Literature DB >> 30586824

Exploring variability in environmental impact risk from human activities across aquatic ecosystems.

Florian Borgwardt1, Leonie Robinson2, Daniel Trauner3, Heliana Teixeira4, Antonio J A Nogueira4, Ana I Lillebø4, Gerjan Piet5, Mathias Kuemmerlen6, Tim O'Higgins7, Hugh McDonald8, Juan Arevalo-Torres9, Ana Luisa Barbosa9, Alejandro Iglesias-Campos9, Thomas Hein3, Fiona Culhane2.   

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems are under severe pressure. Human activities introduce an array of pressures that impact ecosystems and their components. In this study we focus on the aquatic domains of fresh, coastal and marine waters, including rivers, lakes and riparian habitats to transitional, coastal as well as shelf and oceanic habitats. In an environmental risk assessment approach, we identified impact chains that link 45 human activities through 31 pressures to 82 ecosystem components. In this linkage framework >22,000 activity-pressure-ecosystem component interactions were found across seven European case studies. We identified the environmental impact risk posed by each impact chain by first categorically weighting the interactions according to five criteria: spatial extent, dispersal potential, frequency of interaction, persistence of pressure and severity of the interaction, where extent, dispersal, frequency and persistence account for the exposure to risk (spatial and temporal), and the severity accounts for the consequence of the risk. After assigning a numerical score to each risk criterion, we came up with an overall environmental impact risk score for each impact chain. This risk score was analysed in terms of (1) the activities and pressures that introduce the greatest risk to European aquatic domains, and (2) the aquatic ecosystem components and realms that are at greatest risk from human activities. Activities related to energy production were relevant across the aquatic domains. Fishing was highly relevant in marine and environmental engineering in fresh waters. Chemical and physical pressures introduced the greatest risk to the aquatic realms. Ecosystem components that can be seen as ecotones between different ecosystems had high impact risk. We show how this information can be used in informing management on trade-offs in freshwater, coastal and marine resource use and aid decision-making.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecosystems; Biodiversity; Biota; Coastal; Drivers; Freshwater; Marine; Pressures; Stressors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30586824     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Spatio-Temporal Variations of Zooplankton and Correlations with Environmental Parameters around Tiaowei Island, Fujian, China.

Authors:  Zhi Zhang; Zhizhou Shi; Zefeng Yu; Konglin Zhou; Jing Lin; Jiangyue Wu; Jingli Mu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Population genetics and conservation of recently discovered springsnails in Arizona.

Authors:  Philip Lavretsky; Esmeralda Duenez; Jeffrey Sorensen
Journal:  J Molluscan Stud       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.631

3.  Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook.

Authors:  Sandra Poikane; Martyn G Kelly; Fuensanta Salas Herrero; Jo-Anne Pitt; Helen P Jarvie; Ulrich Claussen; Wera Leujak; Anne Lyche Solheim; Heliana Teixeira; Geoff Phillips
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Freshwater systems and ecosystem services: Challenges and chances for cross-fertilization of disciplines.

Authors:  Ágnes Vári; Simone A Podschun; Tibor Erős; Thomas Hein; Beáta Pataki; Ioan-Cristian Iojă; Cristian Mihai Adamescu; Almut Gerhardt; Tamás Gruber; Anita Dedić; Miloš Ćirić; Bojan Gavrilović; András Báldi
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 5.  Functional measures as potential indicators of down-the-drain chemical stress in freshwater ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Laura J Harrison; Katie A Pearson; Christopher J Wheatley; Jane K Hill; Lorraine Maltby; Claudia Rivetti; Lucy Speirs; Piran C L White
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.084

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.