Gumuyang Zhang1, Yan Liu2, Hao Sun1, Lili Xu1, Jianqing Sun3, Jing An4, Hailong Zhou1, Yanhan Liu1, Limeng Chen2, Zhengyu Jin1. 1. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Nephrology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 3. Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, China. 4. MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated its potential in the evaluation of renal function. Texture analysis (TA) is a novel technique to quantify tissue heterogeneity. We aim to investigate the feasibility of using TA based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as well as T1 and T2 maps to evaluate renal function. METHODS: Patients with impaired renal function and subjects with a normal renal function who underwent renal diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), as well as T1 and T2 mapping at 3T, were prospectively enrolled. The participants were classified into four groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2): normal (eGFR ≥90), mildly impaired (60≤ eGFR <90), moderately impaired (30≤ eGFR <60), and severely impaired (eGFR <30) renal function groups. Texture features quantified from the renal cortex or medulla were selected to build classifiers to discriminate different renal function groups by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: In total, 116 candidates were included (94 patients and 22 healthy volunteers, mean age 37.9±14.9 years). There were 46 participants in the normal renal function group, 14 in the mildly impaired renal function group, 27 in the moderately impaired renal function group, and 29 in the severely impaired renal function group. Texture features from the ADC and T1 maps exhibited a good correlation to eGFR. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV to differentiate between the normal and impaired renal function groups were 0.835, 0.792, 0.867, 0.905, and 0.722, respectively; to differentiate between the mildly impaired and moderately impaired groups were 0.937, 0.889, 0.857, 0.923, and 0.800, respectively; and to differentiate between the moderately impaired and severely impaired groups was 0.940, 0.759, 0.889, 0.880, and 0.774, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TA based on ADC and T1 maps is feasible for evaluating renal function with relatively good accuracy. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated its potential in the evaluation of renal function. Texture analysis (TA) is a novel technique to quantify tissue heterogeneity. We aim to investigate the feasibility of using TA based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as well as T1 and T2 maps to evaluate renal function. METHODS: Patients with impaired renal function and subjects with a normal renal function who underwent renal diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), as well as T1 and T2 mapping at 3T, were prospectively enrolled. The participants were classified into four groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2): normal (eGFR ≥90), mildly impaired (60≤ eGFR <90), moderately impaired (30≤ eGFR <60), and severely impaired (eGFR <30) renal function groups. Texture features quantified from the renal cortex or medulla were selected to build classifiers to discriminate different renal function groups by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: In total, 116 candidates were included (94 patients and 22 healthy volunteers, mean age 37.9±14.9 years). There were 46 participants in the normal renal function group, 14 in the mildly impaired renal function group, 27 in the moderately impaired renal function group, and 29 in the severely impaired renal function group. Texture features from the ADC and T1 maps exhibited a good correlation to eGFR. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV to differentiate between the normal and impaired renal function groups were 0.835, 0.792, 0.867, 0.905, and 0.722, respectively; to differentiate between the mildly impaired and moderately impaired groups were 0.937, 0.889, 0.857, 0.923, and 0.800, respectively; and to differentiate between the moderately impaired and severely impaired groups was 0.940, 0.759, 0.889, 0.880, and 0.774, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TA based on ADC and T1 maps is feasible for evaluating renal function with relatively good accuracy. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Timothy L Kline; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Marie E Edwards; Kyongtae T Bae; Alan Yu; Arlene B Chapman; Michal Mrug; Jared J Grantham; Douglas Landsittel; William M Bennett; Bernard F King; Peter C Harris; Vicente E Torres; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-05-20 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: I Friedli; L A Crowe; L Berchtold; S Moll; K Hadaya; T de Perrot; C Vesin; P-Y Martin; S de Seigneux; J-P Vallée Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lisa C Adams; Keno K Bressem; Sonja Scheibl; Max Nunninger; Andre Gentsch; Ute L Fahlenkamp; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Anna Caroli; Moritz Schneider; Iris Friedli; Alexandra Ljimani; Sophie De Seigneux; Peter Boor; Latha Gullapudi; Isma Kazmi; Iosif A Mendichovszky; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Nicholas M Selby; Harriet C Thoeny; Nicolas Grenier; Jean-Paul Vallée Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919