Literature DB >> 17666608

Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Jeannette R Ickovics1, Trace S Kershaw, Claire Westdahl, Urania Magriples, Zohar Massey, Heather Reynolds, Sharon Schindler Rising.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether group prenatal care improves pregnancy outcomes, psychosocial function, and patient satisfaction and to examine potential cost differences.
METHODS: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted at two university-affiliated hospital prenatal clinics. Pregnant women aged 14-25 years (n=1,047) were randomly assigned to either standard or group care. Women with medical conditions requiring individualized care were excluded from randomization. Group participants received care in a group setting with women having the same expected delivery month. Timing and content of visits followed obstetric guidelines from week 18 through delivery. Each 2-hour prenatal care session included physical assessment, education and skills building, and support through facilitated group discussion. Structured interviews were conducted at study entry, during the third trimester, and postpartum.
RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 20.4 years; 80% were African American. Using intent-to-treat analyses, women assigned to group care were significantly less likely to have preterm births compared with those in standard care: 9.8% compared with 13.8%, with no differences in age, parity, education, or income between study conditions. This is equivalent to a risk reduction of 33% (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.99, P=.045), or 40 per 1,000 births. Effects were strengthened for African-American women: 10.0% compared with 15.8% (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.92, P=.02). Women in group sessions were less likely to have suboptimal prenatal care (P<.01), had significantly better prenatal knowledge (P<.001), felt more ready for labor and delivery (P<.001), and had greater satisfaction with care (P<.001). Breastfeeding initiation was higher in group care: 66.5% compared with 54.6%, P<.001. There were no differences in birth weight nor in costs associated with prenatal care or delivery.
CONCLUSION: Group prenatal care resulted in equal or improved perinatal outcomes at no added cost. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00271960 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17666608      PMCID: PMC2276878          DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  25 in total

1.  Prematurity--a window of opportunity?

Authors:  Mark A Sperling
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Stress and preterm birth.

Authors:  Calvin J Hobel
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Research agenda for preterm birth: recommendations from the March of Dimes.

Authors:  Nancy S Green; Karla Damus; Joe Leigh Simpson; Jay Iams; E Albert Reece; Calvin J Hobel; Irwin R Merkatz; Michael F Greene; Richard H Schwarz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The association between pregnancy processes, preterm delivery, low birth weight, and postpartum depressions--the need for interdisciplinary integration.

Authors:  Uriel Halbreich
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002.

Authors:  Michael J Davidoff; Todd Dias; Karla Damus; Rebecca Russell; Vani R Bettegowda; Siobhan Dolan; Richard H Schwarz; Nancy S Green; Joann Petrini
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Risk factors for neonatal morbidity and mortality among "healthy," late preterm newborns.

Authors:  Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Kay M Tomashek; Milton Kotelchuck; Wanda Barfield; Judith Weiss; Stephen Evans
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.300

7.  Centering pregnancy. An interdisciplinary model of empowerment.

Authors:  S S Rising
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

8.  A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight.

Authors:  H C Heins; N W Nance; B J McCarthy; C M Efird
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Use of computer interview data to test associations between risk factors and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  J C'de Baca; S C Lapham; B J Skipper; M L Watkins
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1997-06

10.  Premature birth and later insulin resistance.

Authors:  Paul L Hofman; Fiona Regan; Wendy E Jackson; Craig Jefferies; David B Knight; Elizabeth M Robinson; Wayne S Cutfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  197 in total

1.  An integrated randomized intervention to reduce behavioral and psychosocial risks: pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Siva Subramanian; Kathy S Katz; Margaret Rodan; Marie G Gantz; Nabil M El-Khorazaty; Allan Johnson; Jill Joseph
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  A review of prenatal group care literature: the need for a structured theoretical framework and systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Jeanelle Sheeder; Kim Weber Yorga; Karolyn Kabir-Greher
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

3.  The intersection of everyday life and group prenatal care for women in two urban clinics.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Lois S Sadler; Kathleen A Knafl; Nora Ellen Groce; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

4.  Inadequate prenatal care use among Canadian mothers: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.

Authors:  Y Debessai; C Costanian; M Roy; M El-Sayed; H Tamim
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Clinician-Reported Barriers to Group Visit Implementation.

Authors:  Beth A Careyva; Melanie B Johnson; Samantha A Goodrich; Kyle Shaak; Brian Stello
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-02-16

6.  Exploring the group prenatal care model: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kathleen Thielen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

7.  Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Age: Exploring Intersections in Preterm Birth Disparities among Teen Mothers.

Authors:  Sheryl L Coley; Tracy R Nichols; Kelly L Rulison; Robert E Aronson; Shelly L Brown-Jeffy; Sharon D Morrison
Journal:  Int J Popul Res       Date:  2015

8.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

9.  Maternal socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with transcriptional indications of greater immune activation and slower tissue maturation in placental biopsies and newborn cord blood.

Authors:  Gregory E Miller; Ann E Borders; Amy H Crockett; Kharah M Ross; Sameen Qadir; Lauren Keenan-Devlin; Adam K Leigh; Paula Ham; Jeffrey Ma; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Linda M Ernst; Steve W Cole
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 7.217

10.  Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.

Authors:  Sarah Benatar; A Bowen Garrett; Embry Howell; Ashley Palmer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.