Literature DB >> 30573123

High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Novel Index of Esophageal Injury.

Alex Baher1, Mobin Kheirkhahan2, Stephen J Rechenmacher3, Qussay Marashly2, Eugene G Kholmovski4, Johannes Siebermair5, Madan Acharya3, Mossab Aljuaid3, Alan K Morris2, Gagandeep Kaur2, Frederick T Han1, Brent D Wilson1, Benjamin A Steinberg1, Nassir F Marrouche1, Mihail G Chelu6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study retrospectively evaluated the feasibility and esophageal thermal injury (ETI) patterns of high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.
BACKGROUND: ETI following AF ablation can lead to serious complications. Little consensus exists on the optimal radiofrequency power setting or on the optimal strategy to assess ETI.
METHODS: A total of 687 patients undergoing first-time AF ablation with either HPSD ablation (50 W for 5 s, n = 574) or low-power long-duration ablation (LPLD, ≤35 W for 10 to 30 s, n = 113) were analyzed. ETI was assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 24 h post-ablation. Patients with moderate or severe esophageal LGE had a follow-up MRI within 24 h to 1 week, and esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed when significant gastrointestinal symptoms or persistent LGE on repeat MRI was present. AF recurrence adjusted for potential confounders was analyzed.
RESULTS: The average age was 69.0 ± 11.8 years in the group undergoing HPSD ablation versus 68.3 ± 11.6 years in the LPLD group (p = 0.554), with 67.1% versus 59.3% male (p = 0.111). Esophageal LGE patterns were similar (64.8% vs. 57.5% none, 21.0% vs. 28.3% mild, 11.5% vs. 11.5% moderate, 2.8% vs. 2.7% severe for HPSD vs. LPLD, respectively; p = 0.370) with no atrioesophageal fistulas. Mean procedure length was significantly shorter in the HPSD group (149 ± 65 min vs. 251 ± 101 min; p < 0.001). AF recurrence rates were similar in the 2 groups for the mean 2.5-year follow-up period (adjusted, 42% vs. 41%; p = 0.571).
CONCLUSIONS: HPSD ablation results in similar ETI patterns, as assessed by same-day LGE MRI, compared with the LPLD setting but with significantly shorter procedure times. Recurrence rates at 2.5-year follow-up are similar.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; esophageal injury; magnetic resonance imaging; power setting; radiofrequency ablation; thermal injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30573123     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  21 in total

1.  Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Dibbendhu Khanra; Abdul Hamid; Saurabh Deshpande; Anindya Mukherjee; Sanjiv Petkar; Mohammad Saeed; Indranill Basu-Ray
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 2.  Innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Jitae A Kim; Khurrum Khan; Riyad Kherallah; Shamis Khan; Ishan Kamat; Owais Ulhaq; Qussay Marashly; Mihail G Chelu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  A Model Incorporating Left Ventricular Impedance Index may be Explanatory for Late Pulmonary Vein Isolation Failure.

Authors:  Shimaa Khidr; Mark Doyle; Geetha Rayarao; William Belden; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  Austin J Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-14

4.  High-power, short-duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Koichiro Kumagai; Hideko Toyama
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-07-16

5.  Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study.

Authors:  Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón; Marcel Martínez Cossiani; Marta Ortega Molina; Carlos Escobar; Consuelo Froilán Torres; Nerea Gonzalo Bada; Marta Díaz de la Torre; José Manuel Suárez Parga; José Luis López Sendón; José Luis Merino
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Efficiency, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xuerong Sun; Jiang Lu; Jinxuan Lin; Tianjie Feng; Ni Suo; Lihui Zheng; Zhimin Liu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Shu Zhang; Guodong Niu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  The efficacy of high-power short-duration radiofrequency for atrial fibrillation ablation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Ling Ma; Fei Wang; Liang Shi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Whole-Heart High-Resolution Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Solenn Toupin; Théo Pezel; Aurélien Bustin; Hubert Cochet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.119

9.  Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint.

Authors:  Koichiro Ejima; Satoshi Higuchi; Kyoichiro Yazaki; Shohei Kataoka; Daigo Yagishita; Miwa Kanai; Morio Shoda; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-15

10.  The industrialization of ablation: a highly standardized and reproducible workflow for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tom De Potter; Tina D Hunter; Lee Ming Boo; Sofia Chatzikyriakou; Teresa Strisciuglio; Etel Silva; Peter Geelen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.