Jiule Ding1, Zhaoyu Xing2, Zhenxing Jiang1, Hua Zhou3, Jia Di3, Jie Chen1, Jianguo Qiu1, Shengnan Yu1, Liqiu Zou4, Wei Xing5. 1. Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China. 3. Department of Nephrology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Shenzhen nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China. 5. Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China. suzhxingwei@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of texture analysis based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), blood oxygen level-dependent MRI (BOLD), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in evaluating renal dysfunction. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (mean age 53.72 ± 13.46 years) underwent MRI consisting of DWI, BOLD, and SWI. According to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the patients were classified into either severe renal function impairment (sRI, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), non-severe renal function impairment (non-sRI, eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and < 80 mL/min/1.73 m2), or control (CG, eGFR ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m2) groups. Thirteen texture features were extracted and then were analyzed to select the most valuable for discerning the three groups with each imaging method. A ROC curve was performed to compare the capacities of the features to differentiate non-sRI from sRI or CG. RESULTS: Six features proved to be the most valuable for assessing renal dysfunction: 0.25QuantileDWI, 0.5QuantileDWI, HomogeneityDWI, EntropyBOLD, SkewnessSWI, and CorrelationSWI. Three features derived from DWI (0.25QuantileDWI, 0.5QuantileDWI, and HomogeneityDWI) were smaller in sRI than in non-sRI; EntropyBOLD and CorrelationSWI were smaller in non-sRI than in CG (p < 0.05). 0.25QuantileDWI, 0.5QuantileDWI, and HomogeneityDWI showed similar capacities for differentiating sRI from non-sRI. Similarly, EntropyBOLD and CorrelationSWI showed equal capacities for differentiating non-sRI from CG. CONCLUSION: Texture analysis based on DWI, BOLD, and SWI can assist in assessing renal dysfunction, and texture features based on BOLD and SWI may be suitable for assessing renal dysfunction during early stages. KEY POINTS: • Texture analysis based on MRI techniques allowed for assessing renal dysfunction. • Texture features based on BOLD and SWI, but not DWI, may be suitable for assessing renal function impairment during early stages. • SWI exhibited a similar capacity to BOLD for assessing renal dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of texture analysis based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), blood oxygen level-dependent MRI (BOLD), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in evaluating renal dysfunction. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (mean age 53.72 ± 13.46 years) underwent MRI consisting of DWI, BOLD, and SWI. According to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the patients were classified into either severe renal function impairment (sRI, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), non-severe renal function impairment (non-sRI, eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and < 80 mL/min/1.73 m2), or control (CG, eGFR ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m2) groups. Thirteen texture features were extracted and then were analyzed to select the most valuable for discerning the three groups with each imaging method. A ROC curve was performed to compare the capacities of the features to differentiate non-sRI from sRI or CG. RESULTS: Six features proved to be the most valuable for assessing renal dysfunction: 0.25QuantileDWI, 0.5QuantileDWI, HomogeneityDWI, EntropyBOLD, SkewnessSWI, and CorrelationSWI. Three features derived from DWI (0.25QuantileDWI, 0.5QuantileDWI, and HomogeneityDWI) were smaller in sRI than in non-sRI; EntropyBOLD and CorrelationSWI were smaller in non-sRI than in CG (p < 0.05). 0.25QuantileDWI, 0.5QuantileDWI, and HomogeneityDWI showed similar capacities for differentiating sRI from non-sRI. Similarly, EntropyBOLD and CorrelationSWI showed equal capacities for differentiating non-sRI from CG. CONCLUSION: Texture analysis based on DWI, BOLD, and SWI can assist in assessing renal dysfunction, and texture features based on BOLD and SWI may be suitable for assessing renal dysfunction during early stages. KEY POINTS: • Texture analysis based on MRI techniques allowed for assessing renal dysfunction. • Texture features based on BOLD and SWI, but not DWI, may be suitable for assessing renal function impairment during early stages. • SWI exhibited a similar capacity to BOLD for assessing renal dysfunction.
Authors: Eric E Sigmund; Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Dabang Sui; Nicole A Lamparello; Kristopher Tantillo; Artem Mikheev; Henry Rusinek; James S Babb; Pippa Storey; Vivian S Lee; Hersh Chandarana Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Naznin Daginawala; Baojun Li; Karen Buch; HeiShun Yu; Brian Tischler; Muhammad Mustafa Qureshi; Jorge A Soto; Stephan Anderson Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Henrik J Michaely; Linda Metzger; Stefan Haneder; Jan Hansmann; Stefan O Schoenberg; Ulrike I Attenberger Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Rajiv Saran; Yi Li; Bruce Robinson; John Ayanian; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Jennifer Bragg-Gresham; Joline T L Chen; Elizabeth Cope; Debbie Gipson; Kevin He; William Herman; Michael Heung; Richard A Hirth; Steven S Jacobsen; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy; Alan B Leichtman; Yee Lu; Miklos Z Molnar; Hal Morgenstern; Brahmajee Nallamothu; Ann M O'Hare; Ronald Pisoni; Brett Plattner; Friedrich K Port; Panduranga Rao; Connie M Rhee; Douglas E Schaubel; David T Selewski; Vahakn Shahinian; John J Sim; Peter Song; Elani Streja; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Francesca Tentori; Paul W Eggers; Lawrence Y C Agodoa; Kevin C Abbott Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 8.860