UNLABELLED: This study sought to examine relationships between depressive symptoms and prenatal smoking and/or household environmental tobacco smoke exposure (HH-ETSE) among urban minority women. We analyzed private, audio computer-assisted self interview data from a clinic-based sample of 929 minority pregnant women in Washington, DC. Depressive symptoms were assessed via the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen. HH-ETSE, current smoking, and former smoking were assessed via self-report. Depression levels and demographic characteristics were compared: (1) among nonsmokers, for those reporting HH-ETSE versus no HH-ETSE; and (2) among smokers, for those reporting current smoking (in last 7 days) versus former smokers. Measures associated with HH-ETSE/current smoking in bivariate analysis at P < 0.20 were included in adjusted logistic regression models. HH-ETSE, as a possible indicator of a social smoking network, was assessed as a mediator for the relationship between depression and current smoking. RESULTS: Non-smokers reporting moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms showed significantly higher adjusted odds of prenatal HH-ETSE (AOR 2.5, 95% CI [1.2, 5.2]). Smokers reporting moderate-to-severe or mild depressive symptoms showed significantly higher adjusted odds of current smoking (AOR 1.9, 95% CI [1.1, 3.5] and AOR 1.8, 95% CI [1.1, 3.1], respectively). Among smokers, HH-ETSE was a significant mediator for the association between moderate-to-severe symptoms and current smoking. In conclusion, health care providers should be aware that depressed urban minority women are at risk of continued smoking/HH-ETSE during pregnancy. Interventions designed to encourage behavior change should include screening for depression, and build skills so that women are better able to address the social environment.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: This study sought to examine relationships between depressive symptoms and prenatal smoking and/or household environmental tobacco smoke exposure (HH-ETSE) among urban minority women. We analyzed private, audio computer-assisted self interview data from a clinic-based sample of 929 minority pregnant women in Washington, DC. Depressive symptoms were assessed via the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen. HH-ETSE, current smoking, and former smoking were assessed via self-report. Depression levels and demographic characteristics were compared: (1) among nonsmokers, for those reporting HH-ETSE versus no HH-ETSE; and (2) among smokers, for those reporting current smoking (in last 7 days) versus former smokers. Measures associated with HH-ETSE/current smoking in bivariate analysis at P < 0.20 were included in adjusted logistic regression models. HH-ETSE, as a possible indicator of a social smoking network, was assessed as a mediator for the relationship between depression and current smoking. RESULTS: Non-smokers reporting moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms showed significantly higher adjusted odds of prenatal HH-ETSE (AOR 2.5, 95% CI [1.2, 5.2]). Smokers reporting moderate-to-severe or mild depressive symptoms showed significantly higher adjusted odds of current smoking (AOR 1.9, 95% CI [1.1, 3.5] and AOR 1.8, 95% CI [1.1, 3.1], respectively). Among smokers, HH-ETSE was a significant mediator for the association between moderate-to-severe symptoms and current smoking. In conclusion, health care providers should be aware that depressed urban minority women are at risk of continued smoking/HH-ETSE during pregnancy. Interventions designed to encourage behavior change should include screening for depression, and build skills so that women are better able to address the social environment.
Authors: Frank C Bandiera; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kristopher L Arheart; Evelyn P Davila; Lora E Fleming; Noella A Dietz; John E Lewis; David Fabry; David J Lee Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2010-05
Authors: D S Metzger; B Koblin; C Turner; H Navaline; F Valenti; S Holte; M Gross; A Sheon; H Miller; P Cooley; G R Seage Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-07-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ayman A E El-Mohandes; Michele Kiely; Susan M Blake; Marie G Gantz; M Nabil El-Khorazaty Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Martin Kharrazi; Gerald N DeLorenze; Farla L Kaufman; Brenda Eskenazi; John T Bernert; Steve Graham; Michelle Pearl; James Pirkle Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Theresa E Perlis; Don C Des Jarlais; Samuel R Friedman; Kamyar Arasteh; Charles F Turner Journal: Addiction Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Julia Schechter; Elizabeth K Do; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Cathrine Hoyo; Susan K Murphy; Scott H Kollins; Bernard Fuemmeler Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Renee D Goodwin; Keely Cheslack-Postava; Deborah B Nelson; Philip H Smith; Deborah S Hasin; Teresa Janevic; Nina Bakoyiannis; Melanie M Wall Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Julia C Schechter; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Cathrine Hoyo; Susan K Murphy; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Scott H Kollins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Catherine Chamberlain; Alison O'Mara-Eves; Sandy Oliver; Jenny R Caird; Susan M Perlen; Sandra J Eades; James Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-10-23
Authors: Jingya Huang; Bin Xu; Dan Guo; Ting Jiang; Wei Huang; Guocong Liu; Xiaohua Ye Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390