Literature DB >> 23824546

Temporal-spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees: Comparison of bionic and mechanically passive knee joints.

Jaroslav Uchytil1, Daniel Jandacka2, David Zahradnik2, Roman Farana2, Miroslav Janura3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A symmetrical gait affords the most efficient walking pattern. Bionic prostheses should provide better gait symmetry than mechanically passive prostheses with respect to a nonpathological gait.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the basic temporal-spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees fitted with bionic or mechanically passive prosthetic knees with those of subjects with a nonpathological gait. STUDY
DESIGN: Three-dimensional gait analysis using an optoelectronic device.
METHODS: Eight transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Subjects walked across two dynamometric platforms a total of 15 times. Movement kinematics were measured using optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry.
RESULTS: The swing time of the affected limb in patients fitted with a mechanically passive knee joint was longer than that of the nonaffected limb by 0.055 s (effect size = 1.57). Compared with the control group, the swing time of the prosthetic limb in patients fitted with a mechanically passive knee was longer by 0.042 s (effect size = 2.1). Similarly, the stance time of the nonaffected limb was longer by 0.047 s (effect size = 1.07).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a mechanically passive knee joint, a bionic knee joint evinced gait symmetry. Both the stance time and the swing time for amputees with a bionic knee were similar to those of nonamputees. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prosthetists aim to design prostheses that achieve a good symmetry between the healthy and affected limbs. The use of bionic technology achieves a level of symmetry approaching that observed in nonamputees. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputation; bionic knee joint; gait; kinematic analysis; prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824546     DOI: 10.1177/0309364613492789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  3 in total

1.  Intuitive Clinician Control Interface for a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study.

Authors:  David Quintero; Emma Reznick; Daniel J Lambert; Siavash Rezazadeh; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Kinetic Gait Parameters in Unilateral Lower Limb Amputations and Normal Gait in Able-Bodied: Reference Values for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Karin Schmid-Zalaudek; Theresa Fischer; Zoltán Száva; Helmut Karl Lackner; Ursula Kropiunig; Christian Bittner; Karl Höcker; Günther Winkler; Gerfried Peternell
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Characterizing the Gait of People With Different Types of Amputation and Prosthetic Components Through Multimodal Measurements: A Methodological Perspective.

Authors:  Cristiano De Marchis; Simone Ranaldi; Tiwana Varrecchia; Mariano Serrao; Stefano Filippo Castiglia; Antonella Tatarelli; Alberto Ranavolo; Francesco Draicchio; Francesco Lacquaniti; Silvia Conforto
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-03-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.