| Literature DB >> 30561261 |
Abbas H Zaidi1,2, Jane W Newburger1,2, David Wypij1,2,3, Christian Stopp1, Christopher G Watson4, Kevin G Friedman1,2, Michael J Rivkin4,5,6,7, Caitlin K Rollins4,7.
Abstract
Background In neonates with single ventricle, smaller ascending aorta diameter is associated with cerebral white matter ( WM ) microstructural abnormalities. We sought to determine whether this association persists into adolescence. Methods and Results Ascending aorta Z scores were obtained from first postnatal echocardiogram. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion tensor imaging was acquired in adolescence and used to obtain fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity in 33 WM tract regions of interest. Partial Pearson correlation coefficients were evaluated for associations between ascending aorta Z scores and WM microstructure measures, adjusting for sex, age at magnetic resonance imaging, scanner field strength, and Norwood status. Among 42 single ventricle patients aged 10 to 19 years, 31 had undergone the Norwood procedure as neonates. Lower ascending aorta Z scores were associated with lower fractional anisotropy in bilateral pontine crossing tracts ( P=0.02), inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus ( P=0.02), and inferior longitudinal fasciculus ( P=0.01); left cingulum-cingulate bundle ( P=0.01), superior longitudinal fasciculus ( P=0.04), and superior longitudinal fasciculus-temporal component ( P=0.01); and right cingulum-hippocampal bundle (P=0.009) and inferior cerebellar peduncle ( P=0.01). Lower ascending aorta Z scores were associated with higher radial diffusivity and mean diffusivity in a similar regional pattern but not with axial diffusivity. Conclusions In adolescents with single ventricle, smaller aorta diameter at birth is associated with abnormalities of WM microstructure in a subset of WM tracts, mostly those located in deeper brain regions. Our findings suggest that despite multiple intervening medical or surgical procedures, prenatal cerebral blood flow may have a lasting influence on WM microstructure in single-ventricle patients.Entities:
Keywords: brain; congenital heart disease; echocardiography; magnetic resonance imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30561261 PMCID: PMC6405606 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Participant, Echocardiogram, and Medical History Characteristics of Fontan Participants With AoZ Scores and DTI Data
| Variable | Norwood (n=31) | Non‐Norwood (n=11) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Participant characteristics | |||
| Male sex, n (%) | 24 (77) | 6 (55) | 0.24 |
| Race, n (%) | >0.99 | ||
| Black | 2 (6) | 1 (9) | |
| White | 29 (94) | 10 (91) | |
| Hispanic ethnicity, n (%) | 1 (3) | 1 (9) | 0.46 |
| Genetic abnormality, n (%) | 10 (32) | 3 (27) | >0.99 |
| Birth weight, kg, mean±SD | 3.3±0.6 | 3.2±0.7 | 0.44 |
| Gestational age, wk, mean±SD | 39.0±2.2 | 38.3±2.1 | 0.32 |
| Echocardiogram characteristics | |||
| Age, d, median (range) | 0 (0–42) | 0 (0–35) | 0.57 |
| AoZ score, mean±SD | −2.5±1.5 | 0.2±1.1 | <0.001 |
| Echocardiogram to first operation, d, median (range) | 3 (1–14) | 2 (1–532) | 0.78 |
| Medical history | |||
| Status at first operation | |||
| Age, d, median (range) | 4 (1–44) | 7 (2–532) | 0.35 |
| Neonatal status (age ≤30 d), n (%) | 30 (97) | 8 (73) | 0.049 |
| Open procedure, n (%) | 31 (100) | 4 (36) | <0.001 |
| Participants undergoing DHCA, n (%) | 26 (90) | 2 (50) | 0.10 |
| DHCA duration, min, median (range) | 49 (0–107) | 26.5 (0–93) | 0.64 |
| Total support duration, min, median (range) | 127 (83–325) | 111.5 (43–191) | 0.19 |
| Number of operative complications, median (range) | 2 (0–10) | 0 (0–3) | 0.04 |
| Total operations, median (range) | 3 (2–4) | 3 (1–4) | 0.19 |
| Total open operations, median (range) | 3 (2–4) | 2 (1–3) | <0.001 |
| Total operative complications, median (range) | 3 (0–12) | 4 (0–6) | 0.56 |
| Total catheterizations, median (range) | 4 (2–8) | 4 (1–8) | 0.21 |
| Total catheterization complications, median (range) | 1 (0–4) | 1 (0–4) | 0.71 |
| Seizure, n (%) | 6 (20) | 0 | 0.17 |
| Stroke, n (%) | 1 (3) | 0 | >0.99 |
| Any neurological event, n (%) | 7 (23) | 0 | 0.16 |
| Concurrent measures | |||
| Age at MRI, y, mean±SD | 14.3±2.9 | 12.6±2.4 | 0.10 |
| Field strength, 3T, n (%) | 16 (52) | 5 (45) | >0.99 |
| Family social status, mean±SD | 46±14 | 49±12 | 0.62 |
AoZ score indicates ascending aorta Z score; DHCA, deep hypothermic cardiac arrest; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
P values for group comparisons were determined by Fisher exact tests for categorical measures, 2‐sample t tests with equal variance for continuous measures represented with means, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous measures represented with medians.
Includes seizure, stroke, choreoathetosis, and meningitis.
Score on Hollingshead Four‐Factor Index of Social Status, with higher scores indicating higher social status.
Partial Pearson Correlation Coefficients of AoZ Scores With WM ROI Measures (n=42)
| ROI | FA | AD | RD | MD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body of the corpus callosum | 0.20 (0.23) | −0.23 (0.16) | −0.25 (0.13) | −0.29 (0.08) |
| Forceps major | 0.28 (0.08) | 0.20 (0.22) | −0.20 (0.23) | −0.05 (0.75) |
| Forceps minor | 0.17 (0.29) | −0.16 (0.34) | −0.23 (0.17) | −0.22 (0.18) |
| Middle cerebellar peduncle | 0.23 (0.16) | 0.04 (0.79) | −0.18 (0.28) | −0.09 (0.58) |
| PCT | 0.37 (0.02) | 0.08 (0.62) | −0.24 (0.14) | −0.15 (0.37) |
| Anterior thalamic radiation, LH | 0.26 (0.12) | −0.12 (0.47) | −0.24 (0.14) | −0.23 (0.17) |
| Anterior thalamic radiation, RH | 0.28 (0.09) | 0.15 (0.38) | −0.17 (0.30) | −0.06 (0.72) |
| Cerebral peduncle, LH | 0.25 (0.12) | 0.16 (0.33) | −0.17 (0.31) | −0.05 (0.77) |
| Cerebral peduncle, RH | 0.17 (0.30) | 0.13 (0.43) | −0.10 (0.56) | 0.01 (0.95) |
| Cingulum–cingulate bundle, LH | 0.39 (0.01) | −0.03 (0.88) | −0.39 (0.02) | −0.30 (0.07) |
| Cingulum–cingulate bundle, RH | 0.24 (0.15) | 0.07 (0.67) | −0.14 (0.41) | −0.05 (0.77) |
| Cingulum–hippocampus bundle, LH | 0.18 (0.27) | −0.15 (0.38) | −0.36 (0.03) | −0.33 (0.04) |
| Cingulum–hippocampus bundle, RH | 0.42 (0.009) | 0.17 (0.32) | −0.46 (0.003) | −0.23 (0.17) |
| Corticospinal tract, LH | 0.11 (0.52) | −0.18 (0.27) | −0.21 (0.21) | −0.24 (0.14) |
| Corticospinal tract, RH | 0.05 (0.76) | −0.22 (0.18) | −0.22 (0.19) | −0.29 (0.08) |
| External capsule, LH | 0.25 (0.12) | 0.04 (0.81) | −0.27 (0.11) | −0.17 (0.31) |
| External capsule, RH | 0.30 (0.06) | 0.03 (0.87) | −0.33 (0.04) | −0.23 (0.17) |
| Inferior cerebellar peduncle, LH | 0.31 (0.05) | 0.12 (0.46) | −0.19 (0.26) | −0.08 (0.62) |
| Inferior cerebellar peduncle, RH | 0.40 (0.01) | −0.04 (0.81) | −0.33 (0.046) | −0.24 (0.15) |
| Inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus, LH | 0.36 (0.02) | 0.18 (0.27) | −0.31 (0.06) | −0.15 (0.38) |
| Inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus, RH | 0.36 (0.03) | 0.15 (0.35) | −0.24 (0.15) | −0.09 (0.59) |
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus, LH | 0.41 (0.01) | 0.13 (0.42) | −0.30 (0.07) | −0.16 (0.35) |
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus, RH | 0.38 (0.02) | 0.15 (0.36) | −0.26 (0.11) | −0.12 (0.47) |
| Medial lemniscus, LH | 0.05 (0.75) | −0.09 (0.59) | −0.11 (0.51) | −0.12 (0.48) |
| Medial lemniscus, RH | 0.19 (0.26) | 0.09 (0.58) | −0.12 (0.46) | −0.04 (0.80) |
| Superior cerebellar peduncle, LH | 0.04 (0.82) | 0.01 (0.95) | −0.08 (0.62) | −0.05 (0.76) |
| Superior cerebellar peduncle, RH | 0.26 (0.11) | −0.02 (0.90) | −0.27 (0.10) | −0.20 (0.23) |
| SLF, LH | 0.34 (0.04) | −0.16 (0.35) | −0.41 (0.01) | −0.40 (0.01) |
| SLF, RH | 0.23 (0.17) | −0.17 (0.29) | −0.37 (0.02) | −0.36 (0.03) |
| SLF–temporal component, LH | 0.39 (0.01) | −0.17 (0.31) | −0.45 (0.004) | −0.46 (0.004) |
| SLF–temporal component, RH | 0.17 (0.30) | −0.11 (0.50) | −0.28 (0.09) | −0.27 (0.10) |
| Uncinate fasciculus, LH | 0.20 (0.22) | 0.15 (0.37) | −0.15 (0.36) | −0.05 (0.78) |
| Uncinate fasciculus, RH | 0.20 (0.22) | 0.09 (0.61) | −0.15 (0.36) | −0.08 (0.63) |
Values are partial Pearson r (P value). P values were determined by partial Pearson correlation coefficients adjusting for sex, age at magnetic resonance imaging, scanner field strength, and Norwood status. AD indicates axial diffusivity; AoZ score, ascending aorta Z score; FA, fractional anisotropy; LH, left hemisphere; MD, mean diffusivity; PCT, pontine crossing tract; RD, radial diffusivity; RH, right hemisphere; ROI, region of interest; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; WM, white matter.
Figure 1Relationships of ascending aorta Z scores (AoZ scores) with fractional anisotropy (FA) of the (A) left superior longitudinal fasciculus (L SLF) and (B) L SLF–temporal branch, stratified by Norwood status. C, L SLF in sagittal (left), coronal (middle), and axial (right) planes. “Hot” colors represent the voxel's probability of belonging to the L SLF, based on the Johns Hopkins University white matter tractography atlas.