Literature DB >> 30559886

Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Low Energy Laser Application and Micro-Osteoperforations versus the Effect of Application of Each Technique Separately On the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement.

Ahmed Nasef Abdelhameed1, Wael Mohamed Mubarak Refai2.   

Abstract

AIM: The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of combined low energy laser application and Micro-Osteoperforations versus the effect of the application of each technique separately on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three parallel groups (each group contained 10 patients) were performed; Group A: In which one side was controlled side, and the other side received micro-osteoperforations (MOPs), Group B: In which one side was controlled side, and the other side received low-level laser therapy (LLLT), Group C: In which one side was controlled side, and the other side received both MOPs and LLLT.
RESULTS: Significant statistical differences were obvious in the rate of canine retraction between each intervention and the control sides as following; the MOPs increased the rate of canine retraction by 1.6 fold more than the control side, LLLT increased the rate of canine retraction by 1.3 fold than the control side, and combination of both techniques resulted in an increase in the rate of canine retraction by 1.8 fold more than the control side.
CONCLUSION: Combination of MOPs and LLLT proved to be more efficient regarding increasing the rate of canine retraction than the application of each technique separately.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LLLT; Micro-osteoperforations; OTM; Orthodontic mini-screws

Year:  2018        PMID: 30559886      PMCID: PMC6290399          DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci        ISSN: 1857-9655


  22 in total

1.  [The relationship between the length of orthodontic treatment and patient compliance].

Authors:  A Roykó; Z Dénes; G Razouk
Journal:  Fogorv Sz       Date:  1999-03

2.  Efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy in reducing treatment time and orthodontic pain: a clinical investigation.

Authors:  Gauri Doshi-Mehta; Wasundhara A Bhad-Patil
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fadi Al-Naoum; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Azzam Al-Jundi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 4.  Effectiveness of nickel-titanium springs vs elastomeric chains in orthodontic space closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Mohammed; M Z Rizk; K Wafaie; M Almuzian
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Feng-Yi Keng; Andrew N Quick; Michael V Swain; Peter Herbison
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Pretreatment characteristics associated with orthodontic treatment duration.

Authors:  Monica A Fisher; Reid M Wenger; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Delma R Cruz; Eduardo K Kohara; Martha S Ribeiro; Niklaus U Wetter
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Tisssue responses in corticotomy- and osteotomy-assisted tooth movements in rats: histology and immunostaining.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Won Lee; De-Lin Lei; Yan-Pu Liu; Dennis-Duke Yamashita; Stephen L-K Yen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.

Authors:  Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Pavithranand Ammayappan; Rajasigamani Kandaswamy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mohamed Youssef; Sharif Ashkar; Eyad Hamade; Norbert Gutknecht; Friedrich Lampert; Maziar Mir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.161

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Effect of the photobiomodulation for acceleration of the orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oralia Lucero Olmedo-Hernández; Alejandra Nathaly Mota-Rodríguez; Rafael Torres-Rosas; Liliana Argueta-Figueroa
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Doa'a Tahseen Alfailany; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Ahmad S Burhan; Luai Mahaini; Khaldoun Darwich; Ossama Aljabban
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial).

Authors:  Farah Y Eid; Walid A El-Kenany; Mohamed I Mowafy; Ahmed R El-Kalza
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  The Effectiveness of Conventional and Accelerated Methods of Orthodontic Traction and Alignment of Palatally Impacted Canines in Terms of Treatment Time, Velocity of Tooth Movement, Periodontal, and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahran Raheel Mousa; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Ahmad S Burhan; Omar Heshmeh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 5.  Influence of Human Papillomavirus on Alveolar Bone and Orthodontic Treatment: Systematic Review and Case Report.

Authors:  Oana Almășan; Ioana Duncea; Andreea Kui; Smaranda Buduru
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26

6.  Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances.

Authors:  Rashmi Mittal; Sonal Attri; Puneet Batra; Saurabh Sonar; Karan Sharma; Sreevatsan Raghavan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Perception of Iraqi Orthodontists and Patients toward Accelerated Orthodontics.

Authors:  Ali M Al-Attar; Samher Al-Shaham; Mushriq Abid
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-04-29

8.  Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction.

Authors:  Ibadullah Kundi; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Sohrab Shaheed
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-05-28

9.  Biological Anchorage and Canine Orthodontic Movement Rate with a New Technique for Micro-Osteoperforations.

Authors:  Andrés Arredondo; Daniela Pérez; Oscar Zapata-Noreña; Claudia Ramírez; Álvaro Carvajal-Flórez; Elsa Arango; Diana Barbosa-Liz; Jorge Gil; Paula Duque; Juan Gallego; Catalina Castaño; Sonia Patricia Plaza-Ruíz
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2022-02-03

Review 10.  The Effectiveness of Repetition or Multiplicity of Different Surgical and Non-Surgical Procedures Compared to a Single Procedure Application in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Doa'a Tahseen Alfailany; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Ossama Aljabban; Luai Mahaini
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.