Kumar Sharma1. 1. Center for Renal Translational Medicine, Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, and Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Veterans Medical Research Foundation, San Diego, CA kumarsharma@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
The concept that excess superoxide production from mitochondria is the driving, initial cellular response underlying diabetes complications has been held for the past decade. However, results of antioxidant-based trials have been largely negative. In the present review, the data supporting mitochondrial superoxide as a driving force for diabetic kidney, nerve, heart, and retinal complications are reexamined, and a new concept for diabetes complications--mitochondrial hormesis--is presented. In this view, production of mitochondrial superoxide can be an indicator of healthy mitochondria and physiologic oxidative phosphorylation. Recent data suggest that in response to excess glucose exposure or nutrient stress, there is a reduction of mitochondrial superoxide, oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial ATP generation in several target tissues of diabetes complications. Persistent reduction of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complex activity is associated with the release of oxidants from nonmitochondrial sources and release of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines, and a manifestation of organ dysfunction. Restoration of mitochondrial function and superoxide production via activation of AMPK has now been associated with improvement in markers of renal, cardiovascular, and neuronal dysfunction with diabetes. With this Perspective, approaches that stimulate AMPK and PGC1α via exercise, caloric restriction, and medications result in stimulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation activity, restore physiologic mitochondrial superoxide production, and promote organ healing.
The concept that excess superoxide production from mitochondria is the driving, initial cellular response underlying diabetes complications has been held for the past decade. However, results of antioxidant-based trials have been largely negative. In the present review, the data supporting mitochondrial superoxide as a driving force for diabetic kidney, nerve, heart, and retinal complications are reexamined, and a new concept for diabetes complications--mitochondrial hormesis--is presented. In this view, production of mitochondrial superoxide can be an indicator of healthy mitochondria and physiologic oxidative phosphorylation. Recent data suggest that in response to excess glucose exposure or nutrient stress, there is a reduction of mitochondrial superoxide, oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial ATP generation in several target tissues of diabetes complications. Persistent reduction of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complex activity is associated with the release of oxidants from nonmitochondrial sources and release of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines, and a manifestation of organ dysfunction. Restoration of mitochondrial function and superoxide production via activation of AMPK has now been associated with improvement in markers of renal, cardiovascular, and neuronal dysfunction with diabetes. With this Perspective, approaches that stimulate AMPK and PGC1α via exercise, caloric restriction, and medications result in stimulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation activity, restore physiologic mitochondrial superoxide production, and promote organ healing.
Authors: Sihem Boudina; Sandra Sena; Brian T O'Neill; Prakash Tathireddy; Martin E Young; E Dale Abel Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-10-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kevin Jon Williams; Gang Qiu; Hitomi Katoaka Usui; Stephen R Dunn; Peter McCue; Erwin Bottinger; Renato V Iozzo; Kumar Sharma Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Delyth Graham; Ngan N Huynh; Carlene A Hamilton; Elisabeth Beattie; Robin A J Smith; Helena M Cochemé; Michael P Murphy; Anna F Dominiczak Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Simon A Hawley; Morgan D Fullerton; Fiona A Ross; Jonathan D Schertzer; Cyrille Chevtzoff; Katherine J Walker; Mark W Peggie; Darya Zibrova; Kevin A Green; Kirsty J Mustard; Bruce E Kemp; Kei Sakamoto; Gregory R Steinberg; D Grahame Hardie Journal: Science Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Xiaoxin X Wang; Dong Wang; Yuhuan Luo; Komuraiah Myakala; Evgenia Dobrinskikh; Avi Z Rosenberg; Jonathan Levi; Jeffrey B Kopp; Amanda Field; Ashley Hill; Scott Lucia; Liru Qiu; Tao Jiang; Yingqiong Peng; David Orlicky; Gabriel Garcia; Michal Herman-Edelstein; Vivette D'Agati; Kammi Henriksen; Luciano Adorini; Mark Pruzanski; Cen Xie; Kristopher W Krausz; Frank J Gonzalez; Suman Ranjit; Alexander Dvornikov; Enrico Gratton; Moshe Levi Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Petr Ježek; Blanka Holendová; Martin Jabůrek; Jan Tauber; Andrea Dlasková; Lydie Plecitá-Hlavatá Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2021-01-29
Authors: Weier Qi; Hillary A Keenan; Qian Li; Atsushi Ishikado; Aimo Kannt; Thorsten Sadowski; Mark A Yorek; I-Hsien Wu; Samuel Lockhart; Lawrence J Coppey; Anja Pfenninger; Chong Wee Liew; Guifen Qiang; Alison M Burkart; Stephanie Hastings; David Pober; Christopher Cahill; Monika A Niewczas; William J Israelsen; Liane Tinsley; Isaac E Stillman; Peter S Amenta; Edward P Feener; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Robert C Stanton; George L King Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Amy E Rumora; Stephen I Lentz; Lucy M Hinder; Samuel W Jackson; Andrew Valesano; Gideon E Levinson; Eva L Feldman Journal: FASEB J Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 5.191