k). Thematic analysis explored associations with cognitive deficits. RESULTS: Poor cognitive performance on the neuropsychological tests was observed regarding sustained attention (n = 8), psychomotor speed (n = 1), memory/attention (n = 2), mental flexibility (n = 9), and global cognitive function (n = 3). Almost all patients (n = 12) had complaints of cognitive dysfunction. However, the agreement between the two assessments was weak (k ≤ 0.264). Cognitive dysfunction challenged the patients with regard to practice everyday life including their existential values related to meaning of life and well-being. Adjustment of the sense of living according to one's existential values and changes of self-perception were also related positively and negatively to existential well-being. CONCLUSION: Despite the weak agreement between objective and subjective measures of cognitive function, many of the patients reported experiences of cognitive dysfunction that had an impact on their daily life and existential well-being, adding to the suffering experienced.
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer often experience cognitive dysfunction, which may influence decision making, self-perception, and existential well-being. However, there is little evidence regarding this issue. This study analysed associations between objective neuropsychological measures and patients' self-report of cognitive dysfunction interfering with everyday life, general well-being, and sense of existential value. METHODS: A mixed method study assessed 13 adult patients with advanced cancer with validated neuropsychological tests, which assessed sustained attention, psychomotor speed, memory/attention, mental flexibility, and a measure of global cognitive function. These were followed by semi-structured interviews focusing on subjective experiences of cognitive dysfunction. Agreement between subjective and objective measures were analysed by Cohen's Kappa (k). Thematic analysis explored associations with cognitive deficits. RESULTS: Poor cognitive performance on the neuropsychological tests was observed regarding sustained attention (n = 8), psychomotor speed (n = 1), memory/attention (n = 2), mental flexibility (n = 9), and global cognitive function (n = 3). Almost all patients (n = 12) had complaints of cognitive dysfunction. However, the agreement between the two assessments was weak (k ≤ 0.264). Cognitive dysfunction challenged the patients with regard to practice everyday life including their existential values related to meaning of life and well-being. Adjustment of the sense of living according to one's existential values and changes of self-perception were also related positively and negatively to existential well-being. CONCLUSION: Despite the weak agreement between objective and subjective measures of cognitive function, many of the patients reported experiences of cognitive dysfunction that had an impact on their daily life and existential well-being, adding to the suffering experienced.
Authors: Michelle C Janelsins; Sadhna Kohli; Supriya G Mohile; Kenneth Usuki; Tim A Ahles; Gary R Morrow Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Geana Paula Kurita; Marlene Sandvad; Lena Lundorff; Cibele Andrucioli De Mattos-Pimenta; Jette Højsted; Per Sjøgren Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2017-08-07
Authors: Jamie Arndt; Enny Das; Sanne B Schagen; Stephanie A Reid-Arndt; Linda D Cameron; Tim A Ahles Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 3.894