| Literature DB >> 35455802 |
Oana Almășan1, Ioana Duncea1, Andreea Kui1, Smaranda Buduru1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are detected in healthy oral mucosa as well as in oral lesions, dental practitioners have an important role in detecting any possible lesions that might be caused by this virus. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of orthodontic treatments and HPV infections and to report a rare case of ongoing orthodontic treatment superposed on an HPV infection.Entities:
Keywords: biomechanics; orthodontics; papillomavirus infection; tooth mobility
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455802 PMCID: PMC9028962 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10040624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Criterion | Inclusion | Exclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Time period | Publications available between January 2011 and December 2021 | All publications published before January 2011 |
| Language | English | Non-English |
| Type of articles | Publications reporting HPV infection with past or ongoing orthodontic treatment; case reports of subjects with HPV and orthodontic treatment. | Studies related to malignant lesions other than HPV and orthodontic treatments; |
English literature research of articles.
| English Literature Research of Articles Published between 2011–2021 | HPV and | HPV and Orthodontic Treatment | HPV and Tooth Movement | HPV and | HPV and |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PubMed | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Web of Science | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Embase | 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Scopus | 192 | 121 | 80 | 29 | 25 |
| Google Scholar | 799 | 235 | 563 | 309 | 97 |
Figure 1PRISMA flow diagram for research stages; literature search showed the following articles that reported a relationship between HPV and orthodontic treatment (Table 3).
Figure 2Lateral cephalogram.
Cephalometric tracing.
| Measurements | Result | Mean | S.D. | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNA | 80.03 | 81.08 | 3.7 | Normal A-P position of the maxilla |
| SNB | 75.40 | 79.17 | 3.8 | Normal A-P position of the mandible |
| ANB | 2.46 | 4.63 | 1.8 | skeletal class II |
| FMA | 26.32 | 29.63 | 3.0 | Hypodivergent facial pattern |
| Gonial angle | 123.44 | 124.31 | 5.4 | Normal gonial angle |
| APDI | 74.22 | 85.74 | 4.0 | Skeletal class II |
| A to N-Perp (FH) | −2.58 | 0.4 | 2.3 | Retruded maxilla |
| B to N-Perp (FH) | −12.06 | −3.5 | 2.0 | Retruded mandible |
| Pog to N-Perp (FH) | −9.14 | −1.8 | 2.5 | Retruded chin point |
| FH to AB | 76.26 | 81 | 3.0 | Skeletal class II |
| A-B to mandibular plane | 77.41 | 69.3 | 2.5 | Large angle |
| Wits appraisal | 5.61 | −2.74 | 0.3 | Skeletal class II |
| Overjet | 4.79 | 2 | 2.0 | Large overjet |
| Overbite | 2.46 | 2 | 2.0 | Normal overbite |
| U1 to FH | 100.88 | 113.8 | 6.4 | Retroclined upper incisor |
| U1 to SN | 93.59 | 105.28 | 6.6 | Retroclined upper incisor |
| U1 to UOP | 70.28 | 55 | 4.0 | Retroclined upper incisor |
| IMPA | 80.50 | 91.62 | 3.2 | Retroclined lower incisor |
| L1 to LOP | 74.77 | 66 | 5.0 | Retroclined lower incisor |
| Interincisal angle | 152.29 | 128 | 5.3 | Uprighted interincisal angle |
| Cant of occlusal plane | 5.66 | 9.3 | 3.8 | Normal occlusal plane angle |
| U1 to NA(mm) | 0.10 | 4 | 3.0 | Retruded upper incisor |
| U1 to NA(deg) | 13.55 | 22 | 5.0 | Retroclined upper incisor |
| L1 to NB(mm) | 1.5 | 4 | 2.0 | Retruded lower incisor |
| L1 to NB(deg) | 9.52 | 25 | 5.0 | Retroclined lower incisor |
| Upper incisal display | 3.17 | 2.5 | 1.5 | Normal incisal display |
| Upper lip to E-plane | −3.42 | 0 | 2.0 | Retruded upper lip |
| Lower lip to E-plane | −2.22 | 0 | 2.0 | Retruded lower lip |
| Nasolabial angle | 114.84 | 95 | 5.0 | Retruded lip |
| Extraction Index | 159.69 | 153.8 | 7.8 | Normal |
Figure 3Initial panoramic radiograph.
Figure 4Final panoramic radiograph.
Selected articles who met the inclusion criteria.
| Authors | Methods | Orthodontic Treatment | HPV Relationship | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schott S. et al., 2019 [ | Case-control | In the past | omen with orthodontic treatment in the past were more prone to prevention strategies for HPV in adulthood | “…concordance with the argumentation that cervical dysplasia occurs more frequently among |
| Santos-Silva A.R. et al., 2014 [ | Case reports (3 cases) | In the past | Tongue squamous cell carcinoma, HPV uncertain | “…full oral examinations, including |
| Case 1: 21-year-old woman | Final stage of orthodontic | SCC (squamous cell carcinoma)–biopsy | ||
| Case 2: 34-year-old man | Completed orthodontic treatment | SCC–biopsy | ||
| Case 3: 29-year-old woman | After an initial orthodontic evaluation, approximately | SCC–biopsy | ||
| Noonan V.L. et al., 2017 [ | Case report, 17 year-old male, Caucasian | Orthodontic retainer | Possible HPV etiology, although uncertain | “…the lesions presented exclusively in |
| Henn IW et al., 2014 [ | Case report, 37 year-old male | Yes, ongoing | HPV infection | “Oral condyloma acuminatum was noted in the patient in |
| Moine L., Gilligan G., 2018 [ | Case report, 13 year-old male | Yes, ongoing | Possible HPV etiology, although uncertain | Localized juvenile spongiotic gingival hyperplasia (LJSGH) was treated with trichloroacetic acid (TA) after a conventional surgical treatment. TA could be a safe alternative and a non-invasive technique to treat lesions associated to LJSGH. |
| Magalhaes M.A. et al., 2016 [ | Case report, 8-year-old male | Yes, ongoing | Squamous cell carcinoma, with positive staining | This rare case of squamous cell carcinoma was located in the gingiva and alveolar ridge, a common location for this demographic group; the post-operative evolution was without events, and the patient was considered disease free at 16 months after surgical resection. |