INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the prognosis for the individual patient is important for the choice of surgical treatment of skeletal metastases. In 1999 the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) initiated the Skeletal Metastasis Register as a multicentric, prospective study to provide a scientific basis for treatment recommendations. To improve prognostication we analyzed the survival of patients with skeletal metastases surgically treated at 9 SSG centres. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 460 patients with an average age of 64 years underwent 501 operations for non-spinal skeletal metastases. 7% were operated for more than one metastasis. Carcinoma of the breast, prostate, kidney and lung were the dominating primary tumors. RESULTS: The survival rate was 0.4 at 1 year, 0.3 at 2 years and 0.2 at 3 years. Univariate analysis showed that survival was related to bone localization, skeletal metastatic load, presence of visceral metastases, Karnofsky performance score, primary tumor type, presence of a complete pathological fracture and preoperative hemoglobin content. Multivariate regression analysis showed that pathological fracture, visceral metastases, haemoglobin content < 7 mmol/L and lung cancer were negative prognostic factors for survival. Myeloma was the sole positive prognostic factor for survival.
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the prognosis for the individual patient is important for the choice of surgical treatment of skeletal metastases. In 1999 the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) initiated the Skeletal Metastasis Register as a multicentric, prospective study to provide a scientific basis for treatment recommendations. To improve prognostication we analyzed the survival of patients with skeletal metastases surgically treated at 9 SSG centres. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 460 patients with an average age of 64 years underwent 501 operations for non-spinal skeletal metastases. 7% were operated for more than one metastasis. Carcinoma of the breast, prostate, kidney and lung were the dominating primary tumors. RESULTS: The survival rate was 0.4 at 1 year, 0.3 at 2 years and 0.2 at 3 years. Univariate analysis showed that survival was related to bone localization, skeletal metastatic load, presence of visceral metastases, Karnofsky performance score, primary tumor type, presence of a complete pathological fracture and preoperative hemoglobin content. Multivariate regression analysis showed that pathological fracture, visceral metastases, haemoglobin content < 7 mmol/L and lung cancer were negative prognostic factors for survival. Myeloma was the sole positive prognostic factor for survival.
Authors: Michala Skovlund Sørensen; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Klaus Hindsø; Michael Mørk Petersen Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Franz Liska; Philipp Schmitz; Norbert Harrasser; Peter Prodinger; Hans Rechl; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Jonathan Agner Forsberg; Daniel Sjoberg; Qing-Rong Chen; Andrew Vickers; John H Healey Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jonathan Agner Forsberg; Rikard Wedin; Henrik C F Bauer; Bjarne H Hansen; Minna Laitinen; Clement S Trovik; Johnny Ø Keller; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.430