| Literature DB >> 30567319 |
Chau-Zen Wang1,2,3,4, Yan-Hsiung Wang5,6, Che-Wei Lin7, Tien-Ching Lee8,9,10, Yin-Chih Fu11,12,13, Mei-Ling Ho14,15,16, Chih-Kuang Wang17,18,19,20.
Abstract
The fragile nature of porous bioceramic substitutes cannot match the toughness of bone, which limits the use of these materials in clinical load-bearing applications. Statins can enhance bone healing, but it could show rhabdomyolysis/inflammatory response after overdosing. In this study, the drug-containing bone grafts were developed from poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid)-polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG) nanoparticles encapsulating simvastatin (SIM) (SIM-PP NPs) loaded within an appropriately mechanical bioceramic scaffold (BC). The combination bone graft provides dual functions of osteoconduction and osteoinduction. The mechanical properties of the bioceramic are enhanced mainly based on the admixture of a combustible reverse-negative thermoresponsive hydrogel (poly(N-isopropylacrylamide base). We showed that SIM-PP NPs can increase the activity of alkaline phosphatase and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells. To verify the bone-healing efficacy of this drug-containing bone grafts, a nonunion radial endochondral ossification bone defect rabbit model (N = 3/group) and a nonunion calvarial intramembranous defect Sprague Dawley (SD) rat model (N = 5/group) were used. The results indicated that SIM-PP NPs combined with BC can improve the healing of nonunion bone defects of the radial bone and calvarial bone. Therefore, the BC containing SIM-PP NPs may be appropriate for clinical use as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting that can overcome the problem of determining the clinical dosage of simvastatin drugs to promote bone healing.Entities:
Keywords: bioceramic; combination; nanoparticles; scaffold; simvastatin; sustained release
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30567319 PMCID: PMC6321089 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19124099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
The encapsulation efficiency, loading efficiency and average size of the nanoparticles encapsulating simvastatin (SIM) (SIM-PP NPs).
| Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%) | Loading Efficiency (LE%) | Mean Particle Diameter (nm) | Zeta Potential (mv) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33.6 ± 3.5 | 3.2 | 120.3 ± 8.5 | −32.7 ± 3.1 |
Note: EE% is encapsulation efficiency percentage and LE is drug loading amount of per milligrams.
Figure 1Two types of porous bioceramic samples are shown below: one is disk mold (a1, ϕ 5 mm; h 0.7 mm) and the other is hollow cylinder mold (b1, ϕ1 3.5 mm; ϕ2 1.5 mm; h 10 mm), these are all combined with SIM-PP nanoparticles and promote bone growth. Daily release profiles of the active form of simvastatin (act-SIM) measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography at 37 °C for 7–10 days. (a2) SIM-PP NPs loaded within disk bioceramic samples (ϕ 5 mm; h 0.7 mm; BCdisk). (b2) SIM-PP NPs loaded within hollow cylinder bioceramic samples (ϕ1 3.5 mm; ϕ2 1.5 mm; h 10 mm). (a3,b3) Average percentages of act-SIM cumulative release. Notes: SIM-PP NP 2.5/BCdisk: the 2.5 μg simvastatin loaded with disk bioceramic; SIM-PP NP 5/BCdisk: the 5.0 μg simvastatin loaded with disk bioceramic; SIM-PP NP 5/BCcylinder: the 5.0 μg simvastatin loaded with hollow cylinder bioceramic; SIM-PP NP 10/BCcylinder: the 10.0 μg simvastatin loaded with hollow cylinder bioceramic.
The phase ratio of HAp/β-TCP, bulk density and porosity of the bioceramics after sintering at 1200 °C for 2 h.
| Phase Ratio of HAp/β-TCP | Porosity (%) | Bulk Density (g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|
| 50/50 | 56.29 ± 0.55 | ~1.50 ± 0.01 |
Note: Theoretical density (50% HAp + 50% β-TCP) = 3.11 (g/cm3).
Figure 2Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity evaluated in D1 cells. D1 cells were treated with 0.5 µM active form of simvastatin (act-SIM) in bone medium or treated with 0.5 μM act-SIM released from SIM-PP NPs loaded within bioceramic samples in bone medium for 5 days. The cells were further cultured in osteoinduction medium (OIM) for another 3 and 5 days. The control groups were not treated with act-SIM. Note: *** p < 0.001 and ** p < 0.01 com pare to day 5 Control.
Figure 3Representative calvarial bone defects of the rat model are shown in experimental photograph (a). The radiography study observed (b) calvarial bone defects of the rat model at 0, 4 and 8 weeks after implantation of 2.5 μmol of SIM and 5.0 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCdisk samples (ϕ 5 mm; h 0.7 mm). Notes: calvarial bone defects only were used as controls.
Figure 4Typical Hounsfield unit (HU) calibration of micro-CT images and histological study of calvarial bone defects in the rat model only (a) and 8 weeks after implantation of BCdisk (ϕ 5 mm; h 0.7 mm) (b), 2.5 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCdisk (c), or 5.0 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCdisk (d). Callus quantification study of these calvarial bone defects groups (e). Notes: Non-union defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls; N = 5/group. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 compare control.
Figure 5A representative radial bone defect rabbit model is shown in experimental photograph (a). The radiography study was performed to evaluate (b) the 10-mm nonunion radial bone defect rabbit model at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks after implantation of BCcylinder samples (ϕ1 3.5 mm; ϕ2 1.5 mm; h 10 mm), 5.0 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCcylinder and 10.0 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCcylinder.
Figure 6The SIM-PP 10/BCcylinder group had the highest new bone formation. H&E staining (a) and IHC staining of von Willebrand factor (VWF) (b) of the 10-mm nonunion radial bone defect rabbit model at 10 weeks after implantation of BCcylinder samples (ϕ1 3.5 mm; ϕ2 1.5 mm; h 10 mm), 5.0 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCcylinder and 10.0 μmol of SIM in SIM-PP/BCcylinder. BC: bioceramic. Arrows indicate the VWF staining. Quantification of new bone formation of these 10-mm nonunion radial bone defect rabbit groups (c). (N = 3; ** p < 0.01 compare BCcylinder). Scale bars = 10 mm.