| Literature DB >> 30603539 |
Yongseok Yoon1,2, Imdad Ullah Khan1,2, Kyeong Uk Choi1,2, Taeseong Jung1,2, Kwangrae Jo1,2, Su-Hyung Lee3,2, Wan Hee Kim1, Dae-Yong Kim3,2, Oh-Kyeong Kweon1,2.
Abstract
Cell sheets technology is being available for fracture healing. This study was performed to clarify bone healing mechanism of undifferentiated (UCS) and osteogenic (OCS) differentiated mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) sheets in the fracture model of dogs. UCS and OCS were harvested at 10 days of culture. Transverse fractures at the radius of six beagle dogs were assigned into three groups (n = 4 in each group) i.e. UCS, OCS and control. The fractures were fixed with a 2.7 mm locking plate and six screws. Cell sheets were wrapped around the fracture site. Bones were harvested 8 weeks after operation, then scanned by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and analyzed histopathologically. The micro-CT revealed different aspects of bone regeneration among the groups. The percentages of external callus volume out of total bone volume in control, UCS, and OCS groups were 42.1, 13.0 and 4.9% (p < 0.05) respectively. However, the percentages of limbs having connectivity of gaps were 25, 12.5 and 75% respectively. In histopathological assessments, OCS group showed well organized and mature woven bone with peripheral cartilage at the fracture site, whereas control group showed cartilage formation without bone maturation or ossification at the fracture site. Meanwhile, fracture site was only filled with fibrous connective tissue without endochondral ossification and bone formation in UCS group. It was suggested that the MSC sheets reduced the quantity of external callus, and OCS induced the primary bone healing.Entities:
Keywords: Bone healing; Dog; MSCs sheet; Osteogenic differentiation; Undifferentiation
Year: 2017 PMID: 30603539 PMCID: PMC6171633 DOI: 10.1007/s13770-017-0092-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tissue Eng Regen Med ISSN: 1738-2696 Impact factor: 4.169
Canine primers used for real-time PCR
| Primer | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | CATTGCCCTCAATGACCACT | TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTAGAC |
| BMP-7 | TCGTGGAGCATGACAAAGAG | GCTCCCGAATGTAGTCCTTG |
| RUNX2 | TGTCATGGCGGGTAACGAT | TCCGGCCCACAAATCTCA |
| TGF-B | CTCAGTGCCCACTGTTCCTG | TCCGTGGAGCTGAAGCAGTA |
| IL-10 | CCTGGGAGAGAAGCTCAAGA | TGTTCTCCAGCACGTTTCAG |
| 1L-6 | TTTTCTGCCAGTGCCTCTTT | GGCTACTGCTTTCCCTACCC |
| Cox-2 | ACCCGCCATTATCCTAATCC | TCGGAGTTCTCCTGGCTTTA |
Fig. 1Implantation of cell sheets. Radii were fixed with seven hole locking plate. In UCS and OCS groups, cell sheets were applied to fill and surround the gap. Black arrow indicates cell sheets
Fig. 2Osteogenic differentiation and inflammatory-related gene expression profiles of u-MSC, UCS and OCS at 10 days of culture. A The expressions of TGF-β mRNA in UCS and OCS groups were considerably upregulated compared to the u-MSC. B, C RUNX2 and BMP7 were up-regulated in OCS compared to both u-MSC and UCS. D–G Expressions of COX-2, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α in UCS were markedly upregulated compared to u-MSC and OCS. H In case of HGF, both group showed upregulated compare to control. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. ‘*’ represents statistically significant difference (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Radiographic changes of bone healing in relation to weeks. A, D, G Control group at 2 weeks showed external callus but other groups did not. B, E External callus in control group became larger but osteolysis was observed in UCS group. C The callus at 8 weeks was larger than at 4 weeks in control group. F, I But in UCS and OCS groups, external callus was not observed as much as control group and OCS group at 8 weeks showed connectivity between the gap
Fig. 4Micro-CT images at fracture sites and morphologic analysis of bone healing. Large bony callus formation was observed in the control but connectivity between cortical bones was not. A–C UCS and OCS groups showed no significant callus formation. In OCS group, there was connectivity between cortices, and the gaps were filled with materials which were similar attenuation as normal bone. D The percentage of external callus volume out of total bone volume in OCS group significantly decreased compared to the control (p < 0.05). E The percentages of limbs which had connectivity between cortices were 25, 12.5 and 75% respectively
Fig. 5H&E staining of fracture sites at 4 weeks without decalcification. E, F The OCS treated group showed peripheral cartilage at the fracture site at 4 weeks. A–D However, control and UCS-treated groups did not have bone healing sign at the fracture site
Fig. 6Histopathological findings and histomorphometric analysis of fracture sites at 8 weeks post cell sheets grafting. A–C Control group showed cartilage formation (*) without ossification at fracture site. D–F UCS group showed that the fracture site was filled with fibrous connective tissue (#) with less endochondral ossification or bone formation. G–I OCS group showed that the fracture site was well organized with peripheral cartilage and mature woven bone. J Scale bar: 100 μm. OCS group showed significant increased mature bone compare to control and UCS group. K Control group showed definitely increased cartilage compare to OCS. L Fibrous connective tissue was increased in UCS group. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. * represent a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). H&E staining, Masson’s trichrome staining