Literature DB >> 24952060

Balloon-expandable valves for degenerated mitral xenografts or failing surgical rings.

Ulrich Schäfer1, Ralf Bader, Christian Frerker, Dimitry Schewel, Thomas Thielsen, Michael Schmoeckel, Felix Kreidel, Karl-Heinz Kuck.   

Abstract

AIMS: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TMViVI) for the treatment of failing mitral xenografts or recurrent mitral regurgitation after surgical ring implantation is an emerging therapy for patients in need of repeated mitral valve surgery. Despite the fact that these procedures have been shown to be feasible and effective, haemodynamic data after TMViVI are still limited in the literature. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twelve patients (logES: 39.2±23.5%) were treated either by transapical (n=7) or transseptal (n=5) TMViVI, as a valve-in-valve (ViV, n=8) or valve-in-ring (ViR, n=4) implantation. Left atrial pressures (LAP), transmitral gradients and right heart haemodynamics (Swan-Ganz catheterisation) were studied before and after TMViVI. Procedural success was 100%, mitral regurgitation after TMViVI was mild in one, trace in five and absent in six patients. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Left atrial pressures decreased significantly after valve implantation (before LAPmean/v-wave: 24.3/44.1 mmHg; after LAP/v-wave 15.9/22.1 mmHg; p<0.001) and cardiac output increased significantly. Transmitral gradients corresponded to mitral surface areas between 1.7 and 3.5 cm2, and were thus very acceptable in terms of the high surgical risk population.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TMViVI with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN XT valve for ViV or ViR implantation is feasible with promising acute transmitral haemodynamic data. Nevertheless, sustained long-term performance remains to be demonstrated in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24952060     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Future interventional procedures for valve diseases].

Authors:  T Thielsen; C Frerker; T Schmidt; M Schlüter; F Kreidel; H Alessandrini; K-H Kuck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  [Mitral valve interventions: Where do we stand?].

Authors:  C Frerker; T Schmidt; F Kreidel; M Schlüter; K-H Kuck
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Transcatheter mitral valve implantation for degenerated mitral bioprostheses or failed surgical annuloplasty rings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junjie Hu; Yan Chen; Sijin Cheng; San Zhang; Kaiqin Wu; Wenli Wang; Yongxin Zhou
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 1.620

4.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation (TMVI) Using Edwards SAPIEN 3 Prostheses in Patients at Very High or Prohibitive Surgical Risk: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Nicolas Werner; Caroline Kilkowski; Dorothee Sutor; Udo Weisse; Steffen Schneider; Ralf Zahn
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve in Valve From the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia Khan; Salman Zahid; Muhammad U Khan; Asim Kichloo; Shakeel Jamal; Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas; Waqas Ullah; Yasar Sattar; Sudarshan Balla
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  Novel mitral valve technologies-transcatheter mitral valve implantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Campbell D Flynn; Ashley R Wilson-Smith; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.