| Literature DB >> 30552408 |
Peter L Villa1,2, Robert Jackson2,3, Statton Eade1,2, Nicholas Escott4, Ingeborg Zehbe5,6.
Abstract
The successful isolation and propagation of patient-derived keratinocytes from cervical lesions constitute a more appropriate model of cervical disease than traditional cervical cancer-derived cell lines such as SiHa and CaSki. Our aim was to streamline the growth of patient-obtained, cervical keratinocytes into a reproducible process. We performed an observational case series study with 60 women referred to colposcopy for a diagnostic biopsy. Main outcome measures were how many samples could be passaged at least once (n = 11), and where enough cells could be established, to precisely define their proliferation profile over time (n = 3). Altering cell culture conditions over those reported by other groups markedly improved outcomes. We were also successful in making freeze backs which could be resuscitated to successfully propagate multi-layered, organoids from cervical keratinocytes (n = 3). For best results, biopsy-intrinsic factors such as size and tissue digestion appear to be major variables. This seems to be the first systematic report with a well characterized and defined sample size, detailed protocol, and carefully assessed cell yield and performance. This research is particularly impactful for constituting a sample repository-on-demand for appropriate disease modelling and drug screening under the umbrella of personalized health.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30552408 PMCID: PMC6294766 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36150-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Successful establishment of keratinocyte cultures from cervical biopsies of phase 1.
| Case ID | Category | Days to passage 1 | Days of life span | Size of biopsy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 0 | — | — | Medium |
| 73 | 1 | — | — | Medium |
| 95 | 0 | — | — | Medium |
| 57 | 1 | — | — | Medium |
| 28 | 3 | 38 | 60 | Medium |
| 03 | 0 | — | — | Small |
| 68 | 0 | — | — | Large |
| 96 | 3 | 31 | 53 | Large |
| 39 | 1 | 18 | 30 | Small |
| 48 | 1 | — | — | Small |
| 17 | 1 | — | — | Large |
| 22 | 2 | 28 | 32 | Medium |
| 97 | 1 | — | — | Medium |
| 27 | 0 | — | — | Small |
| 43 | 1 | — | — | Medium |
| 59 | 1 | — | — | Large |
| 62 | 0 | — | — | Large |
| 84 | 0 | — | — | Small |
| 04 | 0 | — | — | Medium |
| 15 | 0 | — | — | Medium |
Cases follow in chronological order reflecting when biopsies were taken. Note that of 30 specimens acquired, only 20 are included in this table as explained in Methods. Only 3/11 specimens that initially yielded colonies were proliferating. Here, culture life span is defined as until half of the population had acquired a “fried egg” phenotype (Methods). Samples were divided into 4 categories: 0 = No colonies of keratinocytes on starting in a T12.5 flask; 1 = Visible colonies of keratinocytes but either no or too little growth to move to next size flask (i.e. from T12.5 to T25); 2 = transfer to next size flask possible (T12.5 to T25); 3 = transfer to next size flask possible (T25 to T75). Flask scaling: We typically split the T12.5 flask to the next size T25 flask once it was ~50% confluent because the centre of the colonies was typically quite dense; the T25 flask was trypsinized at ~80% confluence and all recovered cells were seeded on the subsequent T75 flask.
Summary of biopsy parameters, patient information, and culture growth of phase 2.
| Case ID | Category | Days to passage 1 | Days of life span | Size of biopsy | Digestion | Lesion grade | HPV status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M33 | 0 | — | — | Medium | Poor | Metaplasia | 39 |
| UB1 | 0 | — | — | Small | Poor | CIN 1 | 45, 59 |
| 8N8 | 0 | — | — | Small | Poor | CIN 3 | 16 |
| QA7 | 0 | — | — | Small | Poor | Negative | 45 |
| A1U | 3 | 21 | 36 | Large | Good | CIN 1 | 6 |
| LY2 | 0 | — | — | Medium | Poor | CIN 1 | 53, 66 |
| HL7 | 0 | — | — | Medium | Poor | CIN 3 | 45 |
| IW9 | 3 | 19 | 24 | Small | Good | CIN 2–3 | 16 |
| 78I | 3 | 18 | 30 | Small | Poor | Negative | 52, 82, 89 |
| V7V | 0 | — | — | Small | Good | Negative | 16, 90 |
| 3UI | 4 | 13 | 50 | Medium | Good | CIN 2 | 31, 45, 89 |
| 04P | 2 | 20 | 28 | Medium | Good | CIN 1 | 51, 54, 81 |
| R4I | 0 | — | — | Small | Poor | Negative | 58 |
| AV6 | 4 | 9 | 26 | Medium | Good | CIN 3 | 16 |
| CS7 | 0 | — | — | Small | Good | CIN 1 | 33 |
| HW8 | 0 | — | — | Medium | Poor | CIN 1 | 45 |
| C5D | 1 | — | — | Large | Good | Negative | Negative |
| 7SG | 1 | — | — | Medium | Good | CIN 3 | 42, 52 |
| 83× | 1 | — | — | Medium | Poor | CIN 3 | 58, 90 |
| Z5X | 4 | 13 | 60 | Large | Good | CIN 2–3 | 16 |
| Y6A | 0 | — | — | Small | Good | CIN 2 | 18, 56, 81 |
| KR9 | 0 | — | — | Small | Good | CIN 1 | 6, 16, 70, 74 |
| C7Q | 3 | 13 | 24 | Medium | Good | Negative | Negative |
| VZ6 | 0 | — | — | Medium | Poor | CIN 1 | 16, 31 |
| WQ8 | 0 | — | — | Medium | Poor | CIN 2 | Negative |
| T8F | 0 | — | — | Small | Good | CIN 3 | 18 |
| YW4 | 0 | — | — | Large | Good | CIN 3 | 18 |
| Y8U | 1 | — | — | Small | Good | CIN 1 | 16, 45 |
| F7U | 1 | — | — | Small | Good | CIN 2 | 40, 62, 68 |
| DS7 | 1 | — | — | Small | Good | Negative | 18 |
Cases follow in chronological order reflecting when biopsies were taken. The first 22 biopsies were processed by an experimenter who was trained in culturing keratinocytes while the 8 following biopsies were processed by an trainee with no such prior experience (Methods). Biopsy size and visible digestion were noted on the day of sample processing. Patient’s age, HPV type(s), and lesion grade were recorded. Here, culture life span is defined as until half of the population had acquired a “fried egg” phenotype (Methods). Samples were divided into 5 categories: 0 = No colonies of keratinocytes on starting in a T12.5 flask; 1 = Visible colonies of keratinocytes but either no or too little growth to move to next size flask (i.e. from T12.5 to T25); 2 = Transfer to next size flask possible (T12.5 to T25); 3 = Transfer to next size flask possible (T25 to T75); 4 = As 3 but at least 3 consecutive passages split at a ratio of 1:10 into a T75 to accurately assess PDTs. Flask scaling: We typically split the T12.5 flask to the next size T25 flask once it was ~50% confluent because the centre of the colonies was typically quite dense; the T25 flask was trypsinized at ~80% confluence and all recovered cells were seeded on the subsequent T75 flask.
Figure 1Time course of a single colony of cervical keratinocytes from patient isolate #59 (phase 1). Phase-contrast and crystal violet-stained monolayers of keratinocyte colonies growing out from fragments of partially digested tissue and behaving as pseudo-explant cultures. Days 5, 11 and 22 are detailed (100X magnification).
Figure 2Life span phases of keratinocytes from patient isolate #22. Keratinocytes are visibly proliferating up to Day 21 (a). Keratinocytes have modestly but homogeneously increased in their apparent size by Day 26 (b). Keratinocytes are no longer proliferating, cell nuclei become centred, and cell membrane begins to spread along the flask evenly around the cell by Day 34 (c). Cells have uniformly increased in size by Day 40 (d). Magnification was 100X for a, b, c and d.
Figure 3Successful biopsy-derived isolates 3UI, AV6 and Z5X (phase 2) grown as organoids. From left to right: Phase-contrast (PC) micrographs of keratinocyte monolayers (100X magnification), hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained micrographs of sectioned formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded raft cultures (200X magnification), and immunofluorescence micrographs of cytokeratin (CK) 14, 17, 19, and p16INK4A of sectioned formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded raft cultures (200X magnification). Green fluorescence represents cytokeratins; red fluorescence represents p16INK4A; blue DAPI staining indicates nuclei; white dashed line represents basal cell membrane intersecting epidermis and dermis (from top to bottom).