| Literature DB >> 30586918 |
Enoch Osei1, Samuel Kwain2, Gilbert Tetevi Mawuli3, Abraham Kwabena Anang4, Kofi Baffour-Awuah Owusu5, Mustafa Camas6, Anil Sazak Camas7, Mitsuko Ohashi8, Cristina-Nicoleta Alexandru-Crivac9, Hai Deng10, Marcel Jaspars11, Kwaku Kyeremeh12.
Abstract
A new alkaloid paenidigyamycin A (1) was obtained from the novel Ghanaian Paenibacillus sp. isolated from the mangrove rhizosphere soils of the Pterocarpus santalinoides tree growing in the wetlands of the Digya National Park, Ghana. Compound 1 was isolated on HPLC at tR = 37.0 min and its structure determined by MS, 1D, and 2D-NMR data. When tested against L. major, 1 (IC50 0.75 µM) was just as effective as amphotericin B (IC50 0.31 µM). Against L. donovani, 1 (IC50 7.02 µM) was twenty-two times less active than amphotericin B (IC50 0.32 µM), reinforcing the unique effectiveness of 1 against L. major. For T. brucei brucei, 1 (IC50 0.78 µM) was ten times more active than the laboratory standard Coptis japonica (IC50 8.20 µM). The IC50 of 9.08 µM for 1 against P. falciparum 3d7 compared to artesunate (IC50 36 nM) was not strong, but this result suggests the possibility of using the paenidigyamycin scaffold for the development of potent antimalarial drugs. Against cercariae, 1 showed high anticercaricidal activity compared to artesunate. The minimal lethal concentration (MLC) and minimal effective concentration (MEC) of the compound were 25 and 6.25 µM, respectively, while artesunate was needed in higher quantities to produce such results. However, 1 (IC50 > 100 µM) was not active against T. mobilensis.Entities:
Keywords: leishmania; paenidigyamycin; plasmodium; schistosome; trichomonas; trypanosome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30586918 PMCID: PMC6356793 DOI: 10.3390/md17010009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structure of the imidazole-based alkaloid paenidigyamycin A (1) isolated from Paenibacillus sp. DE2SH.
Figure 2Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships between strain DE2SH and other representative members of species of the genus Paenibacillus. Bacillus subtilis AJ276351T was used as an out-group. Asterisks (*) indicate branches that were also found using the maximum-parsimony [28] and maximum-likelihood methods [26]. Numbers at branch points indicate bootstrap percentages (based on 1000 replicates); only values >50 % are indicated. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 3Key COSY (bold lines) and 13C-1H HMBC (arrows) correlations for compound 1.
Figure 4Key TOCSY (bold lines) and ROESY (double arrow) correlations for compound 1.
1D and HMBC NMR Spectroscopic Data for Paenidigyamycin A (1) in CD3OD, in ppm.
| # | δC mult | δH mult ( | HMBC | # | δC mult | δH mult ( | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-N | 1′-N | ||||||
| 2 | 135.4, C | 8, 10 | 2′ | 135.5, C | 8′, 10′ | ||
| 3-N | 3′-N | ||||||
| 4 | 128.4, C | 10, 6 | 4′ | 128.5, C | 10′, 6′ | ||
| 5 | 128.4, C | 8, 7 | 5′ | 128.5, C | 8′, 7′ | ||
| 6 | 8.1, CH3 | 2.27, s | 6′ | 8.2, CH3 | 2.31, s | ||
| 7 | 8.1, CH3 | 2.22, s | 7′ | 8.0, CH3 | 2.06, s | ||
| 8 | 49.7, CH2 | 4.40, t (6.8) | 9 | 8′ | 49.2, CH2 | 4.33, t (6.9) | 9′ |
| 9 | 36.7, CH2 | 3.12, t (6.7) | 8, 2′, 6′ | 9′ | 37.1, CH2 | 3.04, t (6.9) | 8′ |
| 10 | 46.4, CH2 | 4.03, m | 12, 11 | 10′ | 46.6, CH2 | 4.13, m | 12′, 11′ |
| 11 | 39.5, CH2 | 1.57, m | 13, 14, 10, 12 | 11′ | 39.5, CH2 | 1.73, m | 13′, 14′, 12′, 10′ |
| 12 | 26.5, CH | 1.48, n (6.8) | 13, 14, 10 | 12′ | 26.9, CH | 1.67, n (6.8) | 13′, 14′, 11′, 10′ |
| 13 | 22.5, CH3 | 0.96, d (6.6) | 14 | 13′ | 22.5, CH3 | 1.02, d (6.5) | 14′ |
| 14 | 22.5, CH3 | 0.96, d (6.6) | 13 | 14′ | 22.5, CH3 | 1.02, d (6.5) | 13′ |
| 1′ | 137.8, C | 9, 8, 3′, 5′ | 1″ | 137.8, C | 3″, 5″, 9′, 8′ | ||
| 2′ | 130.0, CH | 7.10, m | 9, 4′, 3′, 5′ | 2″ | 130.0, CH | 7.10, m | 4″, 3″, 5″, 9′ |
| 3′ | 130.0, CH | 7.31, m | 2′, 6′ | 3″ | 130.0, CH | 7.31, m | 2″, 6″ |
| 4′ | 128.4, CH | 7.29, m | 2′, 6′ | 4″ | 128.4, CH | 7.29, m | 2″, 6″ |
| 5′ | 130.0, CH | 7.31, m | 2′, 6′ | 5″ | 130.0, CH | 7.31, m | 2″, 6″, |
| 6′ | 130.0, CH | 7.10, m | 9, 4′, 3′, 5′ | 6″ | 130.0, CH | 7.10, m | 4″, 3″, 5″, 9′ |
Antibacterial bioactivity data of compound 1 with ampicillin as the positive control.
| Compound (1) | Microbe | IC50 (µM) | Positive Control | IC50 (µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paenidigyamycin A |
| 76.98 | Ampicillin | 10.44 |
|
| 11.87 | Ampicillin | 0.18 | |
|
| 97.23 | Ampicillin | 1.70 | |
|
| 56.98 | Ampicillin | 1.76 | |
|
| 57.98 | Ampicillin | 1.53 | |
|
| 18.98 | Ampicillin | 2.71 |
Antiparasitic bioactivity data for compound 1.
| Compound (1) | Parasite | IC50 (µM) | Positive Control | IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paenidigyamycin A | 9.08 | Artesunate | 36 nm | |
|
| 0.78 |
| 8.20 µM | |
|
| 7.02 | Amphotericin B | 0.32 µM | |
|
| 0.75 | Amphotericin B | 0.31 µM |
In-vitro susceptibility results for Trichomonas mobilensis.
| Compound (1) | Parasite | IC50 (µM) | Positive Control | IC50 (µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paenidigyamycin A |
| > 100 | Metronidazole | 5.2 |
Scheme 1A Proposed Model for the Biosynthesis of Paenidigyamycin A (1).