OBJECTIVES: This study reports the results of a series of transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations and aims to offer guidance on technical aspects of the procedure. BACKGROUND: Mitral valve reoperations due to failing bioprostheses are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter techniques may evolve as complementary approaches to surgery in these high-risk patients. METHODS: Six patients (age 75 ± 15 years) received transapical implantation of a balloon-expandable pericardial heart valve into a degenerated bioprosthesis (range 27 to 31 mm) in mitral position at our institution. All patients were considered high risk for surgical valve replacement (logistic EuroSCORE: 33 ± 15%) after evaluation by an interdisciplinary heart team. Procedural and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Implantation was successful in all patients with reduction of mean transvalvular gradients from 11.3 ± 5.2 mm Hg to 5.5 ± 3.6 mm Hg (p = 0.016) and median regurgitation from grade 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.7 to 3.1) to 0 (IQR: 0 to 1.0, p = 0.033) with trace paravalvular regurgitation remaining in 2 patients. Apical bleeding occurred in 2 patients requiring rethoracotomy in 1 and resuscitation in a second patient, the latter of whom died on postoperative day 6. In the remaining patients, median New York Heart Association functional class improved from 3.0 (IQR: 3.0 to 3.5) to 2.0 (IQR: 1.5 to 2.0, p = 0.048) over a median follow-up of 70 (IQR: 25.5 to 358) days. CONCLUSIONS: With acceptable results in a high-risk population, transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation can be considered as a complementary approach to reoperative mitral valve surgery in select patients.
OBJECTIVES: This study reports the results of a series of transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations and aims to offer guidance on technical aspects of the procedure. BACKGROUND:Mitral valve reoperations due to failing bioprostheses are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter techniques may evolve as complementary approaches to surgery in these high-risk patients. METHODS: Six patients (age 75 ± 15 years) received transapical implantation of a balloon-expandable pericardial heart valve into a degenerated bioprosthesis (range 27 to 31 mm) in mitral position at our institution. All patients were considered high risk for surgical valve replacement (logistic EuroSCORE: 33 ± 15%) after evaluation by an interdisciplinary heart team. Procedural and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Implantation was successful in all patients with reduction of mean transvalvular gradients from 11.3 ± 5.2 mm Hg to 5.5 ± 3.6 mm Hg (p = 0.016) and median regurgitation from grade 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.7 to 3.1) to 0 (IQR: 0 to 1.0, p = 0.033) with trace paravalvular regurgitation remaining in 2 patients. Apical bleeding occurred in 2 patients requiring rethoracotomy in 1 and resuscitation in a second patient, the latter of whom died on postoperative day 6. In the remaining patients, median New York Heart Association functional class improved from 3.0 (IQR: 3.0 to 3.5) to 2.0 (IQR: 1.5 to 2.0, p = 0.048) over a median follow-up of 70 (IQR: 25.5 to 358) days. CONCLUSIONS: With acceptable results in a high-risk population, transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation can be considered as a complementary approach to reoperative mitral valve surgery in select patients.
Authors: Jayendrakumar S Patel; Samir R Kapadia; Lourdes Prieto; E Murat Tuzcu; Amar Krishnaswamy Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2015-11
Authors: Navin Natarajan; Parag Patel; Thomas Bartel; Samir Kapadia; Jose Navia; William Stewart; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2016-04