Jitae A Kim1, Khurrum Khan2, Riyad Kherallah1, Shamis Khan1, Ishan Kamat1, Owais Ulhaq2, Qussay Marashly3, Mihail G Chelu4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Division of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge Suite A6.137, Houston, TX, MS: BCM621, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 4. Division of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge Suite A6.137, Houston, TX, MS: BCM621, USA. Mihail.Chelu@bcm.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catheter-based ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has established itself as a mainstay in the rhythm control strategy of atrial fibrillation. This review article aims to provide an overview of recent advances in atrial fibrillation ablation technology. METHODS: We reviewed the available literature and clinical trials of innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation technologies including ablation catheter designs, alternative energy sources, esophageal protection methods, electroanatomical mapping, and novel ablation targets. RESULTS: Innovative radiofrequency (RF) catheter designs maximize energy delivery while avoiding overheating associated with conventional catheters. Single-shot balloon catheters in the form of cryoballoons, radiofrequency, and laser balloons have proven effective at producing pulmonary vein isolation and improving procedural efficiency and reproducibility. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a highly anticipated novel nonthermal energy source under development, which demonstrates selective ablation of the myocardium, producing durable lesions while also minimizing collateral damage. Innovative devices for esophageal protection including esophageal deviation and cooling devices have been developed to reduce esophageal complications. Improved electroanatomical mapping systems are being developed to help identify additional non-pulmonary triggers, which may benefit from ablation, especially with persistent atrial fibrillation. Lastly, the vein of Marshall alcohol ablation has been recently studied as an adjunct therapy for improving outcomes with catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous advances have been made in the field of atrial fibrillation ablation in the past decade. While further long-term data is still needed for these novel technologies, they show potential to improve procedural efficacy and safety.
BACKGROUND: Catheter-based ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has established itself as a mainstay in the rhythm control strategy of atrial fibrillation. This review article aims to provide an overview of recent advances in atrial fibrillation ablation technology. METHODS: We reviewed the available literature and clinical trials of innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation technologies including ablation catheter designs, alternative energy sources, esophageal protection methods, electroanatomical mapping, and novel ablation targets. RESULTS: Innovative radiofrequency (RF) catheter designs maximize energy delivery while avoiding overheating associated with conventional catheters. Single-shot balloon catheters in the form of cryoballoons, radiofrequency, and laser balloons have proven effective at producing pulmonary vein isolation and improving procedural efficiency and reproducibility. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a highly anticipated novel nonthermal energy source under development, which demonstrates selective ablation of the myocardium, producing durable lesions while also minimizing collateral damage. Innovative devices for esophageal protection including esophageal deviation and cooling devices have been developed to reduce esophageal complications. Improved electroanatomical mapping systems are being developed to help identify additional non-pulmonary triggers, which may benefit from ablation, especially with persistent atrial fibrillation. Lastly, the vein of Marshall alcohol ablation has been recently studied as an adjunct therapy for improving outcomes with catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous advances have been made in the field of atrial fibrillation ablation in the past decade. While further long-term data is still needed for these novel technologies, they show potential to improve procedural efficacy and safety.
Authors: Jin Iwasawa; Jacob S Koruth; Jan Petru; Libor Dujka; Stepan Kralovec; Katerina Mzourkova; Srinivas R Dukkipati; Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Europace Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Jason G Andrade; Jean Champagne; Marc Dubuc; Marc W Deyell; Atul Verma; Laurent Macle; Peter Leong-Sit; Paul Novak; Mariano Badra-Verdu; John Sapp; Iqwal Mangat; Clarence Khoo; Christian Steinberg; Matthew T Bennett; Anthony S L Tang; Paul Khairy Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mohammed A Al-Hijji; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Xiaoxi Yao; Raphael Mwangi; Lindsey R Sangaralingham; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham; Douglas L Packer; Nilay D Shah; Peter A Noseworthy Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Srinivas R Dukkipati; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Jean-Paul Albenque; Josef Kautzner; Dipen Shah; Gregory Michaud; Marcus Wharton; David Harari; Srijoy Mahapatra; Hendrik Lambert; Moussa Mansour Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Aakriti Gupta; Tharani Perera; Anand Ganesan; Thomas Sullivan; Dennis H Lau; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Anthony G Brooks; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-11-15
Authors: Gerhard Steinbeck; Moritz F Sinner; Manuel Lutz; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Stefan Kääb; Holger Reinecke Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 29.983