Campbell D Flynn1,2, Ashley R Wilson-Smith2,3, Tristan D Yan2,3,4. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia. 2. CORE Research Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. 3. School of Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia. 4. Sydney Adventist Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world; in industrialized nations, mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular lesion. Untreated, severe MR has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year mortality rate of up to 50%. Surgical repair of symptomatic, severe primary MR has been demonstrated to improve survival. The aim of this review is to assess the early outcomes of newly developed transcatheter mitral valve implantation technologies for the treatment of secondary native valve disease. Furthermore, the outcomes of patients receiving transcatheter treatment of regurgitant failure of surgically repaired or replaced mitral valve has also been addressed. METHODS: A systematic review of twenty-five studies assessing the outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve implantation for native mitral regurgitation or failed prior surgical repair or bioprosthetic replacement was carried out. RESULTS: The outcomes of 112 patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement for secondary mitral regurgitation using six different valve systems were assessed. There were 15 early deaths and 24 deaths over the follow-up period. The outcomes of 44 patients undergoing transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement were assessed with an overall mortality of ten patients. There were 20 patients included who had valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral replacement for previous failed repair. The total mortality was five patients during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter mitral valve implantation represents a new evolution in management of valvular disease and affords management options to patients who historically may not have been offered treatment. Early results have demonstrated some promise and improvements in technology, imaging modalities and patient selection will surely result in a reliable and durable valve.
BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world; in industrialized nations, mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular lesion. Untreated, severe MR has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year mortality rate of up to 50%. Surgical repair of symptomatic, severe primary MR has been demonstrated to improve survival. The aim of this review is to assess the early outcomes of newly developed transcatheter mitral valve implantation technologies for the treatment of secondary native valve disease. Furthermore, the outcomes of patients receiving transcatheter treatment of regurgitant failure of surgically repaired or replaced mitral valve has also been addressed. METHODS: A systematic review of twenty-five studies assessing the outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve implantation for native mitral regurgitation or failed prior surgical repair or bioprosthetic replacement was carried out. RESULTS: The outcomes of 112 patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement for secondary mitral regurgitation using six different valve systems were assessed. There were 15 early deaths and 24 deaths over the follow-up period. The outcomes of 44 patients undergoing transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement were assessed with an overall mortality of ten patients. There were 20 patients included who had valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral replacement for previous failed repair. The total mortality was five patients during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter mitral valve implantation represents a new evolution in management of valvular disease and affords management options to patients who historically may not have been offered treatment. Early results have demonstrated some promise and improvements in technology, imaging modalities and patient selection will surely result in a reliable and durable valve.
Authors: Zainab Samad; Prashant Kaul; Linda K Shaw; Donald D Glower; Eric J Velazquez; Pamela S Douglas; James G Jollis Journal: Heart Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Karl K C Poon; Andrew Clarke; Sushil A Luis; Paul Wiemers; Alexander Incani; Gregory Scalia; Peter Tesar; Owen Christopher Raffel; Constantine N Aroney; Darren L Walters Journal: Heart Lung Circ Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 2.975
Authors: Sachin S Goel; Navkaranbir Bajaj; Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Supriya Gupta; Kanhaiya Lal Poddar; Mobolaji Ige; Hazem Bdair; Abed Anabtawi; Shiraz Rahim; Patrick L Whitlow; E Murat Tuzcu; Brian P Griffin; William J Stewart; Marc Gillinov; Eugene H Blackstone; Nicholas G Smedira; Guilherme H Oliveira; Benico Barzilai; Venu Menon; Samir R Kapadia Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Moritz Seiffert; Lenard Conradi; Stephan Baldus; Johannes Schirmer; Malgorzata Knap; Stefan Blankenberg; Hermann Reichenspurner; Hendrik Treede Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Fleur Descoutures; Dominique Himbert; Francesco Maisano; Filip Casselman; Arend de Weger; Oana Bodea; Frank Van der Kley; Antonio Colombo; Cristina Giannini; Kjell Arne Rein; Bernard De Bruyne; Anna Sonia Petronio; Gry Dahle; Ottavio Alfieri; Alec Vahanian Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Manuel Wilbring; Konstantin Alexiou; Sems Malte Tugtekin; Bjoern Sill; Peter Hammer; Torsten Schmidt; Gregor Simonis; Klaus Matschke; Utz Kappert Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Katrin Hemmann; Margarita Sirotina; Salvatore De Rosa; Joachim R Ehrlich; Henrik Fox; Johannes Weber; Anton Moritz; Andreas M Zeiher; Ilona Hofmann; Volker Schächinger; Mirko Doss; Horst Sievert; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Ralf Lehmann Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2013-05-03
Authors: Adam S Evans; Menachem M Weiner; Shahzad Shaefi; Prakash A Patel; Matthew M Townsley; Abirami Kumaresan; Jared W Feinman; Ashley V Fritz; Archer K Martin; Toby B Steinberg; J Ross Renew; Jane L Gui; Brian Radvansky; Himani Bhatt; Sudhakar Subramani; Archit Sharma; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Harish Ramakrishna Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2019-11-09 Impact factor: 2.628