BACKGROUND: Conventional composite outcomes in heart failure (HF) trials, for example, time to cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization, have recognized limitations. We propose an alternative outcome, days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), which incorporates mortality and all hospitalizations into a single measure. A refinement, the patient journey, also uses functional status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class) measured during follow-up. The CHARM program is used to illustrate the methodology. METHODS:CHARM randomized 7,599 patients with symptomatic HF toplacebo or candesartan, with median follow-up of 38 months. We related DAOH and percent DAOH (ie, percentage of time spent alive and out of hospital) to treatment using linear regression adjusting for follow-up time. RESULTS:Mean increase in DAOH for patients on candesartan versus placebo was 24.1 days (95% CI 9.8-38.3 days, P < .001). The corresponding mean increase in percent DAOH was 2.0% (95% CI 0.8%-3.1%, P < .001). These findings were dominated by reduced mortality (23 days) but enhanced by reduced time in hospital (1 day). Percent time spent in hospital because of HF was reduced by 0.10% (95% CI 0.04%-0.14%, P < .001). The patient journey analysis showed that patients in the candesartan group spent more follow-up time in NYHA classes I and II and less in NYHA class IV. CONCLUSIONS: Days alive and out of hospital, especially percent DAOH, provide a valuable tool for summarizing the overall absolute treatment effect on mortality and morbidity. In future HF trials, percent DAOH can provide a useful alternative perspective on the effects of treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Conventional composite outcomes in heart failure (HF) trials, for example, time to cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization, have recognized limitations. We propose an alternative outcome, days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), which incorporates mortality and all hospitalizations into a single measure. A refinement, the patient journey, also uses functional status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class) measured during follow-up. The CHARM program is used to illustrate the methodology. METHODS: CHARM randomized 7,599 patients with symptomatic HF to placebo or candesartan, with median follow-up of 38 months. We related DAOH and percent DAOH (ie, percentage of time spent alive and out of hospital) to treatment using linear regression adjusting for follow-up time. RESULTS: Mean increase in DAOH for patients on candesartan versus placebo was 24.1 days (95% CI 9.8-38.3 days, P < .001). The corresponding mean increase in percent DAOH was 2.0% (95% CI 0.8%-3.1%, P < .001). These findings were dominated by reduced mortality (23 days) but enhanced by reduced time in hospital (1 day). Percent time spent in hospital because of HF was reduced by 0.10% (95% CI 0.04%-0.14%, P < .001). The patient journey analysis showed that patients in the candesartan group spent more follow-up time in NYHA classes I and II and less in NYHA class IV. CONCLUSIONS: Days alive and out of hospital, especially percent DAOH, provide a valuable tool for summarizing the overall absolute treatment effect on mortality and morbidity. In future HF trials, percent DAOH can provide a useful alternative perspective on the effects of treatment.
Authors: Alexander C Fanaroff; Derek Cyr; Megan L Neely; Jeffery Bakal; Harvey D White; Keith A A Fox; Paul W Armstrong; Renato D Lopes; E Magnus Ohman; Matthew T Roe Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-12
Authors: L Decook; Y-H Chang; J Slack; D Gastineau; J Leis; P Noel; J Palmer; L Sproat; M Sorror; N Khera Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Ian J Neeland; Sandeep R Das; DaJuanicia N Simon; Deborah B Diercks; Karen P Alexander; Tracy Y Wang; James A de Lemos Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2017-07-01
Authors: Toby Richards; Ravishankar Rao Baikady; Ben Clevenger; Anna Butcher; Sandy Abeysiri; Marisa Chau; Rebecca Swinson; Tim Collier; Matthew Dodd; Laura Van Dyck; Iain Macdougall; Gavin Murphy; John Browne; Andrew Bradbury; Andrew Klein Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Jacob Abraham; Rupinder Bharmi; Orvar Jonsson; Guilherme H Oliveira; Andre Artis; Ali Valika; Robert Capodilupo; Philip B Adamson; Gregory Roberts; Nirav Dalal; Akshay S Desai; Raymond L Benza Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Cristal L Brown; Bradley G Hammill; Laura G Qualls; Lesley H Curtis; Andrew J Muir Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: T Bittermann; R A Hubbard; M Serper; J D Lewis; S F Hohmann; L B VanWagner; D S Goldberg Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Kazem Rahimi; Carmelo Velardo; Andreas Triantafyllidis; Nathalie Conrad; Syed Ahmar Shah; Tracey Chantler; Hamid Mohseni; Emma Stoppani; Francesca Moore; Chris Paton; Connor A Emdin; Johanna Ernst; Lionel Tarassenko; Kazem Rahimi; Carmelo Velardo; Andreas Triantafyllidis; Nathalie Conrad; Syed Ahmar Shah; Tracey Chantler; Hamid Mohseni; Emma Stoppani; Francesca Moore; Chris Paton; Lionel Tarassenko; John Cleland; Felicity Emptage; Tracey Chantler; Andrew Farmer; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Richard Hobbs; Stephen MacMahon; Alan Perkins; Kazem Rahimi; Lionel Tarassenko; Paul Altmann; Badri Chandrasekaran; Connor A Emdin; Johanna Ernst; Paul Foley; Fred Hersch; Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Joanne Noble; Mark Woodward Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2015-11-01