Literature DB >> 15292415

Patient survival after hip arthroplasty for metastatic disease of the hip.

Michaela M Schneiderbauer1, Marius von Knoch, Cathy D Schleck, William S Harmsen, Franklin H Sim, Sean P Scully.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hip joint is a common location for metastatic disease. Actual as well as impending fractures at this site are frequently due to mechanical instability after tumor invasion and are usually treated surgically with hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to analyze survival and influences on survival after hip arthroplasty for metastatic hip disease.
METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-nine patients who had undergone a total of 306 hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty procedures for treatment of a pathologic or an impending pathologic hip fracture between 1969 and 1996 at our institution were included in this study. Data that had been acquired prospectively within the total joint registry of our institution were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The median duration of survival after the arthroplasty was 8.6 months. The duration of survival was significantly associated with the site of the fracture, location of the primary tumor, and time from the diagnosis of the primary tumor to the surgery for the fracture (p < or = 0.05). The time from the diagnosis to the arthroplasty was a significant independent predictor of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for metastatic disease have a limited life expectancy, with only 40% (120) of the 299 patients in our series still alive at one year after the surgery. By identifying prognostic factors regarding life expectancy, this study provides surgeons and oncologists with information with which to weigh risks and benefits of hip arthroplasty for individual patients preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15292415     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200408000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  2015 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: Prognostication in Patients With Long Bone Metastases: Does a Boosting Algorithm Improve Survival Estimates?

Authors:  Stein J Janssen; Andrea S van der Heijden; Maarten van Dijke; John E Ready; Kevin A Raskin; Marco L Ferrone; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  Fazel A Khan; Peter S Rose; Michiro Yanagisawa; David G Lewallen; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures: resection vs. stabilisation.

Authors:  Max Zacherl; Gerald Gruber; Mathias Glehr; Petra Ofner-Kopeinig; Roman Radl; Manfred Greitbauer; Vilmos Vecsei; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  How Often Do Acetabular Erosions Occur After Bipolar Hip Endoprostheses in Patients With Malignant Tumors and Are Erosions Associated With Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Peter S Rose; Peter C Ferguson; Franklin H Sim; Anthony M Griffin; Mario Hevesi; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Surgical management of metastatic lesions of the proximal femur with pathological fractures using intramedullary nailing or endoprosthetic replacement.

Authors:  Zeping Yu; Yan Xiong; Rui Shi; Li Min; Wenli Zhang; Hongyuan Liu; Xiang Fang; Chongqi Tu; Hong Duan
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-15

6.  A long femoral stem is not always required in hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur metastases.

Authors:  Zhiqing Xing; Bryan S Moon; Robert L Satcher; Patrick P Lin; Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  National use of total hip arthroplasty among patients with a history of breast, lung, prostate, colon or bladder cancer-an analysis of the Medicare population.

Authors:  Samuel Rosas; Karim Sabeh; Jennifer Kurowicki; Leonard Buller; Tsun Yee Law; Martin Roche; Sheila Conway; Victor H Hernandez
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

8.  Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network.

Authors:  Jonathan Agner Forsberg; John Eberhardt; Patrick J Boland; Rikard Wedin; John H Healey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Safety aspects in surgical treatment of pathological fractures of the proximal femur - modular endoprosthetic replacement vs. intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Johannes Km Fakler; Franziska Hase; Jörg Böhme; Christoph Josten
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-12-07

10.  Comparison of Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants and Harrington Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Acetabulum.

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Peter C Ferguson; Matthew P Abdel; Anthony M Griffin; Mario Hevesi; Kevin I Perry; Peter S Rose; Jay S Wunder; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.