Girish Valluru1, Jean Yudin2,3, Christine L Patterson4, Joanna Kubisiak5, Peter Boling4,3, George Taler3,6,7, Karl Eric De Jonge3,6,7, Steve Touzell8, Ann Danish8, Katherine Ornstein9, Bruce Kinosian2,3,10,11,12. 1. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 2. Division of Geriatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Independence at Home Learning Collaborative, American Academy of Home Care Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Division of Geriatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 5. Westat Inc, Rockville, Maryland. 6. MedStar House Call Program, MedStar Health, Washington, DC. 7. School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. 8. Philadelphia Corporation for Aging, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 9. Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 10. Geriatrics and Extended Care Data Analysis Center, Cpl Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 11. Center for Health Equity Research and Policy, Cpl Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 12. Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of home-based primary care (HBPC) for frail older adults, operating under Independence at Home (IAH) incentive alignment on long-term institutionalization (LTI). DESIGN: Case-cohort study using HBPC site, Medicare administrative data, and National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) benchmarks. SETTING: Three IAH-participating HBPC sites in Philadelphia, PA, Richmond, VA, and Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: HBPC integrated with long-term services and supports (LTSS) cases (n = 721) and concurrent comparison groups (HBPC not integrated with LTSS: n = 82; no HBPC: n = 573). Cases were eligible if enrolled at one of the three HBPC sites from 2012 to 2015. Independence at Home-qualified (IAH-Q) concurrent comparison groups were selected from Philadelphia, PA; Richmond, VA; and Washington, DC. INTERVENTION: HBPC integrated with LTSS under IAH demonstration incentives. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements include LTI rate and mortality rates, community survival, and LTSS costs. RESULTS: The LTI rate in the three HBPC programs (8%) was less than that of both concurrent comparison groups (IAH-Q beneficiaries not receiving HBPC, 16%; patients receiving HBPC but not in the IAH demonstration practices, 18%). LTI for patients at each HBPC site declined over the three study years (9.9%, 9.4%, and 4.9%, respectively). Costs of home- and community-based services (HCBS) were nonsignificantly lower among integrated care patients ($2151/mo; observed-to-expected ratio = .88 [.68-1.09]). LTI-free survival in the IAH HBPC group was 85% at 36 months, extending average community residence by 12.8 months compared with IAH-q participants in NHATS. CONCLUSION: HBPC integrated with long-term support services delays LTI in frail, medically complex Medicare beneficiaries without increasing HCBS costs.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of home-based primary care (HBPC) for frail older adults, operating under Independence at Home (IAH) incentive alignment on long-term institutionalization (LTI). DESIGN: Case-cohort study using HBPC site, Medicare administrative data, and National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) benchmarks. SETTING: Three IAH-participating HBPC sites in Philadelphia, PA, Richmond, VA, and Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: HBPC integrated with long-term services and supports (LTSS) cases (n = 721) and concurrent comparison groups (HBPC not integrated with LTSS: n = 82; no HBPC: n = 573). Cases were eligible if enrolled at one of the three HBPC sites from 2012 to 2015. Independence at Home-qualified (IAH-Q) concurrent comparison groups were selected from Philadelphia, PA; Richmond, VA; and Washington, DC. INTERVENTION: HBPC integrated with LTSS under IAH demonstration incentives. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements include LTI rate and mortality rates, community survival, and LTSS costs. RESULTS: The LTI rate in the three HBPC programs (8%) was less than that of both concurrent comparison groups (IAH-Q beneficiaries not receiving HBPC, 16%; patients receiving HBPC but not in the IAH demonstration practices, 18%). LTI for patients at each HBPC site declined over the three study years (9.9%, 9.4%, and 4.9%, respectively). Costs of home- and community-based services (HCBS) were nonsignificantly lower among integrated care patients ($2151/mo; observed-to-expected ratio = .88 [.68-1.09]). LTI-free survival in the IAH HBPC group was 85% at 36 months, extending average community residence by 12.8 months compared with IAH-qparticipants in NHATS. CONCLUSION: HBPC integrated with long-term support services delays LTI in frail, medically complex Medicare beneficiaries without increasing HCBS costs.
Authors: Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Jennifer C Cornman; Emily M Agree; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Vincent Mor; Brenda C Spillman; Robert Wallace; Douglas A Wolf Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jennifer M Reckrey; Mia Yang; Bruce Kinosian; Evan Bollens-Lund; Bruce Leff; Christine Ritchie; Katherine Ornstein Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Christine D Jones; Kathryn A Nearing; Robert E Burke; Hillary D Lum; Rebecca S Boxer; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Mustafa Ozkaynak; Cari R Levy Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Rebecca S Crow; Christian Haudenschild; Matthew C Lohman; Robert M Roth; Meredith Roderka; Travis Masterson; John Brand; Tyler Gooding; Todd A Mackenzie; John A Batsis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Meaghan A Kennedy; Kayla E Hatchell; Peter R DiMilia; Stephanie M Kelly; Heather B Blunt; Pamela J Bagley; Michael A LaMantia; Charles F Reynolds; Rebecca S Crow; Tara N Maden; S Logan Kelly; Jacqueline M Kihwele; John A Batsis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Erin D Bouldin; Christopher A Taylor; Kenneth A Knapp; Christina E Miyawaki; Nicholas R Mercado; Karen G Wooten; Lisa C McGuire Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 7.191
Authors: Claire K Ankuda; Bruce Leff; Christine S Ritchie; Omari-Khalid Rahman; Katelyn B Ferreira; Evan Bollens-Lund; Katherine A Ornstein Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Bruce Leff; Orla C Sheehan; Krista L Harrison; Ashley Eaton England; Alex Mickler; Pragyashree Sharma Basyal; Sarah K Garrigues; Mattan Schuchman; Carla Perissinotto; Sarah B Garrett; Christine S Ritchie Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2021-04-01