Literature DB >> 30546971

Intuitive Clinician Control Interface for a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study.

David Quintero1,2, Emma Reznick1, Daniel J Lambert3, Siavash Rezazadeh1, Leslie Gray4, Robert D Gregg1,2.   

Abstract

This paper presents a potential solution to the challenge of configuring powered knee-ankle prostheses in a clinical setting. Typically, powered prostheses use impedance-based control schemes that contain several independent controllers which correspond to consecutive periods along the gait cycle. This control strategy has numerous control parameters and switching rules that are generally tuned by researchers or technicians and not by a certified prosthetist. We propose an intuitive clinician control interface (CCI) in which clinicians tune a powered knee-ankle prosthesis based on a virtual constraint control scheme, which tracks desired periodic joint trajectories based on a continuous measurement of the phase (or progression) of gait. The interface derives virtual constraints from clinician-designed joint kinematic trajectories. An experiment was conducted in which a certified prosthetist used the control interface to configure a powered knee-ankle prosthesis for a transfemoral amputee subject during level-ground walking trials. While it usually takes engineers hours of tuning individual parameters by trial and error, the CCI allowed the clinician to tune the powered prosthesis controller in under 10 min. This allowed the clinician to improve several amputee gait outcome metrics, such as gait symmetry. These results suggest that the CCI can improve the clinical viability of emerging powered knee-ankle prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prosthetics; legged locomotion; robot control; user interfaces

Year:  2018        PMID: 30546971      PMCID: PMC6286184          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2880199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  24 in total

1.  A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices.

Authors:  Jennifer L Johansson; Delsey M Sherrill; Patrick O Riley; Paolo Bonato; Hugh Herr
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Temporal-spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees: Comparison of bionic and mechanically passive knee joints.

Authors:  Jaroslav Uchytil; Daniel Jandacka; David Zahradnik; Roman Farana; Miroslav Janura
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Toward Unified Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  David Quintero; Anne E Martin; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 5.485

4.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Authors:  Frank Sup; Amit Bohara; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Int J Rob Res       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.703

5.  Frontal plane pelvis and hip kinematics of transfemoral amputee gait. Effect of a prosthetic foot with active ankle dorsiflexion and individualized training - a case study.

Authors:  Anna Armannsdottir; Roy Tranberg; Gudfinna Halldorsdottir; Kristin Briem
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2017-10-03

6.  [Prosthetics and Orthotics: Prosthetic Fitting in Lower Extremity in Transfemoral Amputation].

Authors:  Bernhard Greitemann
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 0.923

7.  Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization.

Authors:  Kara K Patterson; William H Gage; Dina Brooks; Sandra E Black; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  A Robust Parameterization of Human Gait Patterns Across Phase-Shifting Perturbations.

Authors:  Dario J Villarreal; Hasan A Poonawala; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Continuous-Phase Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: Amputee Experiments Across Speeds and Inclines.

Authors:  David Quintero; Dario J Villarreal; Daniel J Lambert; Susan Kapp; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.567

10.  Configuring a powered knee and ankle prosthesis for transfemoral amputees within five specific ambulation modes.

Authors:  Ann M Simon; Kimberly A Ingraham; Nicholas P Fey; Suzanne B Finucane; Robert D Lipschutz; Aaron J Young; Levi J Hargrove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of Continuously Varying Kinematics for Prosthetic Leg Control Applications.

Authors:  Kyle R Embry; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Modeling the Transitional Kinematics Between Variable-Incline Walking and Stair Climbing.

Authors:  Shihao Cheng; Edgar Bolívar-Nieto; Cara Gonzalez Welker; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Wearer-Prosthesis Interaction for Symmetrical Gait: A Study Enabled by Reinforcement Learning Prosthesis Control.

Authors:  Yue Wen; Minhan Li; Jennie Si; He Huang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Effects of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis on Amputee Hip Compensations: A Case Series.

Authors:  Toby Elery; Siavash Rezazadeh; Emma Reznick; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  A Phase Variable Approach for Improved Rhythmic and Non-Rhythmic Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.

Authors:  Siavash Rezazadeh; David Quintero; Nikhil Divekar; Emma Reznick; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.367

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.