Hemin Lee1, Sandra M Shi2,3, Dae Hyun Kim1,2,3. 1. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Home time, the number of days alive and spent out of hospital and skilled nursing facility, has been proposed as a patient-centered outcome that can be readily calculated in administrative claims data. OBJECTIVES: To compare home time against existing patient-centered outcome measures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4594 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with complete survey and claims data in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey 2010 to 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Home time was calculated from the 2011 claims data (range, 0-365 days). The 1-year incidence of patient-centered outcomes (poor self-rated health, mobility impairment, depression, limited social activity, and difficulty in self-care) was measured. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was derived by contrasting the mean home time between those who experienced functional decline or death and those who did not. RESULTS: The mean home time was 355.8 days (SD, 42.1 days); 84.1% had a home time of 365 days, and 5.7% had a home time of 336 days or fewer. The incidence of poor self-rated health ranged from 2% (home time, 365 days) to 21% (home time, less than 337 days). Similarly, the corresponding incidence risks were 11% to 59% for mobility impairment, 5% to 19% for depression, 17% to 67% for limited social activity, and 13% to 68% for difficulty in self-care. The risk of mobility impairment, depression, and difficulty in self-care increased steeply after home time loss of 15 days or greater. The MCID of home time was 18.6 days. CONCLUSION: A loss in home time is associated with decline in several patient-centered outcome measures in community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries. These results provide empirical evidence to promote adoption of home time and its clinical interpretation for database studies of medical interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:347-351, 2019.
BACKGROUND: Home time, the number of days alive and spent out of hospital and skilled nursing facility, has been proposed as a patient-centered outcome that can be readily calculated in administrative claims data. OBJECTIVES: To compare home time against existing patient-centered outcome measures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4594 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with complete survey and claims data in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey 2010 to 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Home time was calculated from the 2011 claims data (range, 0-365 days). The 1-year incidence of patient-centered outcomes (poor self-rated health, mobility impairment, depression, limited social activity, and difficulty in self-care) was measured. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was derived by contrasting the mean home time between those who experienced functional decline or death and those who did not. RESULTS: The mean home time was 355.8 days (SD, 42.1 days); 84.1% had a home time of 365 days, and 5.7% had a home time of 336 days or fewer. The incidence of poor self-rated health ranged from 2% (home time, 365 days) to 21% (home time, less than 337 days). Similarly, the corresponding incidence risks were 11% to 59% for mobility impairment, 5% to 19% for depression, 17% to 67% for limited social activity, and 13% to 68% for difficulty in self-care. The risk of mobility impairment, depression, and difficulty in self-care increased steeply after home time loss of 15 days or greater. The MCID of home time was 18.6 days. CONCLUSION: A loss in home time is associated with decline in several patient-centered outcome measures in community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries. These results provide empirical evidence to promote adoption of home time and its clinical interpretation for database studies of medical interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:347-351, 2019.
Authors: Amy Y X Yu; Edwin Rogers; Meng Wang; Tolulope T Sajobi; Shelagh B Coutts; Bijoy K Menon; Michael D Hill; Eric E Smith Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Nishant K Mishra; Ashfaq Shuaib; Patrick Lyden; Hans-Christoph Diener; James Grotta; Stephen Davis; Antoni Davalos; Tim Ashwood; Warren Wasiewski; Kennedy R Lees Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Cono A Ariti; John G F Cleland; Stuart J Pocock; Marc A Pfeffer; Karl Swedberg; Christopher B Granger; John J V McMurray; Eric L Michelson; Jan Ostergren; Salim Yusuf Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Emily C O'Brien; Ying Xian; Haolin Xu; Jingjing Wu; Jeffrey L Saver; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm; Eric D Peterson; Mathew J Reeves; Deepak L Bhatt; Lesley Maisch; Deidre Hannah; Brianna Lindholm; DaiWai Olson; Janet Prvu Bettger; Michael Pencina; Adrian F Hernandez; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Emily C O'Brien; Melissa A Greiner; Ying Xian; Gregg C Fonarow; DaiWai M Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric E Smith; Lesley Maisch; Deidre Hannah; Brianna Lindholm; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Pencina; Adrian F Hernandez Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Girish Valluru; Jean Yudin; Christine L Patterson; Joanna Kubisiak; Peter Boling; George Taler; Karl Eric De Jonge; Steve Touzell; Ann Danish; Katherine Ornstein; Bruce Kinosian Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Katherine C Lee; Jocelyn Streid; Dan Sturgeon; Stuart Lipsitz; Joel S Weissman; Ronnie A Rosenthal; Dae H Kim; Susan L Mitchell; Zara Cooper Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anica C Law; Jennifer P Stevens; Eunhee Choi; Changyu Shen; Anuj B Mehta; Robert W Yeh; Allan J Walkey Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2022-03
Authors: Rajeshwari Nair; Yubo Gao; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Eli Perencevich; Saket Girotra; Ambarish Pandey Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Shubing Cai; Orna Intrator; Caitlin Chan; Laurence Buxbaum; Mary Ann Haggerty; Ciaran S Phibbs; Edna Schwab; Bruce Kinosian Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Claire Sokas; Katherine C Lee; Daniel Sturgeon; Jocelyn Streid; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joel S Weissman; Dae H Kim; Zara Cooper Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 5.576
Authors: Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson L Mahar; Victoria Zuk; Haoyu Zhao; Frances C Wright; Amy T Hsu; Julie Hallet Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 14.766