| Literature DB >> 30577728 |
Fang Fang1,2, Jie Xu3,4, Qiaoyu Li3,4, Xiaoxuan Xia3,4, Guocheng Du3,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The microflora composition of the oral cavity affects oral health. Some strains of commensal bacteria confer probiotic benefits to the host. Lactobacillus is one of the main probiotic genera that has been used to treat oral infections. The objective of this study was to select lactobacilli with a spectrum of probiotic properties and investigate their potential roles in oral health.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesion; Antimicrobial activity; Hydrogen peroxide; Immunomodulation; Lactobacillus brevis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30577728 PMCID: PMC6303927 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-018-1369-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus brevis BBE-Y52 against Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175. Control, growth of S. mutans ATCC 25175 with addition of lactic acid (pH 4.2) in the well; L. brevis BBE-Y52, inhibition of S. mutans ATCC 25175 by the supernatant of L. brevis BBE-Y52
Acid production by Lactobacillus brevis BBE-Y52, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Streptococcus mutans
| Strains | pHa | Average pHb | Lactic acidc (g/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | Sucrose | Lactose | Fructose | |||
| 3.86 ± 0.01 | 4.02 ± 0.03 | 4.07 ± 0.02* | 3.77 ± 0.03 | 3.93* | 1.74 ± 0.12** | |
| 3.81 ± 0.03 | 3.90 ± 0.04 | 3.98 ± 0.02 | 3.80 ± 0.02 | 3.87 | 2.64 ± 0.09 | |
| 3.90 ± 0.02* | 3.87 ± 0.03* | 3.95 ± 0.01 | 3.74 ± 0.03 | 3.86 | 2.53 ± 0.07 | |
a, pH values of strain cultures grown in medium containing single carbon source; b, average pH values; c, production of lactic acid by corresponding strains cultivated in MRS broth
* and ** represent significant (P < 0.05) and extremely significant (P < 0.01) differences based on Student’s t-test
Fig. 2Tolerance of Lactobacillus brevis BBE-Y52 to hydrogen peroxide
The tolerance of L. brevis BBE-Y52 to antibiotics
| Antibiotics (μg/L) | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ampicillin | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| chloramphenicol | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| tetracycline | + | + | + | – | – | – | – |
| kanamycin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| streptomycin | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
+, tolerant; −, susceptible
Fig. 3Aciduric profile of Lactobacillus brevis BBE-Y52. Survival of Lactobacillus strains challenged with acidic conditions at pH 2.0 (lines) and pH 3.0 (dot lines)
Fig. 4Auto-aggregation of Lactobacillus brevis BBE-Y52 and coaggregation of BBE-Y52 with oral pathogens. Auto-aggregation (lines) of individual strain and coaggregation (dot lines) of BBE-Y52 with oral pathogens. Solid symbols: square, L. brevis BBE-Y52; circle, Porphyromonas gingivalis GIM1.851; upper triangle, Fusobacterium nucleatum CGMCC 1.2528; lower triangle, Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175; Open symbols: right triangle, L. brevis BBE-Y52 + S. mutans ATCC 25175; diamond, L. brevis BBE-Y52 + P. gingivalis GIM1.851; star, L. brevis BBE-Y52 + F. nucleatum CGMCC 1.2528
Fig. 5Biofilm formation by Lactobacillus brevis BBE-Y52 and S. mutans ATCC 25175. Black bars, white bars and grey bars represent the biofilm formed by individual Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, L. brevis BBE-Y52, and both strains, respectively. * and ** represent significant (P < 0.05) and extremely significant (P < 0.01) differences based on Student’s t-test
PBMC cytokine levels in response to co-culturing with L. brevis BBE-Y52 or S. mutans
| Cytokine | aPBMCs | bPBMCs + | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | BBE-Y52 | Control | BBE-Y52 | ||
| IL-10 (pg mL− 1) | 164 ± 2 | 186 ± 2 | 177 ± 4 | 248 ± 2 | 243 ± 3 |
| IL-12p70 (pg mL− 1) | 28 ± 2 | 31 ± 1 | 33 ± 1 | 65 ± 2 | 59 ± 2 |
| IL-10/IL-12p70 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.1* | 5.4 ± 0.1* | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 0.1* |
a, PBMCs incubated either alone (control) or with BBE-Y52/S. mutans for 12 h; b, S. mutans treated PBMCs was incubated either alone (control) or with BBE-Y52 for 24 h; * IL-10-to-IL-12p70 ratio was significant (P < 0.05) based on Student’s t-test