Literature DB >> 30590793

R-loop formation by dCas9 is mutagenic in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Marian F Laughery1, Hannah C Mayes1, Ivan K Pedroza1, John J Wyrick1,2.   

Abstract

Cas9 binds and cleaves specific DNA sequences by inducing the formation of an R-loop between the guide RNA and its genomic target. While targeting of active Cas9 to a genomic locus is highly mutagenic because Cas9 creates DNA double strand breaks, targeting of dead Cas9 (dCas9) is presumed not to be mutagenic, as dCas9 lacks DNA endonuclease activity. Here, we show that dCas9 targeting induces mutations in yeast, particularly when targeted to the non-transcribed strand of a gene. dCas9-induced mutations cluster near the guide RNA target region and are comprised of single nucleotide substitutions, small insertions and deletions, and even complex mutations, depending upon the particular guide RNA target. We show that many of these mutations are a consequence of cytosine deamination events occurring on the non-target strand of the dCas9-induced R-loop, while others are associated with homopolymer instability or translesion DNA synthesis. Targeting of dCas9 by a mismatch-containing guide RNA also increases CAN1 mutation frequency, particularly in an ung1Δ mutant strain, suggesting that dCas9 induces mutations through similar mechanisms at off-target sites. These findings indicate that DNA binding by dCas9 is mutagenic in yeast, likely because dCas9 induces the formation of an R-loop at its target site.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30590793      PMCID: PMC6411842          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  52 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication fidelity.

Authors:  T A Kunkel; K Bebenek
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Mechanism of a genetic glissando: structural biology of indel mutations.

Authors:  Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Correlation between transcription and C to T mutations in the non-transcribed DNA strand.

Authors:  A Beletskii; A S Bhagwat
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.915

4.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Xuebing Wu; David A Scott; Andrea J Kriz; Anthony C Chiu; Patrick D Hsu; Daniel B Dadon; Albert W Cheng; Alexandro E Trevino; Silvana Konermann; Sidi Chen; Rudolf Jaenisch; Feng Zhang; Phillip A Sharp
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Avoidance of APOBEC3B-induced mutation by error-free lesion bypass.

Authors:  James I Hoopes; Amber L Hughes; Lauren A Hobson; Luis M Cortez; Alexander J Brown; Steven A Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Histone Sprocket Arginine Residues Are Important for Gene Expression, DNA Repair, and Cell Viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amelia J Hodges; Isaura J Gallegos; Marian F Laughery; Rithy Meas; Linh Tran; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering.

Authors:  Patrick D Hsu; Eric S Lander; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Frameshift intermediates in homopolymer runs are removed efficiently by yeast mismatch repair proteins.

Authors:  C N Greene; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Hypermutability of homonucleotide runs in mismatch repair and DNA polymerase proofreading yeast mutants.

Authors:  H T Tran; J D Keen; M Kricker; M A Resnick; D A Gordenin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; John Aach; P Benjamin Stranges; Kevin M Esvelt; Mark Moosburner; Sriram Kosuri; Luhan Yang; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  10 in total

1.  dCas9 binding inhibits the initiation of base excision repair in vitro.

Authors:  Jacob S Antony; Steven A Roberts; John J Wyrick; John M Hinz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 2.  Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jacob S Antony; John M Hinz; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 3.  Zooming in on chromosome dynamics.

Authors:  John K Eykelenboom; Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Engineered Chromatin Remodeling Proteins for Precise Nucleosome Positioning.

Authors:  Drake A Donovan; Johnathan G Crandall; Orion G B Banks; Zena D Jensvold; Vi Truong; Devin Dinwiddie; Laura E McKnight; Jeffrey N McKnight
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Point mutations in topoisomerase I alter the mutation spectrum in E. coli and impact the emergence of drug resistance genotypes.

Authors:  Amit Bachar; Elad Itzhaki; Shmuel Gleizer; Melina Shamshoom; Ron Milo; Niv Antonovsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Targeted epigenetic repression by CRISPR/dSaCas9 suppresses pathogenic DUX4-fl expression in FSHD.

Authors:  Charis L Himeda; Takako I Jones; Peter L Jones
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 6.698

7.  Systematic decomposition of sequence determinants governing CRISPR/Cas9 specificity.

Authors:  Rongjie Fu; Wei He; Jinzhuang Dou; Oscar D Villarreal; Ella Bedford; Helen Wang; Connie Hou; Liang Zhang; Yalong Wang; Dacheng Ma; Yiwen Chen; Xue Gao; Martin Depken; Han Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  DNA nicks induce mutational signatures associated with BRCA1 deficiency.

Authors:  Yi-Li Feng; Qian Liu; Ruo-Dan Chen; Si-Cheng Liu; Zhi-Cheng Huang; Kun-Ming Liu; Xiao-Ying Yang; An-Yong Xie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Replisome bypass of a protein-based R-loop block by Pif1.

Authors:  Grant D Schauer; Lisanne M Spenkelink; Jacob S Lewis; Olga Yurieva; Stefan H Mueller; Antoine M van Oijen; Michael E O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Atypical UV Photoproducts Induce Non-canonical Mutation Classes Associated with Driver Mutations in Melanoma.

Authors:  Marian F Laughery; Alexander J Brown; Kaitlynne A Bohm; Smitha Sivapragasam; Haley S Morris; Mila Tchmola; Angelica D Washington; Debra Mitchell; Stephen Mather; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Steven A Roberts; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 9.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.