Literature DB >> 35651986

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review.

Doa'a Tahseen Alfailany1, Mohammad Y Hajeer1, Ahmad S Burhan1, Luai Mahaini1, Khaldoun Darwich2, Ossama Aljabban3.   

Abstract

The objectives of this review were to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical acceleration methods and the side effects associated with these methods. Nine databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE®, Scopus®, PubMed®, Web of Science™, Google™ Scholar, Trip, OpenGrey, and PQDT OPEN from pro-Quest®. ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal (ICTRP) were screened to explore ongoing studies and unpublished literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of patients who received surgical interventions (invasive or minimally invasive techniques) in conjunction with traditional fixed appliances and who were compared to the non-surgical interventions, were included. The Cochrane tool for risk of bias (RoB.2) was used for evaluating RCTs, whereas the ROBINS-I tool was used for the CCTs. This systematic review included four RCTs and two CCTs (154 patients). The surgical and non-surgical interventions were found to have the same effect on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) accelerating in four trials. In contrast, the surgical interventions were superior in the other two studies. High heterogeneity among the included studies prevented conducting the quantitative synthesis of the findings. The reported side effects related to the surgical and non-surgical interventions were similar. A "very low" to "low" evidence indicates that the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement is similar, with no differences in the associated side effects. More high-quality clinical trials to compare the acceleration effectiveness between both modalities in different types of malocclusion is required.
Copyright © 2022, Alfailany et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerated tooth movement; corticotomy; full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap; lllt; mops; non-surgical; orthodontic; piezocision; prostaglandins; surgical

Year:  2022        PMID: 35651986      PMCID: PMC9138402          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  26 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in adolescent patients undergoing treatment by first bicuspid extraction and en mass retraction, associated with low-frequency mechanical vibrations in passive self-ligating and conventional brackets: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kumar; Puneet Batra; Karan Sharma; Sreevatsan Raghavan; Amit Srivastava
Journal:  Int Orthod       Date:  2020-11-06

Review 2.  The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Henry Ford Hosp Med J       Date:  1983

3.  The Effect of Using a Modified Dentoalveolar Distractor on Canine Angulation following Rapid Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Khaled I Al-Ainawi; Yaser Al-Mdalal; Mohammad Y Hajeer
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2016-01-01

4.  Evaluation of the acceleration, skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of low-level laser therapy combined with fixed posterior bite blocks in children with skeletal anterior open bite: A three-arm randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amjad Ali Hasan; Nada Rajeh; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Omar Hamadah; Mowaffak A Ajaj
Journal:  Int Orthod       Date:  2021-12-06

5.  Efficacy of piezocision-based flapless corticotomy in the orthodontic correction of severely crowded lower anterior teeth: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Omar Gibreal; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Bassel Brad
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Salma Al-Sibaie; Mohammad Y Hajeer
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  The Effectiveness of Repetition or Multiplicity of Different Surgical and Non-Surgical Procedures Compared to a Single Procedure Application in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Doa'a Tahseen Alfailany; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Ossama Aljabban; Luai Mahaini
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-12

8.  En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanin N Khlef; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Mowaffak A Ajaj; Omar Heshmeh
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2019-01-01

Review 9.  Acceleration of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment--a frontier in orthodontics.

Authors:  Ghada Nimeri; Chung H Kau; Nadia S Abou-Kheir; Rachel Corona
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 10.  Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alaa M H Alfawal; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Mowaffak A Ajaj; Omar Hamadah; Bassel Brad
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.