Literature DB >> 3058874

Quality of life in stage II breast cancer: an instrument for clinical trials.

M N Levine1, G H Guyatt, M Gent, S De Pauw, M D Goodyear, W M Hryniuk, A Arnold, B Findlay, J R Skillings, V H Bramwell.   

Abstract

A questionnaire has been developed for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with stage II breast cancer. The selection of items for this Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) was based on the problems and experiences felt to be most important by women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. The BCQ consists of 30 questions that focus on loss of attractiveness, fatigue, physical symptoms, inconvenience, emotional distress, and feelings of hope and support from others. The BCQ, other instruments that evaluate quality-of-life (Spitzer, Karnofsky, and Rand), and patient and physician global assessments were administered serially to 418 patients taking part in a randomized trial comparing a 12-week regimen and a 36-week regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy. The validity of the BCQ is supported by its correlation with the Rand Emotional (r = .58), Rand Physical (r = .60), and Spitzer (r = .62) questionnaires. The BCQ correlated more strongly with global ratings of both physical and emotional function by the patients and their physicians than the other instruments. A comparison of the quality-of-life outcomes of patients in the two treatment groups in the period beyond 3 months after initiation of treatment, when one group had completed the treatment course and the other was still on treatment, revealed that the BCQ and Karnofsky were the only instruments able to demonstrate differences between the groups (P less than .0001). Hence, the BCQ is a valid and responsive method of assessing treatment-related morbidity in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3058874     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.12.1798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  42 in total

1.  Analysis of Factors Associated with Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients after Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; R S Epstein; P J Ferrie; R Jaeschke; T K Hiller
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Breast cancer: clinical decision making.

Authors:  J D Hayes; E J Clark
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  [Risks of unfavorable cosmetic and toxicity after percutaneous accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Interim analysis from the Canadian RAPID trial].

Authors:  M D Piroth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  [Arrhythmias].

Authors:  Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.840

8.  Therapy choices and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors: a short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Marie Catherine Lee; Rajendra S Bhati; Edina E von Rottenthaler; Angela M Reagan; Sloan B Karver; Richard R Reich; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23).

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Sung Heui Bae; Im Ok Kang; Kyung Hwan Shin; Ran Lee; So Im Kwon; Young Suk Park; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and Fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel versus Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Margot Burnell; Mark N Levine; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Vivien Bramwell; Karen Gelmon; Barbara Walley; Ted Vandenberg; Haji Chalchal; Kathy S Albain; Edith A Perez; Hope Rugo; Kathleen Pritchard; Patti O'Brien; Lois E Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.