| Literature DB >> 30591063 |
Xiaowei Zhang1, Zhiwei Zhang1, Yajuan Yang1, Ya Suo1, Ruimeng Liu1, Jiuchun Qiu1, Yungang Zhao2, Ning Jiang2, Changle Liu1, Gary Tse3,4, Guangping Li5, Tong Liu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are increasing evidence that left ventricle diastolic dysfunction is the initial functional alteration in the diabetic myocardium. In this study, we hypothesized that alogliptin prevents diastolic dysfunction and preserves left ventricular mitochondrial function and structure in diabetic rabbits.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic cardiomyopathy; Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; Mitochondrial biogenesis; Mitochondrial function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30591063 PMCID: PMC6307280 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-018-0803-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Representative echocardiographic images of the left ventricle for the three different groups. Two-dimensional echocardiographic image of the control group, diabetic group and alogliptin-treated diabetic group (A–C, top) and Doppler tissue imaging (bottom). LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle; AO aorta, e′ early diastolic mitral annular velocity, a′ late diastolic mitral annular velocity, n = 10 per group
Hemodynamic and echocardiographic studies
| CON group (n = 10) | DM group (n = 10) | DM-A group (n = 10) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 281.4 ± 10.2 | 291.5 ± 11.3 | 279.8 ± 15.0 | 0.145 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 124.38 ± 5.95 | 128.99 ± 5.83 | 128.80 ± 5.49 | 0.217 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.03 ± 4.19 | 81.05 ± 4.72 | 80.6 ± 5.71 | 0.428 |
| MBP (mmHg) | 95.4 ± 4.53 | 97.79 ± 9.93 | 98.55 ± 5.70 | 0.658 |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 2.37 ± 0.57** | 1.07 ± 0.30**## | < 0.001 |
| + dp/dtmax (mmHg/m) | 3969.02 ± 464.27 | 3643.68 ± 332.94 | 3994.28 ± 380.08 | 0.167 |
| − dp/dtmax (mmHg/m) | 2852.58 ± 435.33 | 1475.75 ± 266.74** | 2154.03 ± 391.43**## | < 0.001 |
| LAD (mm) | 6.25 ± 0.90 | 8.94 ± 0.88** | 7.81 ± 0.60**# | < 0.001 |
| IVS (mm) | 1.83 ± 0.31 | 2.75 ± 0.33** | 2.27 ± 0.17*## | < 0.001 |
| PWLV (mm) | 1.71 ± 0.37 | 2.74 ± 0.32** | 2.26 ± 0.19**# | < 0.001 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 11.92 ± 0.72 | 12.82 ± 0.97 | 12.19 ± 0.71 | 0.097 |
| LVESD (mm) | 7.79 ± 0.53 | 7.58 ± 0.57 | 7.97 ± 0.64 | 0.426 |
| LVEF (%) | 56.31 ± 2.50 | 55.94 ± 2.59 | 56.40 ± 1.76 | 0.916 |
| RVEDD (mm) | 4.61 ± 0.71 | 4.98 ± 0.55 | 4.99 ± 0.38 | 0.325 |
| E/e′ ratio | 4.95 ± 1.36 | 11.73 ± 2.85** | 8.89 ± 1.16**# | < 0.001 |
| Heart weight ratio (1/1000) | 2.58 ± 0.19 | 2.82 ± 0.11 | 2.68 ± 0.24 | 0.054 |
| Body weight (kg) | 3.42 ± 0.30 | 2.72 ± 0.75** | 2.95 ± 0.26** | < 0.001 |
Values are mean ± SD
HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end diastolic presssure; + dp/dtmax, maximal increasing rate of left intraventricular pressure; − dp/dtmax, maximal decreasing rate of left intraventricular pressure; LAD, left atrial diameter; IVS, interventricular septal; PWLV, left ventricular posterior wall; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; RVEDD, right ventricular end-diastolic dimension; E/e′: the ratio of early diastolic filling velocity to the early diastolic mitral annulus velocity
* Compared with CON group, P < 0.05
** Compared with CON group, P < 0.01
# Compared with DM group, P < 0.05
## Compared with DM group, P < 0.01
Fig. 2Effects of alogliptin on mitochondrial state 3 respiration rate (a), state 4 respiration rate (b), respiratory control ratio (RCR) (c), mitochondrial membrane potential (d) and ROS levels (e). CON control group, DM: diabetic group, DM-A alogliptin-treated diabetic group. **P < 0.01 versus CON group; #P < 0.05 versus DM group; ##P < 0.01 versus DM group. n = 10 per group
Serum biochemical, oxidative stress and inflammation examination
| CON group (n = 10) | DM group (n = 10) | DM-A group (n = 10) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.98 ± 0.45 | 14.12 ± 1.69** | 11.03 ± 2.01**# | < 0.001 |
| INS (mmol/L) | 17.84 ± 2.57 | 9.06 ± 1.43** | 11.45 ± 1.16**# | < 0.001 |
| GLP-1 (pmol/L) | 1.28 ± 0.35 | 0.42 ± 0.16** | 0.90 ± 0.15*## | < 0.001 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 80.90 ± 15.28 | 92.36 ± 15.07 | 89.31 ± 8.53 | 0.229 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 1.43 ± 0.29 | 1.66 ± 0.34 | 1.73 ± 0.29 | 0.143 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.15 ± 0.23 | 1.21 ± 0.37 | 1.16 ± 0.27 | 0.997 |
| LDLc (mmol/L) | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 0.37 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 0.576 |
| HDLc (mmol/L) | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.47 ± 0.07 | 0.45 ± 0.11 | 0.827 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 476.52 ± 61.76 | 386.28 ± 52.86** | 408.68 ± 28.17* | 0.004 |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 1.49 ± 0.68 | 6.19 ± 1.63** | 3.27 ± 1.04*## | < 0.001 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 9.51 ± 2.00 | 16.62 ± 2.77** | 12.49 ± 2.13## | < 0.001 |
| 8-OHdG (ng/mL) | 1.51 ± 0.50 | 3.79 ± 0.70** | 2.27 ± 0.26*## | < 0.001 |
Values are mean ± SD
INS, insulin; GLP-1, glucagon like peptide-1; Cr, creatinine; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDLc, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDLc, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SOD, superoxide dismutase; hs-CRP, hypertensive C-reactive protein; MDA, malondialdehyde; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine
* Compared with CON group, P < 0.05
** Compared with CON group, P < 0.01
# Compared with DM group, P < 0.05
## Compared with DM group, P < 0.01
Fig. 3Left ventricular interstitial fibrosis in the control group, diabetic group and alogliptin-treated diabetic group (A–C). Area of fibrosis to the area of the reference tissue (D). **Compared with CON group, P < 0.01; ##Compared with DM group, P < 0.01. n = 6 per group
Fig. 4Comparison of left ventricular ultrastructure in the control group, diabetic group and alogliptin-treated diabetic group (A–C). n = 4 per group
Fig. 5TGFβ1 (a) and NF-κB p65 protein (b) expression in left ventricular tissue by Western blot analysis. **P < 0.01 versus CON group; ##P < 0.01 versus DM group. n = 3 to 6 per group
Fig. 6Protein expression levels of mitochondrial biogenesis-related proteins in left ventricular tissue estimated by Western blot analysis. a–c PGC-1α, NRF-1, and Tfam protein levels. **P < 0.01 versus CON group; #P < 0.05 versus DM group; ##P < 0.01 versus DM group. n = 3 to 6 per group