Literature DB >> 30591860

Prognostic and risk factors in patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity.

Taweechok Wisanuyotin1, Winai Sirichativapee1, Chat Sumnanoont1, Permsak Paholpak1, Pat Laupattarakasem1, Kamonsak Sukhonthamarn1, Weerachai Kosuwon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate survival of metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity, and to identify the prognostic factors that influence survival.
METHODS: Patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed from the database of a tertiary university hospital.
RESULTS: Of 102 patients, 48 males and 54 females with a median age of 61 (range, 28-82 years), the humerus (64.7%), clavicle (13.7%), and scapula (12.7%) were the common sites for bone metastasis of an upper extremity. Fifty-nine (57.8%) presented with pathologic fracture. No history of cancer was found in 76.5% of patients. The mean onset of metastatic bone disease after the first diagnosis of primary cancer was 4.74 ± 14.07 months (range, 0-84 months). Lung (31.4%) was the most common primary cancer followed by liver (14.7%), breast (12.7%), thyroid (7.8%), and renal (3.9%). Eighty-two cases (80.39%) died from the disease such that the median survival was 4.08 months (95% CI 2.57-6.17). The significant risk factors were the type of primary tumor (P < 0.001, HR = 4.44; 95% CI, 1.99-9.90) and ECOG performance status (P = 0.021, HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-3.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity have a limited life expectancy. The type of primary tumor and ECOG performance status were the important prognostic factors that influenced overall survival. Our data help in the management of patients, families, and doctors, so as to avoid over- or under-treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metastatic bone disease; Prognostic factors; Survival; Upper extremity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30591860      PMCID: PMC6303409          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Oncol        ISSN: 2212-1366            Impact factor:   4.072


Introduction

As treatment of cancer improves, patients have an increasing life-expectancy but also an increased risk of metastatic bone disease. Patients with metastatic bone disease can present with or without a history of cancer. When they present with bone symptoms—i.e., pain or pathological fracture—the existence of a primary tumor must be ruled out. Examples of typical primary tumors frequently associated with metastasis to bones are lung, breast, kidney and prostate [1]. The treatment of metastatic bone disease includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The choice of surgical procedures in metastatic cancer depends upon the estimated survival of the patient. In patients with a relatively long predicted survival, aggressive treatment(s) and durable implants are appropriate. In cases where life expectancy is short, less invasive or palliative treatment are indicated [2]. Previous studies have indicated that the prognostic factors for metastatic bone disease include age, primary tumors, onset of bone symptoms, pathological fracture, metastasis to other organs, performance score, and pre-operative hemoglobin level [1], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Previous studies regarding the prognostic factors and survival of metastatic bone disease were, however, not specific to metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity [6]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe prognostic and risk factors in patients with the metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity—with the primary tumor being a solid organ. The present study, set at a tertiary university hospital, was conducted (a) to evaluate survival of metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity, and (b) to identify the prognostic factors that influence survival.

Methods

The ethics committee at our institution reviewed and approved the protocol. The authors reviewed all records of patients diagnosed with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity between 2008 and 2015 at the Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, at our tertiary university hospital. The inclusion criteria were patients who presented initially with metastatic bone lesions only in an upper extremity. The exclusion criteria were primary bone tumors. The latter being a hematologic malignancy (i.e., multiple myeloma or lymphoma). The data reviewed were from the Cancer Registry, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The data from 102 patients with metastatic disease of an upper extremity alone were obtained. The retrieved data were age at diagnosis of bone metastasis, history of cancer, type primary tumor, onset of metastatic bone disease after the first diagnosis of primary tumor, presenting with or without pathologic fracture, performance score, location of bone lesion, and visceral and skeletal metastases. Investigations included plain X-ray of the affected limb, chest X-ray, and computed tomography (CT) scan of chest, abdomen, pelvis, and bone. All investigations were performed before a biopsy was done. All pathology slides were reviewed by a single musculoskeletal oncology pathologist.

Statistical analysis

Overall survival time was calculated from the time of admission to our hospital to death or last follow-up visit. The survival analysis was calculated using life table analysis and Kaplan–Meier method. The following parameters: age, sex, onset of metastatic bone disease, primary tumors, Site of metastasis, visceral metastasis, pathological fracture, and performance score were analyzed for validity as prognostic factors. Each prognostic factor was categorized for statistical analysis. Age group was categorized into <60 or ≥60 years. Onset of metastatic bone disease was categorized into no known history of tumor, 1–12 months and >12 months after diagnosis of primary tumor. Primary tumors were categorized according to median survival time into slow (>20 months), moderate (10–20 months) and rapid growth (<10 months) [10]. Visceral metastasis was divided into two groups: with or without metastasis. Pathological fracture was divided into two groups: present or absent fracture. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) was used to evaluate the performance status of the patients, and was categorized into two groups: ECOG PS 0–2 and 3–4 [10]. Site of metastasis was divided into proximal and distal to the elbow joint. The log–rank test was used to screen for potential prognostic value; if any test was significant (P < 0.2) then a Cox regression analyses was performed. P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 19.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

The demographic data are presented in Table 1. Of the 102 patients, 48 were males (47.1%) and 54 were females (52.9%). The median age was 61 years (range, 28–82 years). Fifty-nine (57.8%) patients presented with pathologic fracture. No history of cancer was found in 78 (76.5%) cases. The mean onset of metastatic bone disease after the first diagnosis of primary cancer was 4.74 ± 14.07 months (range, 0–84 months). The rank of site of bone metastasis was the humerus (64.7%), clavicle (13.7%), and scapula (12.7%). Acral metastasis (lesion below the elbow) occurred in 7.8% (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic data.

CharacteristicPatients (N = 102)(%)
Sex
 Male4847.1
 Female5452.9
Age
 <60 years5049
 ≥60 years5251
History of cancer
 Present2423.5
 Not present7876.5
Onset of bone metastasis after diagnosis of primary tumor
 0 month7876.5
 1–12 months1413.7
 >12 months109.8
Pathologic fracture
 Present5957.8
 Absent4342.2
Tumor location
 Scapula1312.7
 Clavicle1413.7
 Humerus6765.7
 Radius32.9
 Ulna22
 Hand32.9
Visceral metastases
 Present6260.8
 Not present3635.3
 Unknown43.9
ECOG performance status
 12827.5
 24948
 32322.5
 Unknown22
Demographic data. The most common primary tumor was lung (31.4%) followed by liver (14.7%), breast (12.7%), thyroid (7.8%), kidney (3.9%), bile duct (cholangiocarcinoma) (2.9%), nasopharynx (2%), and 1% each for the colon, cervix, bladder, endometrium, and esophagus. Adenocarcinoma of unknown origin was 19.6% (Table 2). In 8 cases of acral metastasis, the primary tumor was lung in 7 cases and adenocarcinoma of unknown origin in 1 case.
Table 2

Primary tumors and median survival time.

Primary tumorsNMedian survival (months) (95% CI)
Slow growth
 Endometrium1127.13
Moderate growth
 Breast1311.67 (1.98–32.58)
 Thyroid811.63 (4.3–14.0)
 Nasopharynx210.12
Rapid growth
 Lung325.4 (2.27–8.8)
 Adenocarcinoma of unknown origin201.97 (1.32–7.90)
 Liver152.5 (0.92–4.08)
 Renal44.31
 Bile duct (cholangiocarcinoma)32.1 (0.13–4.07)
 Colon10.33
 Cervix16.53
 Bladder14.53
 Esophagus12.23
Primary tumors and median survival time. The treatments were surgery in 50% of cases, palliative treatment in 44.2% and radiation alone in 5.8%. The surgical procedures included excision (7.8%), cementing after tumor curettage and internal fixation with intramedullary nailing (32.4%), plate and screw (7.8%), endoprosthesis (2%).

Outcome

No patient was lost to follow-up. Eighty-two (80.4%) patients died from the disease with a median survival of 4.08 months (95% CI 2.57–6.17) (Fig. 1). Further analysis was done of 101 of the total 102 cases who had a survival time <64 months. The median survival time was 4.53 months (95% CI 1.84–7.22). None of the patients died from any unrelated causes. The cumulative 1- and 2-year survival was 15.2% and 10.5%, respectively.
Fig. 1

Overall survival in 102 patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity.

Overall survival in 102 patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity. Based on the univariate analysis, 6 prognostic factors warranted further analysis. Age (P = 0.046), primary tumor (P < 0.001), ECOG performance score (P = 0.008), visceral metastasis (P = 0.184), pathological fracture (P = 0.193) and onset of metastatic bone disease (P = 0.026) were found to be statistical significant. In the multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors were the type of primary tumor (P < 0.001, HR = 4.44; 95% CI, 1.99–9.90) and ECOG performance status (P = 0.021, HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.12–3.99) (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses.

VariableUnivariate P-valueHR95% CIMultivariate P-valueHR95% CI
Age0.0461.571.01–2.470.3431.270.77–2.09
Sex0.5080.860.55–1.34
Primary tumors<0.0014.432.23–8.45<0.0014.441.99–9.90
Site of metastasis0.6430.820.36–1.90
ECOG performance status0.0082.021.24–3.300.0212.111.12–3.99
Visceral metastasis0.1840.730.46–1.160.1390.670.40–1.14
Pathological fracture0.1931.350.86–2.130.1691.410.86–2.31
Onset of metastatic bone disease0.0260.660.45–0980.7271.10065–1.88

HR = Hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Univariate and multivariate analyses. HR = Hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Discussion

Most previous studies on survival and prognostic factors in metastatic bone disease focused on the spine, a combination of upper and lower extremities, or included hematologic malignancy [3], [5], [6], [11] With respect to upper extremity, only the humerus has been studied [3], [12]. In the present study, we excluded hematologic malignancy because it has a different prognosis than bone metastasis from solid malignancies [13]. Bone is the third most common site of metastasis after the lung and liver. The spine, femur, humerus, and pelvis are the most common locations [14]. Metastatic bone disease of the upper extremity alone is rare. Ratasvuori et al. [6] studied skeletal metastasis (excluding the spine) and found the site of metastases occurred less frequently in an upper extremity (24%) than a lower extremity (76%). The most commonly affected upper extremity bone is the humerus. Only rarely are the ulna, scapula, and radius affected [6]. Similarly, in our study two-thirds of cases occurred in the humerus, and far less frequently in the clavicle, scapula, radius, hand, and ulna. Katagiri et al. [15] and Ratasvuori et al. [6] reported skeletal lesions can be the first manifestation of malignancy in 30% and 13.5% of patients, respectively. In our study, 76.5% of patients presented with this condition. This number is high and may be due to the upper extremity being a non-weight bearing bone, such that the pain may not be as explicit as early as in lower extremity. These differences should thus be considered in metastatic bone disease before treatment begins even if no history of cancer has been found. We categorized primary tumors into slow, moderated, and rapid growing, as per Katagiri et al. [10]. Our findings differ from that report as we excluded hematologic malignancy and did not divide breast cancer into hormone-dependent subgroups or lung cancer treated with molecularly targeted drugs vs. not. In the current study from Thailand and the reported by Muramatsu et al. [16] from Japan, the liver was the second most common primary tumor. By contrast, in western countries the primary tumors commonly metastasizing to bone are breast, prostate, kidney, and lung. The liver is not mentioned in western studies [3]; while the prostate is not listed in the current study. In the current study, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) was found as a primary tumor in 3 cases. CCA is a cancer of the biliary system with a poor prognosis, and CCA metastasizing to bone is rare [17]. The incidence of CCA varies worldwide and the highest incidence is in Khon Kaen province Thailand where our institute is located [18], [19]. Bone metastases of unknown origin occur in between 10% and 15% of patients with bone lesions. Adenocarcinoma is the most common histological type; in up to 70% of cases [20], [21]. In the current study, adenocarcinoma of unknown primary tumor was found in 19.6% of cases; notwithstanding a thorough investigation, and all of these cases had a short survival time. The treatment options depended upon the life expectancy of the patient. The estimated survival time was based on Katagiri's score [22]. The choice of treatment was discussed among the physicians, each patient, and their respective family. The appropriate treatment for each case was discussed again in the Musculoskeletal Tumor Board group of Khon Kaen University, Thailand. In general, radiotherapy was indicated for painful metastatic lesion of flat bone (scapula), or painful, inoperable, bone metastasis. Meanwhile, surgical treatment was indicated for pathological fracture of long bones (i.e., of the humerus, radius, and ulna) in patients with a long life expectancy. In the current study, a metastatic lesion in the humeral shaft was treated with tumor curettage and internal fixation, using intramedullary nailing or plating and cementing. Metastases to the humeral head were reconstructed with an endoprosthesis. Metastases to the scapula were treated with radiation alone. Muramatsu et al. [16] described a retrospective study of 20 cases with metastatic bone lesions in an upper extremity; the indications for surgery were pathological fracture, painful bone lesion, and uncontrollable tumor size. The choice of treatment was the same as in our study. In the current study, we found that 80.4% of patients with metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity died with a median survival time of 4.08 months. The respective cumulative 1- and 2-year survival was 15.2% and 10.5%. Wedin et al. [12] reported that in 208 patients with metastatic lesions of the humerus, the respective cumulative survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 40%, 21%, and 16%. Dijkstra et al. [23] reported a series of 37 patients with metastatic lesions of the humeral shaft. The respective survival rate at 3, 6, and 12 months was 61%, 44%, and 16%. We compared the current study to one of patients with metastatic bone disease of the lower extremity. In that study, Schneiderbauer et al. [24] reported that in 299 patients with metastatic hip disease, the respective survival rate was 40%, 21.5%, and 6% at 1, 2, and 5 years. Mavrogenis et al. [25] studied 110 patients with femoral metastases, and the respective survival rate was 54%, 30%, 20%, and 16% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. All of these reports confirm that patients with metastatic bone disease of the lower extremity have better survival than patients with metastatic bone disease of the upper extremity. Further studies should be performed to identify the cause of this difference. Primary tumor was considered the most important prognostic factor for survival in the current study. Rapid growth of the primary tumor group resulted in the shortest survival time (i.e., colon followed by bile duct [CCA]), adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, esophagus, liver, renal, lung, bladder, and cervix). Hansen et al. [3] studied 460 patients with non-spinal skeletal metastases and reported that the negative and positive prognostic factors for survival were lung cancer and myeloma, respectively. The ECOG performance status had risk factor for survival. Patients with a high ECOG score (i.e., 3 or 4) was an indication of poorer general health than patients with a low ECOG score (i.e., 0, 1, or 2). In the current study, we found that patients with a high ECOG score had a shorter survival time than patients with a low ECOG score. Our finding was consistent with studies by Ratasvuori et al. [6], Katagiri et al. [10], and Hill et al. [11]. The study had limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, so some of the data were incomplete and the number of cases was constrained. Second, we only used CT and bone scan to search for visceral and other bone metastases while MRI and PET scan were not available. The number of cases in the visceral and multiple bone metastases groups might have been greater if all of the investigations had been performed. Third, the treatment of metastatic bone disease of an upper extremity varied from conservative to surgical, but this factor was not considered in our study.

Conclusions

Metastatic bone disease of the upper extremity is still a disease with an extremely poor prognosis. Most of the patients present without any history of cancer. The type of primary tumor and ECOG performance status were the important prognostic factors that influenced the overall survival. Our information is useful for the patients, families and doctors to prevent over- or under treatment in patients with metastatic bone disease of the upper extremity.
  25 in total

1.  Complications and survival after surgical treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus.

Authors:  Rikard Wedin; Bjarne H Hansen; Minna Laitinen; Clement Trovik; Olga Zaikova; Peter Bergh; Anders Kalén; Gunnar Schwarz-Lausten; Fredrik Vult von Steyern; Anders Walloe; Johnny Keller; Rüdiger J Weiss
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Humerus pathological fracture revealing biliary carcinoma.

Authors:  K Lahrach; B Chbani; F Amar; A Bennani; A Marzouki; F Boutayeb
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Elisa Pala; Carlo Romagnoli; Matteo Romantini; Teresa Calabro; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Treatment of metastatic bone lesions in the upper extremity: indications for surgery.

Authors:  Keiichi Muramatsu; Koichiro Ihara; Ryuta Iwanagaa; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 5.  Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  R E Coleman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Determining the site of the primary cancer in patients with skeletal metastasis of unknown origin: a retrospective study.

Authors:  H Katagiri; M Takahashi; J Inagaki; H Sugiura; S Ito; H Iwata
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis.

Authors:  H Katagiri; M Takahashi; K Wakai; H Sugiura; T Kataoka; K Nakanishi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-05

8.  Patient survival after hip arthroplasty for metastatic disease of the hip.

Authors:  Michaela M Schneiderbauer; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Franklin H Sim; Sean P Scully
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Register. Survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities.

Authors:  B H Hansen; J Keller; M Laitinen; P Berg; S Skjeldal; C Trovik; J Nilsson; A Walloe; A Kalén; R Wedin
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  2004-04

10.  Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network.

Authors:  Jonathan Agner Forsberg; John Eberhardt; Patrick J Boland; Rikard Wedin; John H Healey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases among Orthopedic Surgeons.

Authors:  Dawid Ciechanowicz; Daniel Kotrych; Filip Dąbrowski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.