Julia Schechter1, Elizabeth K Do2, Junfeng Jim Zhang3, Cathrine Hoyo4, Susan K Murphy5, Scott H Kollins1, Bernard Fuemmeler2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 2. Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 3. Nicholas School of the Environment and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC. 4. Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Both prenatal smoke exposure and depression have been linked to lower birth weight, a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Few studies have looked at the interaction between these risk factors and none have used a biomarker to objectively measure prenatal smoke exposure. The current study sought to examine independent and interactive effects of cotinine and depression on birth weight. The effect of race was also explored. METHOD: Data were drawn from a prospective study of pregnant women (N = 568) in the southeastern United States. Maternal demographic, health information, depressive symptoms, and birth data were collected via self-report and medical record abstraction. Prenatal blood samples were assayed for cotinine. RESULTS: Controlling for covariates, multiple regression analyses indicated that both cotinine and depressive symptoms independently predicted lower birth weight and a significant interaction was also observed. Upon probing the interaction, a negative association between cotinine levels and birth weight was found in the context of higher depression but not lower depression scores. Similarly, logistic regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between cotinine and depression, such that cotinine predicted having a baby less than 2500 g among women who fell above the indicated cutoff score. African American women had the highest levels of cotinine and lowest weight babies; however, race was not a significant moderator. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest prenatal smoke exposure has a greater negative effect on birth weight for women endorsing co-occurring depressive symptoms. Findings can inform targeted interventions and assist medical providers with identifying women at increased risk for poor perinatal outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the common occurrence of smoking during pregnancy and prenatal depression, the interaction between these risk factors on birth weight has rarely been examined. Further, the extant results have been mixed, likely due in part to difficulties in measurement. The current study was the first to use prenatal cotinine to assess bias-free, continuous levels of prenatal smoke exposure. Results indicate that prenatal cotinine was a significant predictor of birth weight only in the context of maternal depressive symptoms. These findings have important implications for mitigating negative perinatal outcomes for pregnant women and their children.
INTRODUCTION: Both prenatal smoke exposure and depression have been linked to lower birth weight, a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Few studies have looked at the interaction between these risk factors and none have used a biomarker to objectively measure prenatal smoke exposure. The current study sought to examine independent and interactive effects of cotinine and depression on birth weight. The effect of race was also explored. METHOD: Data were drawn from a prospective study of pregnant women (N = 568) in the southeastern United States. Maternal demographic, health information, depressive symptoms, and birth data were collected via self-report and medical record abstraction. Prenatal blood samples were assayed for cotinine. RESULTS: Controlling for covariates, multiple regression analyses indicated that both cotinine and depressive symptoms independently predicted lower birth weight and a significant interaction was also observed. Upon probing the interaction, a negative association between cotinine levels and birth weight was found in the context of higher depression but not lower depression scores. Similarly, logistic regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between cotinine and depression, such that cotinine predicted having a baby less than 2500 g among women who fell above the indicated cutoff score. African American women had the highest levels of cotinine and lowest weight babies; however, race was not a significant moderator. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest prenatal smoke exposure has a greater negative effect on birth weight for women endorsing co-occurring depressive symptoms. Findings can inform targeted interventions and assist medical providers with identifying women at increased risk for poor perinatal outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the common occurrence of smoking during pregnancy and prenatal depression, the interaction between these risk factors on birth weight has rarely been examined. Further, the extant results have been mixed, likely due in part to difficulties in measurement. The current study was the first to use prenatal cotinine to assess bias-free, continuous levels of prenatal smoke exposure. Results indicate that prenatal cotinine was a significant predictor of birth weight only in the context of maternal depressive symptoms. These findings have important implications for mitigating negative perinatal outcomes for pregnant women and their children.
Authors: Sylvia Tan; Lauren P Courtney; Ayman A E El-Mohandes; Marie G Gantz; Susan M Blake; Jutta Thornberry; M Nabil El-Khorazaty; David Perry; Michele Kiely Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2011-12
Authors: Van T Tong; Patricia M Dietz; Italia V Rolle; Sara M Kennedy; William Thomas; Lucinda J England Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Ying Liu; Susan K Murphy; Amy P Murtha; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Joellen Schildkraut; Zhiqing Huang; Francine Overcash; Joanne Kurtzberg; Randy Jirtle; Edwin S Iversen; Michele R Forman; Cathrine Hoyo Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: David C Wheeler; Joseph Boyle; D Jeremy Barsell; Rachel L Maguire; Bassam Dahman; Susan K Murphy; Cathrine Hoyo; Jim Zhang; Jason A Oliver; Joseph McClernon; Bernard F Fuemmeler Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2022-02-18
Authors: Beatriz Pereira; Bárbara Figueiredo; Tiago Miguel Pinto; M Carmen Míguez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 3.390